I've tested this tactic on my YT channel and all I can say is WOW! This is the best tactic I've ever tested, West Ham were a couple wins away from winning the QUADRUPLE! Amazing 10/10. I've also subbed to your YT channel
Last edited:
You can check the sheet on my signature,if you need more infos you are free to join discord ^^I tested it with Dortmund . No holiday bullshit. Holiday tests are not real testing of a tactic.
Its a good tactic . In every new save in FM23 the first two seasons are awful. You get FMed once in a tree games. Injuries and all that.
Its just the stupid match engine that SI gives us for a i don't know what year in a row ,but...
So this is Dortmund , with your tactic . No holiday.
Can you answer which is your BEST tactic on FM23 , because i see that there a lots of your tactics.
View attachment 633566View attachment 633567View attachment 633568View attachment 633569View attachment 633570View attachment 633571View attachment 633572View attachment 633573
You can't even check on the sheet ?I don't have discord . And i will never do. So just tell me which one is your best tactic and i will test it. Dortmund are the ideal team for tactic testing. They have good squad ,but fail to win anything every season. so if you do it with them , you can do it with every single average to top team.
Problem is really simple and understanble for common sense, which is not your case as i do understand, have fun to find-out with a "save" which one is better from another.you can't even answer a simple question like what is your best tactic ?
Ok than. Good tactic this one.
Cheers !
Because i got 8 players injured for that game which include my GK , Malen my second striker , my best DL and my best CD. As i said , FM23 is the worst one they put out , but when having no competition in manager games ,they can put out whatever **** they want. It was like this throughout the whole season. But that is what normal testing gives you. Thats why i don't test in holiday mode. So people coming in your thread or someone else's can see what the tactic or tactics truly gives you.You don't need skyrocket tactic to win with any team,there are many more factors, which is why for some reason you did lost 0-3 at home vs R.Madrid and won away.
Because i got 8 players injured for that game which include my GK , Malen my second striker , my best DL and my best CD. As i said , FM23 is the worst one they put out , but when having no competition in manager games ,they can put out whatever **** they want. It was like this throughout the whole season. But that is what normal testing gives you. Thats why i don't test in holiday mode. So people coming in your thread or someone else's can see what the tactic or tactics truly gives you.
Here are screens from that game...as you can see there is no reason why should i lost that game by 0-3 , but they scored 2 long shot goals due to no first choice GK.
View attachment 633651View attachment 633652
If you find the question what tactic you thinks is your best ,for stupid , than ok . I will move to other tactic to test.
And i don't do tactic testing with one team. So whatever the tactic is , i find a team which is suitable for the tactic i test and its a mid or subtop team so it can show how the tactic makes the team overcome their odds .
I don't check spreadsheets ,because there are 100 tactics with 100 results , i ask the creator which one he thinks is the best , to check it properly and give feedback.
Keep up the good work.
Cheers.
4231 Structura X | 4231W | Delicious | Balanced | No | 57 | 9 | 35 | 22 | 3600 |
41221-XMAS for All III | 41221 x-m | Delicious | Balanced | No | 57 | 6 | 36 | 21 | 1440 |
4231 Structura VIII | 4231W | Delicious | Balanced | No | 57 | 8 | 35 | 21 | 3600 |
4231 Structura IX | 4231W | Delicious | Balanced | No | 56 | 8 | 36 | 21 | 3600 |
41221-XMAS for All II | 41221 x-m | Delicious | Balanced | No | 56 | 7 | 36 | 20 | 1440 |
41221-XMAS for All III OI | 41221 x-m | Delicious | Balanced | Yes | 56 | 7 | 36 | 20 | 3600 |
41122W Racelicious II | 41122W | Delicious | Balanced | No | 56 | 3 | 34 | 20 | 1400 |
i am giving one more season with this tactic and Dortmund and then i will move to 4231 Structura X with another team.
Will give update at some point and still i don't think asking the creator which one of his tactics performs the best with every team he tested them with is stupid question , but its your opinion so...
Second season so far...
Bare in mind my oldest player in starting 11 is Malen who is 24 and not the best in the world so...Some mistakes here and there , but thats to squad being so young and no experienced players to help them.
View attachment 633801View attachment 633802View attachment 633803View attachment 633804View attachment 633805View attachment 633806View attachment 633807
Puoi provare due vie : O fai rotazioni pesanti, oppure fai tasto destro sul giocatore e lo fai riposare 2/3 giorni.@DeliciousStory sto utilizzando questa tattica e mi trovo molto bene considerando che col Parma al primo anno in Serie A mi sono qualificato in Champion, nel secondo a febbraio sono terzo in serie A e agli spareggi Champions, ho notato solo che i giocatori, giocando ogni 3 giorni sono molto stanchi, ho settato allenamenti cadoni 2 match e messo a riposo i giocatori come da te sostenuto, ma capira che crollano, devo magari selezionare altro tipo intensità allenamento?
Depends, if i am facing city/pool i tend to start with cautious and check how the games develophi mate, im now trying this out with my brighton save, do you always leave mentality on balance??
I will try it with cautious next time i face big team and share how it went.Did you tried to play cautious with elite teams? results seem ok, even tho i don't like to lose at home![]()
Hello skin pleaseSecond season so far...
Bare in mind my oldest player in starting 11 is Malen who is 24 and not the best in the world so...Some mistakes here and there , but thats to squad being so young and no experienced players to help them.
View attachment 633801View attachment 633802View attachment 633803View attachment 633804View attachment 633805View attachment 633806View attachment 633807