Wide AMC positions on support are so dominant in wide areas with IWB coming close to themgood first impression here too
I think I will call it no10 tactic!
next week coming home
31 I am going to apartment in center of Buines aires to drink party and **** some girls.
then next monday flying back to home
The latest tactic "TEST1_3_AT_BACK" is quite simply the best tactic made so far for this version of the ME. You've absolutely smashed it out the park here. Bravo. Bravo.
It's fantastic as is. I would be very reluctant to change anything. Iv'e played with it across 4 seasons and absolutely smashed it with favourites, underdogs and plugged it into teams that don't have suitable players and it's still over performed.planning to release it officially with name no10 tactic due to 3 atacking midfielders!
still waiting for more feedbacks for potential minor tweaks if need
Just thinking out loud, what about if you man marked with one or two wide AMC's? Would they track back and stay with the mezzala? Don't know if it would impact going forward?Here is a problem I found playing against 442 diamond,the mezzala on the right cuting inside and making numerical advantage on the right side constantly during the game,I am trying to reduce the gap now with higher defensive line but our 3 CB are needed to be very skilfull because during the game they constantly fighting one vs one and often 4 against 3 when like on this picture mezzala come in
working on the tweak against this formation
View attachment 638818
That was the first thing I have tried to be honest,it was working but opposition was changing positions all the time between left and right MC and it was so hard to fallow it but i found solution by putting down our 2 wide AMC on CM playing them on attack gave me result against this 442 diamondJust thinking out loud, what about if you man marked with one or two wide AMC's? Would they track back and stay with the mezzala? Don't know if it would impact going forward?