4-1-2-3 Unbeatable Engine Exploiter by Hazza22299

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hazza22299
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 1K
  • Views Views 1M
Pezz96 said:
WHAT A TACTIC!!!. Have only tried this for two games, with Matlock in the Evo-Stik and won 3-1(at home) and 5-1(away), as well as this the tactic is nowhere near fluid yet and I am also trying to get 2 other tactics fluid, and my team is also a crock of dogshite so all I can say is good work
Click to expand...

Thanks, I think everyone can now see it does well with lower league teams, I did it with Chester myself and it worked a charm.
 
DeNe95 said:
Hazza i'll be honest, in the beggining i was very very bad. The tactic didn't work as it should, but now im more then happy for downloading the tactic. Im managing QPR and with honestly shity players im dominating almost every game. Ofc against bigger teams im mostly beeing pushed back and waiting for the counter but the 3 strikers are doing their job very well. I've seen that some people say that you "stole" the tactic or something but that shouldn't bother you. You said everything in the description and you answered to almost every reply on the thread! Im very thankfull for this tactic and i apreciate your attention for every reply.
P.S. sorry for my english, it's my 3rd language :/
Click to expand...

Thank you very much, I'm glad the tactic is working for you now, it may have been because your team wasn't used to the tactic at first. Well done.
 
ok cheers, so the "original" tactic was made in classic mode and used match engine exploits already and he claims to be a man of the world and only recreating "real world tactics" hhmmmm........ not trying to open up a debate, merely commenting on what was thrown at me earlier..

as someone said earlier, you take away the corner bug and you do not score that many goals from open play.. on this one or the original :) no offence to anyone at all, its just my opinion on the tactic!

Would like to see a "real" tactic from the two of you :) no exploits, using the modern creator! Hazza, I think you can produce a good one, why not try and make one from scratch, people know who you are now and will try it :)

cheers, Neil
 
Raikan007 said:
Would like to see a "real" tactic from the two of you :) no exploits, using the modern creator! Hazza, I think you can produce a good one, why not try and make one from scratch, people know who you are now and will try it :)

cheers, Neil
Click to expand...

Yes - I am looking in to this now. Thanks for the feedback Raikan.
 
Hazza,

Im playing with a mid-table Premiership team and it definitley feels weird slammin my team when we've got ourself a 3-0 lead at half-time away from home. Same goes when im in front when playin a top four club.

So: Should I despite my worries just follow your instruction and if im not up 5-0 at half-time I should always chose "Aggressive: not happy etc"?
 
Fulhamswede said:
Hazza,

Im playing with a mid-table Premiership team and it definitley feels weird slammin my team when we've got ourself a 3-0 lead at half-time away from home. Same goes when im in front when playin a top four club.

So: Should I despite my worries just follow your instruction and if im not up 5-0 at half-time I should always chose "Aggressive: not happy etc"?
Click to expand...

I know I felt weird doing that as well but it probably doesn't matter if you tell them to passionately keep it up instead. The team talks thing wasn't my suggestion but someone on this thread mentioned it.
 
Hi Hazza, big problem i've found with this tactic, its waaaay to good haha :D
 
cragswfc said:
are you ticking the play-maker as when i download its not ticked?
Click to expand...

I do think that ticking the playmaker and choosing one can help but we found out about it after posting this tactic. It probably doesn't work with every team but if you have a good one it is suggested.
 
Hazza22299 said:
I do think that ticking the playmaker and choosing one can help but we found out about it after posting this tactic. It probably doesn't work with every team but if you have a good one it is suggested.
Click to expand...
so do you think it just as good with out it? all so would stveie g be any good?
 
Hazza22299 said:
I do think that ticking the playmaker and choosing one can help but we found out about it after posting this tactic. It probably doesn't work with every team but if you have a good one it is suggested.
Click to expand...

It works if you have good players for this. I've found that when you play 4-4-2 or 3-5-2, you get out numbered in the midfield and some tight marking can make you loose the ball (it happens regularly). When you have playmakers, you will get more possession, but it comes with a price. What is your experience? What if you put the right and left strikers as playmakers!?
 
apvmoreira said:
It works if you have good players for this. I've found that when you play 4-4-2 or 3-5-2, you get out numbered in the midfield and some tight marking can make you loose the ball (it happens regularly). When you have playmakers, you will get more possession, but it comes with a price. What is your experience? What if you put the right and left strikers as playmakers!?
Click to expand...

When one of wide strikers gets sent off, which is quite frequent as with my dmc, I tried setting my remaining wide striker as play maker and the central striker as target man run on to through balls, the thinking was that the team would win back possession quickly look to get the ball to the wide striker and he would look to play in the target man.
Seems to work as I still score when a man down!
I'm burnham fc in my 5th season, I don't use play maker or target man any other time, I'm currently top of the blue Square south, struggled for a bit but some shrewed signings in pre season seem to have got the tactic working well, the corner thing is almost non exsintant in this team as no one can header!
 
SMcManus84 said:
When one of wide strikers gets sent off, which is quite frequent as with my dmc, I tried setting my remaining wide striker as play maker and the central striker as target man run on to through balls, the thinking was that the team would win back possession quickly look to get the ball to the wide striker and he would look to play in the target man.
Seems to work as I still score when a man down!
I'm burnham fc in my 5th season, I don't use play maker or target man any other time, I'm currently top of the blue Square south, struggled for a bit but some shrewed signings in pre season seem to have got the tactic working well, the corner thing is almost non exsintant in this team as no one can header!
Click to expand...

If it works when you have a man down, why don't you use it more often?

Btw, when I'm a man down, i take of the central striker. The team still defends very well and when you attack from the left or the right, the other side striker will play the center strike roll pretty well, along with one of the MC's (made after the sent off the target man).
Tried this when winning 0-1 and finish the game getting 0-4!

Will try that playmaker thing tonight
 
apvmoreira said:
If it works when you have a man down, why don't you use it more often?

Btw, when I'm a man down, i take of the central striker. The team still defends very well and when you attack from the left or the right, the other side striker will play the center strike roll pretty well, along with one of the MC's (made after the sent off the target man).
Tried this when winning 0-1 and finish the game getting 0-4!

Will try that playmaker thing tonight
Click to expand...

Just because the original tactic didn't use a TM or play maker and i wasn't getting results so thought I'd change to not using them, results seem to get better but to be honest this could just be coincidence, getting better players and better morale??
My thinking was my players were so poor that singling out these players as a TM or PM wouldn't be a good idea and that letting the team find chances itself would be better?
That said in a man u game I tested this with, completely un-fluid just changed to it before a game I beat arsenal 6-1 and Rooney scored 5, TM and PM unticked.(1 goal from a corner )
 
SMcManus84 said:
Just because the original tactic didn't use a TM or play maker and i wasn't getting results so thought I'd change to not using them, results seem to get better but to be honest this could just be coincidence, getting better players and better morale??
My thinking was my players were so poor that singling out these players as a TM or PM wouldn't be a good idea and that letting the team find chances itself would be better?
That said in a man u game I tested this with, completely un-fluid just changed to it before a game I beat arsenal 6-1 and Rooney scored 5, TM and PM unticked.(1 goal from a corner )
Click to expand...

I also use the original tactic, witch don't use TM or PM. It works very well, specially against bigger teams (maybe because man marking, dunno - too much changed).

But, if the team instructions are set to attack by the flanks, using the MCs as PM, will eventually spread your game?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top