The Chelsea Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ramires
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 35K
  • Views Views 3M
Chelsea doesn't exist without Hazard, Swansea game made it clear and this just confirms it.
 
Subtle said:
Two players that could win us that game: 1 injured, 1 sold.

I said I would reserve judgement on the selling of Mata and on Jose's return until the end of this transfer window but honestly I'm massively underwhelmed atm. If we lose the CL semi, and lose the title to Liverpool, I think it will be fair to say that this season has been a failure for all involved.

That said, I still believe. I can see Liverpool dropping points before the end of the season, and us snatching it at the death. It all comes to down to the game in 8 days. UTB!
Click to expand...

WOAHWOAHWOAH, what the **** am I reading!?

 
With Mourinho's post-match comments he's looking at another touchline ban. Looks like he opted to do tactical exit for Liverpool game. Hilarious.
 
JDY said:
Deserves any ban he gets (can he get one?), but Larsson shouldn't have been on the pitch after his foul moments earlier
Click to expand...

As far as I know he can still get a 3 game ban. And agree about Larsson.
 
Subtle said:
Two players that could win us that game: 1 injured, 1 sold.

I said I would reserve judgement on the selling of Mata and on Jose's return until the end of this transfer window but honestly I'm massively underwhelmed atm. If we lose the CL semi, and lose the title to Liverpool, I think it will be fair to say that this season has been a failure for all involved.

That said, I still believe. I can see Liverpool dropping points before the end of the season, and us snatching it at the death. It all comes to down to the game in 8 days. UTB!
Click to expand...

Massively hypothetical though don't you think? Did we struggle to create chances, 31 attempts would presume not. Maybe Hazard's willingness to take on players could have opened up more spaces but maybe it wouldn't have, it hasn't worked in every game this season. And i accept that's your opinion that its "been a failure for all involved this season" but i think your wrong. This time last season we were in an Europa League semi final and 17 points behind the leaders Man Utd. Personally i won't grumble.

Vanjagl said:
Yea, who remembers that goal against Barcelona anyway
Click to expand...

Cannot keep/rate a player on a few good moments. This season has been absolutely woeful and for so long now i have said he cannot play in a 4-2-3-1 and Jose is finding that out.

Mike. said:
As for Ramires, he IS that type of guy.
Click to expand...

100% is that type, has that in his locker but today was the first time it was malicious. most of his poor tackles come because his first touch is so poor and so over hit his second one is normally a 50/50!

JDY said:
Deserves any ban he gets (can he get one?), but Larsson shouldn't have been on the pitch after his foul moments earlier
Click to expand...

Yeah he can as the ref did not see it in the game, he should and will get 3 games and we will be better off without him right now in the form he is in.
 
CJACKO11 said:
Massively hypothetical though don't you think? Did we struggle to create chances, 31 attempts would presume not. Maybe Hazard's willingness to take on players could have opened up more spaces but maybe it wouldn't have, it hasn't worked in every game this season. And i accept that's your opinion that its "been a failure for all involved this season" but i think your wrong. This time last season we were in an Europa League semi final and 17 points behind the leaders Man Utd. Personally i won't grumble.
Click to expand...

Being honest not many were clear cut... alot of those efforts were desperation and long range efforts as you couldnt break through a stubborn Sunderland defence

Without Hazard it does seem Chelsea lack someone to 'unlock door's'.... which is remarkable considering the three behind Eto'o today were brought for around 70 million
 
Vanjagl said:
Yea, who remembers that goal against Barcelona anyway
Click to expand...

If you want to bring up important goals what about Torres scoring in EUROPA league final? Yet he is still ****. Don't get me wrong Ramires was quality during our champions league winning season but since he has just gone down hill and our results with and without him prove what a liability he has been.
 
That's not the point guys. That was said in such manner some would think he killed someone, pilled him and wore his skin as trophy.
 
LFCMarshall said:
Being honest not many were clear cut... alot of those efforts were desperation and long range efforts as you couldnt break through a stubborn Sunderland defence

Without Hazard it does seem Chelsea lack someone to 'unlock door's'.... which is remarkable considering the three behind Eto'o today were brought for around 70 million
Click to expand...

And without a proper strikers runs we wouldn't have done it with a Mata player. Eto'o spent most of time out wide left trying to cut inside. I am 100% convinced with a striker who can get into "striker" areas we will be able to break down teams like this.

Vanjagl said:
That's not the point guys. That was said in such manner some would think he killed someone, pilled him and wore his skin as trophy.
Click to expand...

The thing is its not just about today, he has been absolutely abysmal this season like really poor.

TJD07 said:
The **** was with the pitch btw? Players falling over all game.
Click to expand...

Far too over watered.
 
No matter how bad he was this season, that's not how you should treat the player who got you into CL final. I don't care. I don't want ot care; I:m off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top