Passenaccio
Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2014
- Messages
- 288
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I said Barcelona received it's more than fair amount of biased referees. Referees are also humans, so naturally they have a favorite team. The last years the whole world was caught up in this "tiki-taka" BS, and that caused the favoritism by referees. Chelsea eliminated them from the semi's in 2012 because they did what was needed to cancel their play style, not because the referees helped them or refused to help Barcelona.
I never said Barcelona are UEFA's favourite. You twisted my words for your likeing. I said referees are biased.
At this WC on the other hand, Brazil seems to have biased referees every single game.
I do not have the figures in front of me but when Real Madrid are in the knock out stages they help generate far more sponsorship money for Uefa. So yes Real are more favoured by Uefa for the monetary gain as I said by a long mile.
Lets not detract from a World Cup thread.
Back to Brazil. As I said they have the home advantage so to some it may look like they have the refs bias but if that was so then Hulk's goal would of probably been allowed to stand against Chile. The foul against Neymar went unpunished and now he has a fractured vertebrae last night. That's just two examples of the referee not being biased but more the fact that a majority of reffereeing has been below par this whole World Cup.
If all the refs were biased to Brazil like you say then that is factually incorrect.