look on there gk raiting

0640d-8886d50e-c513-428b-a701-9730fc99153b.png
 
Just i advice? should i sell bazoer for 40 million pounds? can buy him back for the same. but i dont no what would you guys have done?:)
 
Just i advice? should i sell bazoer for 40 million pounds? can buy him back for the same. but i dont no what would you guys have done?:)

who are u going to buy to replace him? btw i like this player cuz he can play in a diffrent positions
 
if i don't have left footed players to play in AMR position, what i can change to play with right and left footed in AMR and AML position and maintance the performance of this brilliant tactic ?
 
who are u going to buy to replace him? btw i like this player cuz he can play in a diffrent positions
Like him too but 40 mil pounds only gave 15 mil for him. i not have i direct replacing for him maybe i regen :) but maybe i keep him im not sure rigth now.
 
Hi all,

Would it be possible to have screenshots of general team & players setup in order to help me to reproduce this tactic in FMT Tablet?

Thanks in advance.
 
TFF, u know that I am great fan of your tactics...

I have try wrath, and ultimate, played same matches with total fluid tactic Ultimate Vs Conqueror V5, always far away better results were with Conqueror. Same I did with Wrath Vs Conqueror.

I do not say that Ultimate is bad tactic, it has some advantages against conqueror, IF are more dangerous tham MR ML in conqueror, the have more space and better shot angle.

But defence in Conqueror, with MR ML that helps in defense to FB, and FC that has manual marking and makes 451 in defense is more superior than anything this year.

As some people know
I have won Champions League and World club cup with Partizan Belgrade (in 5 seasons)
Have won Champions League and World club cup with St Gallen (in 4 seasons)

All it pretty easy, with conqueror.

Now I have experiment with Pyunik (Armeni) 1 of 4 worst league in Europe. And conquereor still works incredible, i have try lot of times with Ultimate, but it is not even close in OVERARCHING.

Just to ilustrate that in one exampe:

CL qualification 3x stronger opponent, I have played first match with ultimete, easy lost 0:2 home against Basel
so I used conqueror in away match and guess what:

View attachment 159906

No this was not a luck, a have played 3x times with conqueror, and have 2 wins, 1 draw.
Than I have had played same match 3x times with ultimate and again 3 easy lost games.

Just to say, I have **** player, CA 90-100, no one wants to come to Armenia, even from Costa Rica, Guatemala leagues...

And important thing, my team suits better for Ultimate, than for Qonqueror, but in both fluid tactics this was hapened..and it was not first time that i have tried both tactic for same match.


My concluson, I know that manual marking is borring for people, but that is the thing that makes your team overarchiving.
So TFF I thing that u can make more superior tactic based just on Qonqueror.\

Cheers mate!
 
Last edited:
TFF, u know that I am great fan of your tactics...

I have try wrath, and ultimate, played same matches with total fluid tactic Ultimate Vs Conqueror V5, always far away better results were with Conqueror. Same I did with Wrath Vs Conqueror.

I do not say that Ultimate is bad tactic, it has some advantages against conqueror, IF are more dangerous tham MR ML in conqueror, the have more space and better shot angle.

But defence in Conqueror, with MR ML that helps in defense to FB, and FC that has manual marking and makes 451 in defense is more superior than anything this year.

As some people know
I have won Champions League and World club cup with Partizan Belgrade (in 5 seasons)
Have won Champions League and World club cup with St Gallen (in 4 seasons)

All it pretty easy, with conqueror.

Now I have experiment with Pyunik (Armeni) 1 of 4 worst league in Europe. And conquereor still works incredible, i have try lot of times with Ultimate, but it is not even close in OVERARCHING.

Just to ilustrate that in one exampe:

CL qualification 3x stronger opponent, I have played first match with ultimete, easy lost 0:2 home against Basel
so I used conqueror in away match and guess what:

View attachment 1042694

No this was not a luck, a have played 3x times with conqueror, and have 2 wins, 1 draw.
Than I have had played same match 3x times with ultimate and again 3 easy lost games.

Just to say, I have **** player, CA 90-100, no one wants to come to Armenia, even from Costa Rica, Guatemala leagues...

And important thing, my team suits better for Ultimate, than for Qonqueror, but in both fluid tactics this was hapened..and it was not first time that i have tried both tactic for same match.


My concluson, I know that manual marking is borring for people, but that is the thing that makes your team overarchiving.
So TFF I thing that u can make more superior tactic based just on Qonqueror.\

Cheers mate!

i'm with you on this one... ive tried both Wrath and Ultimate and they are nowhere near to Conqueror (im still using V2)
 
OMG!! how did u get all this money ? FMRTE right ?
no mate, first: dortmund is a rich club,
2:on this fm its very esay to buy players if you use monthly installments, so for exmple, i have sign hazard the deal was 115 mil, but i only paid 65 upfront, i have also sold players, i would say that 7 out from 10 will agree your offer if u do it wise. i have also wanted to sign neymar and barca hace agree to my offer, but he didint wants to sign.
 
my defence is amazing, i have conceded 10 goals in 22 league matches, and scored 94
 
TFF, u know that I am great fan of your tactics...

I have try wrath, and ultimate, played same matches with total fluid tactic Ultimate Vs Conqueror V5, always far away better results were with Conqueror. Same I did with Wrath Vs Conqueror.

I do not say that Ultimate is bad tactic, it has some advantages against conqueror, IF are more dangerous tham MR ML in conqueror, the have more space and better shot angle.

But defence in Conqueror, with MR ML that helps in defense to FB, and FC that has manual marking and makes 451 in defense is more superior than anything this year.

As some people know
I have won Champions League and World club cup with Partizan Belgrade (in 5 seasons)
Have won Champions League and World club cup with St Gallen (in 4 seasons)

All it pretty easy, with conqueror.

Now I have experiment with Pyunik (Armeni) 1 of 4 worst league in Europe. And conquereor still works incredible, i have try lot of times with Ultimate, but it is not even close in OVERARCHING.

Just to ilustrate that in one exampe:

CL qualification 3x stronger opponent, I have played first match with ultimete, easy lost 0:2 home against Basel
so I used conqueror in away match and guess what:

View attachment 1042694

No this was not a luck, a have played 3x times with conqueror, and have 2 wins, 1 draw.
Than I have had played same match 3x times with ultimate and again 3 easy lost games.

Just to say, I have **** player, CA 90-100, no one wants to come to Armenia, even from Costa Rica, Guatemala leagues...

And important thing, my team suits better for Ultimate, than for Qonqueror, but in both fluid tactics this was hapened..and it was not first time that i have tried both tactic for same match.


My concluson, I know that manual marking is borring for people, but that is the thing that makes your team overarchiving.
So TFF I thing that u can make more superior tactic based just on Qonqueror.\

Cheers mate!

You got a link to the filters that go with Conqueror V5?
 
Back
Top