And here is where we will differ, I watched the City game, and for 45-something minutes couldn't believe how badly wrong he had got it. We looked plain awful, huge gaps for City to exploit and but for the fact Sterling couldn't hit a thing we would have been 4 or 5 down by half time.
Superb comeback, granted, but from two nil down against the best team in the country not a 'success' as we had to fight back from said two-nil down.
Results are good against the top six BUT, how many of them come when he has to switch from Plan A to plan B? The top managers get Plan A right the first time.
Only time I really felt Mou got it right first time was against Liverpool, with the long balls over their high press but even them, 2nd half we looked 2nd best because he changed things.
Yes, it was a fantastic fight back against City, one of United's finest, but I am hesitant to give Mou all the credit, as I feel, and am hearing, the players were the ones who fired themselves up - Young, Pogba, Herrera in particular.
It was Sir MAtt who once said "Winning isn't everything, winning in style is what matters" and I just don't see Mourinho as 'United'.
Not sure how you could hear all that, and ignore the fact he was the one who started it,saying, do we want to be remembers as jokers. They all got fired up for each other, manager and senior players.
And this plan A stuff is ridiculous. Ferguson was incredibly adaptable. Plenty are.
I'd rather people simply say they don't like Mourinho than invent absolutely bizarre reasons to justify their dislike (criticising a manger for turning a game around, really?)
Last edited: