Fusershift
Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2014
- Messages
- 277
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Care to explain how they're wrong?
Not sure about the other 2, but rashidi is one that I would trust almost implicitly.
Do you have any more context to share on your approach, things like what you change in game to react to opposition, how you develop players, how can roles be changed?
You seem to have invested a lot of time, energy and passion into the game, so I'm interested to understand how you piece it together to win. I imagine your win percentage is pretty impressive?
Care to explain how they're wrong?
Okay, if you insist, let me take aim at the fish in a barrel.On the contrary. in 2011, when I set myself on the quest to learn football tactics, I've been like a sponge. Absorbing everything anyone of importance have said. Reading blogs, newspaper articles, forums, sites, everything I could get my hands on. And as I learned, I tested what I learned. Over 10000 hours of testing tactics since then, everything that made sense and what did not. That process isn't over, this is just the conclusion so far. And I was struggling real hard and ragequitting on a regular basis, only to return with a new idea to test. And then finally sticky cleared up the mess, and everything started working as it should. I'm not sure where I learned that attack duties will occuppy a spot higher, that defend duties will stay put, and support move around, but when I combined that with rules from sticky, and TI's that I learned from watching the sliders move as I changed shouts, I got a final product. And it works how it is intended to work, naturally. I learned everything should scale properly, one option with another, like a puzzle. And it was a long and nerves costly process. Which is why I'm not buying anyone elses advice anymore. I simply know better than they do.
They test something and it works, and they talk about it. Then I read about it, test it with 10 different teams, ranging from england to indonesia, top, medium, and low clubs, and it turns out it does work, but only with 7 out of 10 teams, for example. Then I analyse why it didn't work with others, and the result is almost always the same. It was unnatural. Pushing up in a counter tactic, or shorter passing with agressive mentality for example. I make changes, and it works with 10 out of 10 teams.
I call complete and utter bullshit. There will be reasons for you failing with it. Provide examples of their inaccuracies, please.They test something and it works, and they talk about it. Then I read about it, test it with 10 different teams, ranging from england to indonesia, top, medium, and low clubs, and it turns out it does work, but only with 7 out of 10 teams, for example. Then I analyse why it didn't work with others, and the result is almost always the same. It was unnatural. Pushing up in a counter tactic, or shorter passing with agressive mentality for example. I make changes, and it works with 10 out of 10 teams.
Like I said, it's an attack tactic, and it will work against teams defending from you.
No idea what that means.
Anyway, you said the B2Bs move to DM and the WPs to CM. That's not what happens. The formation you set is the defensive shape. The WPs stay wide and the B2Bs stay at CM, until your closing down settings kick in very deep in your half. Still, there's almost always a gap between the lines.
It means it is most suitable to average fourth season, when you earn rep, and have great players and everyone defends from you. Stop bullshiting me.
It means it is most suitable to average fourth season, when you earn rep, and have great players and everyone defends from you. Stop bullshiting me. Plug it into your long term save if you have one and test.
So 4th season as a dominant team only against very defensive teams? Is that why you chose to show a result from a game from season 1 and a team slightly weaker at home who won't sit back that much?
All good. I'll wait for your next alias, Gorstak. Be a little less obvious next time.I'm done here. Back to ignore list both of you
I'm done here. Back to ignore list both of you