The Manchester City Thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 79730
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 3K
  • Views Views 245K
Which begs the question, on a terminal day for FFP, just what is the point of UEFA?
UEFA were embarrassed the moment they went after City for these infractions. How you imposing a ban on illegally obtained documents, doesnt matter whats in those documents. It wouldn't hold up in kangaroo court let alone CAS.
 
UEFA were embarrassed the moment they went after City for these infractions. How you imposing a ban on illegally obtained documents, doesnt matter whats in those documents. It wouldn't hold up in kangaroo court let alone CAS.

So again, just WHAT is the point of them?
 
The time bared thing is a farce. Oh yes we know you did wrong but because it was 5 or more years ago don’t worry about it. Wonder if this works in any other criminal law ??‍♂️
 
The time bared thing is a farce. Oh yes we know you did wrong but because it was 5 or more years ago don’t worry about it. Wonder if this works in any other criminal law ??‍♂️

Yes, all of them. statute of limitations is very common. The time-barred period predates the settlement City already paid and dealt with in 2014.
 

Profile photo, opens profile page on Twitter in a new tab

Simon Stone

@sistoney67

La Liga president Javier Tebas has not taken @ManCity verdict well: “We have to reassess whether the CAS is the appropriate body to which to appeal institutional decisions in football. Switzerland is a country with a great history of arbitration, the CAS is not up to standard.”
 
Back
Top