Torres, Villa, Cardozo or Dzeko (PLEASE HELP!)

  • Thread starter Thread starter NpManC
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 26
  • Views Views 4K
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

NpManC

Member
Joined
May 3, 2010
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I think the title says it all. Someone who has experience with more than one of the players please tell me who is better than who, or if you have played with them all, who is best overall.

This is driving me crazy! Money is no problem, who would be the best if they all cost the same amount of money?

I play 2 MC's, christiano ronaldo AML and messi AMR, then 2 strikers, one of whom is Aguero.

Thanks in advance,

Neal :)
 
Last edited:
Dzeko is allways good for me, and Villa gets results if that's what you are looking at. Torres can be fantastic, but goes on goal less streaks.
 
Agree with post above

Torres isn't as consistent as Villa
 
Torres can be consistent if played right.. the only problem is how to play him. Also depends how your playing... in my opinion if your playing 1 upfront id go with dzeko or torres but overall i would go with Torres if you have decent enough backup to cover him when injured.
 
Last edited:
1. David Villa
2. Edin Dzeko
3. Fernando Torres
4. Oscar Cardozo
 
Villa as a right sided poacher, 40 goals a season easy
 
there isnt really a who better than who, all are lethal is used properly
 
Torres>Villa>Dzeko>Cardozo
 
I have...

Torres - ST - Complete Forward - Attack.
Villa - ST - Advanced Forward - Attack.
Pato/Aguero - AMR - Inside Forward- Attack

So far I have 60+goals in around 15 games.
 
villa and torres are similar, so are dzeko and cardozo. villa beats torres, dzeko beats cardozo.
 
Cardozo's the cheapest option though, and he's probably just as good as the others. Plus he's a left footed beast at free kicks and also gets in loads of long shots
 
I think that Cardozo or Dzeko come anywere near the likes of Torres Or Villa...its without a doubt between them two! Torres can be fantastic with a great player to feed him through, where as Villa can do it more or less solo...as a liverpool fan i say Torres but i still wpuld have Villa in my team without a doubt!
 
I would go for Dzeko because he is younger, cheaper and in my opinion better than the other players, villa is good but aging and over priced
 
MUFC4EV@ said:
I would go for Dzeko because he is younger, cheaper and in my opinion better than the other players, villa is good but aging and over priced
Click to expand...

if you get dzeko for less than 24m i'll be impressed. villa is the arguably the best striker in the game when used properly.

you should buy dzeko, because you already have aguero. he's a pacy striker who can bag a lot of goals but isn't too good in the air, which is where dzeko comes in as a beast target man ;)
 
Gaffer said:
if you get dzeko for less than 24m i'll be impressed. villa is the arguably the best striker in the game when used properly.

you should buy dzeko, because you already have aguero. he's a pacy striker who can bag a lot of goals but isn't too good in the air, which is where dzeko comes in as a beast target man ;)
Click to expand...
i got dzeko for 24mil so close to getting your approval, so far he has been great :D
 
you got him for 25m ;) and anyway you now what i mean :$
 
Anyone that signs these players just ruins the game imo, whats the point in playing as a club with 200mill, using a downloaded tactic and buying the 6 or so best players in the game? Your just doing what everyone else is doing =) May aswel watch Man city IRL. Anyway to answer the post id say Villa, nvm his age ur just going to spend another 50mill on a player that someone raves on about next season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top