Fallacy. No needs for words like this so late in the day![]()
Not my fault that I have such a brilliant grasp of the English language mate ...
Fallacy. No needs for words like this so late in the day![]()
You need at least 2 players to match Chelsea/City squad for squad. A top class CB and CM. In fact, I think you would probably have a better squad if you got two such players in. Ronaldo is excellent no doubt but if it's a case of either Ronaldo or (Top class CM and CB), I know which one I would pick
Although, knowing Woodward, he will just try get all 3. Watch this space
No need to be like thatNot my fault that I have such a brilliant grasp of the English language mate ...
We dont need another CM with Ronaldo, since Di Maria would stay CM. And it wouldnt come down to a choice between ronaldo and CB and CM. Only position is CB IF the the others done push on in the next year. Club don't need more players, they need to become more of a team first. Ronaldo would slot in like he never left.
No need to be like that![]()
Yes. Poor management more than anything! Surely Wenger must see this!?More on OZIL who the British tabloids seem to really have it in for (and who imho is class):
'Mesut Ozil is following in the same footsteps as Juan Sebastian Veron...maybe he isn't cut out to play for an English team,' writes Matt Barlow in the Daily Mail.
Or, maybe it would be an idea to play him in his natural position as a No. 10?
More on OZIL who the British tabloids seem to really have it in for (and who imho is class):
'Mesut Ozil is following in the same footsteps as Juan Sebastian Veron...maybe he isn't cut out to play for an English team,' writes Matt Barlow in the Daily Mail.
Or, maybe it would be an idea to play him in his natural position as a No. 10?
Yes. Poor management more than anything! Surely Wenger must see this!?
More on OZIL who the British tabloids seem to really have it in for (and who imho is class):
'Mesut Ozil is following in the same footsteps as Juan Sebastian Veron...maybe he isn't cut out to play for an English team,' writes Matt Barlow in the Daily Mail.
Or, maybe it would be an idea to play him in his natural position as a No. 10?
Criticism of Ozil is reaching ridiculous levels, actually. Criticism of Wenger? I agree, he's not at all been upto scratch. I dunno, though, Ozil isn't completely out of position, I think he played in the wings during the WC, but the thing is, he was rested for it, he had a better bunch of players around him and he had a different role. If Wenger is so determined to stick around to placing Ozil on the wings, atleast do it in a way that suits him :\
I think he played in the wings during the WC
Only because Reus got injured though. And he was probably their worst peformer too.
Ozil is just not a wide player - its not that he can't deliver offensively from the wing, its that he has no pace to speak off and stamina of someone twice he's age. Put him on the wing and opposing fullbacks and wingers eat him alive.
I'm sorry but Strootman is one of the finest all-round CM's in the world, I'm sure he'd fit in any team pretty much and I'd still deem him a priority, sure for games against smaller teams Herrera, Di Maria and Blind works well. But for bigger games, it's yet to be seen. (Lets not get carried away though, it's only been 1 game, need to see this in like 5 games to establish whether it is working as good as we're making out or not).
Not to mention our depth is still paper thin, especially if one gets injured, we're relying on Fletcher again, who I'm sorry, is a nice bloke n all, but isn't United standard any more.
Yet the trio you mention are big game players. Especially Herrera and certainly Di Maria.
Blind, Herrera, Di Maria is a very strong midfield by all accounts. If you want to add more to that, you add around it (defence and attack)