The Liverpool Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve*
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 44K
  • Views Views 3M
Would not go that far tbh, would say that on a level at best.

sakho not only ***** on smalling he ****** on him too... man smalling is awful, hasnt improved one bit in all these years youd think he would learn from rio and vidic. the only thing smalling is good at is attacking the ball from corners
 
sakho not only ***** on smalling he ****** on him too... man smalling is awful, hasnt improved one bit in all these years youd think he would learn from rio and vidic. the only thing smalling is good at is attacking the ball from corners
Funny that coz I have Spoke to many Pool fans at work and they rate Smalling and say Sakho is only slightly better.
 
It's hard to make a comparison

you can make a comparison, klopp consistently has his best players stolen by direct rivels and he will most likely lose reus in the summer and has been hindered by severe injuries to most of his first team. rodgers has spent more than 150mill and in his own words anyone who spends that much should be winning the league. in the three years his been here the defence has not improved at all and his spent more than 50 mill on the defence alone. dont tell me you havent forgotten about the first half of the season hes constant persistence with 4 3 3 possesion that has never worked instead of the high pressure football that got us to 2nd. rodgers imo is a fraud and if we dont get 4th (highly unlikely) **** probably be gone in the summer
 
Funny that coz I have Spoke to many Pool fans at work and they rate Smalling and say Sakho is only slightly better.

every one has the own opinion but honestly watch a game with smalling and his positional sense must make you pull you hair out, he is everything wrong with english football in my opinion, producing an athlete rather than a footballer.
 
every one has the own opinion but honestly watch a game with smalling and his positional sense must make you pull you hair out, he is everything wrong with english football in my opinion, producing an athlete rather than a footballer.
I agree tbh he can be shocking at times! But can go on 4-5 game run when hes excellent so frustrating as a fan lol.
 
I agree tbh he can be shocking at times! But can go on 4-5 game run when hes excellent so frustrating as a fan lol.

i get what you mean, for us its skrtel, who has fooled countless managers and fans into thinking his our best defender. cant pass a ball under pressure to save his life, and he constantly drops deep meaning the whole defence has to drop deep with him, can be extremely frustrating. he offers no communication to his centre back partner and isnt a leader at the back but hey he pops up with important goals so what can you do.
 
would love lacazette he would be perfect. i wouldnt mind signing danny ings on a free transfer either hes contract is up in the summer goen into next year with sturridge, origi, lacazette and ings would not be bad at all
Can see loads clubs after both. Both are good imo. Lots of good freebies available end of season!
 
they signed salah just so we couldnt get him last january

I highly doubt a top professional football club and business would sign a player just for that reason.

There was obviously an interest as well - but it wouldn't surprise if their pursuit intensified purely because of interest from a rival

The funny thing was that Salah bought into it and now his career has been put back as a bit part player who needs to rebuild himself again
 
Seems as though Cuadrado is heading to Chelsea with Salah and Schurrle available - I certainly would take Schurrle for the right price!

I probably think it will be Salah on the move if Cuadrado comes. Schurrle is one of Mourinho's favourites
 
Can see loads clubs after both. Both are good imo. Lots of good freebies available end of season!

milner, ings, khedira, dani alves, konoplyanka, winston reid, schar, delph not bad players at all could be a few good deals done by a few teams with those players
 
Salah made his choice so **** him.

I highly doubt a top professional football club and business would sign a player just for that reason.

I highly doubt a manager would so openly criticise how ***** his clubs supporters are but he has done, and on numerous occasions.
 
its chelsea and mourinho of course they would

Erm no ... Salah was bought to replace Mata after we sold him to United in January. No club spends millions of dollars just to keep players off someone else's hands especially in the FFP era. Going by that logic, Chelsea should have bought Lambert, Can, Moreno, Lallana and Balotelli. Because hey ho, stealing average players from Liverpool is our new business model after all
 
Last edited:
Salah made his choice so **** him.



I highly doubt a manager would so openly criticise how ***** his clubs supporters are but he has done, and on numerous occasions.

Non-analogous situation. I also didn't know that criticizing the support twice suddenly amounted to criticizing the support on 'numerous' occasions
 
There was obviously an interest as well - but it wouldn't surprise if their pursuit intensified purely because of interest from a rival

The funny thing was that Salah bought into it and now his career has been put back as a bit part player who needs to rebuild himself again

Our interest intensified purely because we sold Mata. I feel for Salah but he still needs to develop more before he can play regularly for a top club like Chelsea. He is extremely quick but is a bit underwhelming in other areas
 
Erm no ... Salah was bought to replace Mata after we sold him to United in January. No club spends millions of dollars just to keep players off someone else's hands especially in the FFP era. Going by that logic, Chelsea should have bought Lambert, Can, Moreno, Lallana and Balotelli. Because hey ho, stealing average players from Liverpool is our new business model after all

I think that one touched a nerve haha
 
Erm no ... Salah was bought to replace Mata after we sold him to United in January. No club spends millions of dollars just to keep players off someone else's hands especially in the FFP era. Going by that logic, Chelsea should have bought Lambert, Can, Moreno, Lallana and Balotelli. Because hey ho, stealing average players from Liverpool is our new business model after all

i doubt chelsea were even interested in him till liverpool where, mourinho complaining about FFP he didnt seem to mind when he first took over and bought every man and his dog
 
Back
Top