The Premier League Thread

[Scouseinthehouse]

Premier League top 10, calendar year 2022


1. Man City – 79 points, 2.32 PPG
2. Liverpool – 79 points, 2.26 PPG
3. Arsenal – 77 points, 2.2 PPG
4. Newcastle – 72 points, 2 PPG
5. Tottenham – 71 points, 1.92 PPG
6. Man Utd – 59 points, 1.64 PPG
7. Chelsea - 56 points, 1.7 PPG
8. Brighton – 51 points, 1.42 PPG
9. Brentford - 49 points, 1.32 PPG
10. Crystal Palace – 47 points, 1.34 PPG

All the best to your teams in 2023. Unless you happen to follow the Ev. In which case I sincerely hope 2023 brings Championship football for you.

FWIW, I still expect the top 3 from the above to finish in that order. With 4- 7 being a crapshoot between those 4 sides.

Let the 2023 games begin!

 

[Theatre of Dreams83]

Spurs and Chelsea

 

[Vanjagl]

Good, good.

 

[Theatre of Dreams83]

Sad news for West Ham as a club today

 

[Theatre of Dreams83]

If Chelsea get Fernandez, Mudryk and Badeshille they will have spent over 500m£ in their first season under new owner. Maybe to finish 5 th or lower

 

[Scouseinthehouse]

They're a complete shitshow that Potter will pay the price for.

But I'm more interested to see where this leaves Rice.

 

[Theatre of Dreams83]

They're a complete shitshow that Potter will pay the price for.

But I'm more interested to see where this leaves Rice.

Key summer target apparently

 

[Anthony]

 

[Vanjagl]

What a night for football rules.
If the Lpool-Wolves finish 2-2, then I have to watch the rematch. Crazy 2nd half.

 

[Theatre of Dreams83]

What a night for football rules.
If the Lpool-Wolves finish 2-2, then I have to watch the rematch. Crazy 2nd half.

Another farce for VAR!

 

[Vanjagl]

Another farce for VAR!

What do you have in mind? Haven't watched the first half.

 

[Theatre of Dreams83]

What do you have in mind? Haven't watched the first half.

Wolves 3rd goal disallowed. Like wtf

 

[Vanjagl]

The thing is, I can't be mad about it because then never showed the full image. It might have been, it might have not. If they don't have the footage and considering how determined the linesman was, I'm inclined to believe it was an offside.
However, there's no way of knowing it without the footage.

 

[Theatre of Dreams83]

The thing is, I can't be mad about it because then never showed the full image. It might have been, it might have not. If they don't have the footage and considering the show determined linesman was, I'm inclined to believe it was an offside.
However, there's no way of knowing it without the footage.

Exactly it’s a farce how can you have VAR but not have the camera angle to check if it was offside or not. Did they spend so much money on Nunez they couldn’t afford to get VAR fully installed correctly or something

 

[Scouseinthehouse]

Exactly it’s a farce how can you have VAR but not have the camera angle to check if it was offside or not. Did they spend so much money on Nunez they couldn’t afford to get VAR fully installed correctly or something

Happened at a few PL games this season. Not least to ourselves at Arsenal in a game we never should have lost.

The clubs aren’t responsible for the VAR set-up.

 

[Anthony]

Another farce for VAR!

Sure you can't have the likes of Wolves in a final?
That won't sell advertising space

 

[Theatre of Dreams83]

Match day

 

[Bujakaa92]

For now.No idea what Chealse is trying..

 

[Theatre of Dreams83]

View attachment 613709
For now.No idea what Chealse is trying..

There trying the American owners model of wasting money and having no idea how to run a football club

 

[Theatre of Dreams83]

John Cross

@johncrossmirror
·
Exclusive: Police to visit 1,000 homes this week in crackdown on illegal streaming. “Operation Raider” has got a huge database of names of people who have bought modified boxes or “fire sticks” to watch Prem games, other sports and movies illegally.