whats wrong with 4-4-2?

[Gatid]

4-4-2 Formation is probs the most reliable formation thier is for HOME and AWAY games -

I mean every formation has its 'Advantages' and 'disadvantages' for example -

4-4-2(Advantages)

-Has full-backs and wingers running down the flanks which really helps if you got quality players that can cross a ball.
-Having two strikers upfront instead of one which is a handful for defenders.
-Also 4-4-2 is probs the only formation that really works effectively at home and away games without changing your tactics or player instructions at all.

4-4-2(disadvantages)

-To be honest i cant really think of one.

Mind you all your formations, Player instructions, and etc doesnt really matter its all down to your team instructions and your players.

NO POINT playing a short passing game with high tempo like arsenal in real life when they dominate games and pass and move all around the opponant's area if your going to be a team like BOLTON when they have players who are like STRONG and like to play direct and force thier way into goal.

My personal opinion 4-4-2 formation IS THE BEST BY FAR

Before you write a bad comment just think of the things i wrote on this page is it true or not?
sorry for the layout.

 

[steaua bucharest]

in FM09 u cant make the MR AND ML to go attack right up near forwards that one disadvantage...(arrows only go 1 space ahead)

but thats lame...there are no disadvantages its the greatest tactic

 

[Willster]

442 is easy to play against with a 451 counter attack which switches to 433 when attacking. So its not the best. So your outnumbered in midfield which is usually where games are won and lost.
Willster

 

[Scholesyo]

I've always considered 4-4-2 to b the best aswell, I would only usually change formations when my team r on a bad run of form where I HAVE to change things