Bluth's 16.3 Tweak

  • Thread starter Thread starter GobBluthJD
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 873
  • Views Views 352K
I'm disguisted - lost almost a season I thought I saved it, but apparently i didn't so I'm an idiot - around 7 hours lost - I also know why it crashes - stupid Geforce experiment downloading drivers - makes my memory run low which i have 16 off jeeeeez

I will start it up again but for now i just need to cut the loss and focus on something else in the mean time
 
bsup68 said:
I wonder if Bluth could make a 2 striker tactic, working as well as this one does, judged by all the nice results posted. I wonder if it could be done by changeing the AMC......
Click to expand...

The AMC is key for the tactic, always floating around, making a mess for the defense to try and deal with. I wouldn't want to lose him in order to gain another striker, as I don't think the payoff would be worth it. Will have to start a whole new 2-striker tactic... ;)
 
I3east said:
Decided to start a lower league challenge with this tactic and went with Sheffield FC. The media predicts us to finish 10th and i had virtually no funds available to strengthen my squad but going well so far!

n14cag.png
Click to expand...

Well, that's looking good (H)
 
GobBluthJD said:
The AMC is key for the tactic, always floating around, making a mess for the defense to try and deal with. I wouldn't want to lose him in order to gain another striker, as I don't think the payoff would be worth it. Will have to start a whole new 2-striker tactic... ;)
Click to expand...

hmm kinda suspected that, would have been too easy then - maybe i should make that my next project after my vurrent work in progress that be ;)
 
bsup68 said:
hmm kinda suspected that, would have been too easy then - maybe i should make that my next project after my vurrent work in progress that be ;)
Click to expand...

How about adding another midfielder instead of a striker - I could see that work - plenty of 442's already or 2 trequartistas :) now that would interesting
 
jesaustralia said:
How about adding another midfielder instead of a striker - I could see that work - plenty of 442's already or 2 trequartistas :) now that would interesting
Click to expand...

3 in the middle or 2 Treqs would be interesting...not sure who I would want to give up for that though :P
 
GobBluthJD said:
3 in the middle or 2 Treqs would be interesting...not sure who I would want to give up for that though :P
Click to expand...

I would only give up the striker for my suggestion - though the striker works really well in your tactic - thats the only position I can see sacrificed for something else - for the sake of balance :)
 
jesaustralia said:
As for now I feel Gobbluth original tactic shouldn't be touched - I play with original to see how things pan out - When that is said defensive mentality using Barca did well, but I don't think its the sweet spot - I think standard or control is where we wanna go in order to get optimal success in general - all tactics.
Click to expand...
what you using for general and match prep training
 
jesaustralia said:
Right time to some Conclusion of the defend mentality using this wonderful tactic.

Images comes first:

Table

View attachment 1057793

Fixtures

View attachment 1057794

View attachment 1057795

CH final

View attachment 1057796

Rafinha

View attachment 1057797

Rakitic

View attachment 1057799

Suarez

View attachment 1057800

Other players did great too - the weakest position was the central defence, but that could be taken care off by buying some quality ones.

Now in my opinion this was highly successful and probably many other tactics would not be able to replicate this maybe this thread has something - 8-|

I normally don't look Rafinha and Rakitic way, but my assman loves them lol and look at how consistant they were - hands down overlooked players by me. Suarez did good Messi and Neymar did good - they are all above average rate 8, but this wasn't why I tested I wanted to discover the mentality dedensive - noone ever uses it - in my opinion a mistake - myself included in that equation - its wonderful and I can only wonder what would happen if my team would have had 3-4 top notch signings (defence,central midfield) - now you have the information - we really need to know what happens if we go attacking - same team doing its same thing and ofcourse in a later test we should also check this with standard and maybe control. Who wanted contain lollol - Jeez :)

Their you have it

Cheers

View attachment 1057804
Click to expand...

You meen instead of standard mentality Defensive mentality?
 
Dalum update season 2

I applied to become the manager of France u/21 and got the job. Qualified for Euro 2016 u/21.
View attachment 145845View attachment 145844
Media predicted Dalum to place 4th in group phase this season, and club goal was to avoid relegation phase.
View attachment 145843
Finished 2nd. Had a good start to the league, but the last 5 games ended in 4 losses and 1 draw.....
Still keeping my hopes high of promoting or winning the league, but Aarhus Fremad seems unbeatable.
 
cragswfc said:
what you using for general and match prep training
Click to expand...

General - I use team cohesion or fitness in all teams that I manage

Match prep. - depends on the opponents quality - Attacking movement most often - only if opponent is alot better I would go defensive positioning but even then you wouldn't stand alot of chances winning a match like that - so it wouldn't matter much if you kept it on attacking movement. If the teams are very equal - like in lower league england 6th and 5th division - its definitely attacking movement - I'm speaking of experience - I tried defensive positioning - I didn't like it. If you get back to back promotions many years in a row - you need to consider defensive positioning the better the players off your opponents become - unless your team improve with the promotions then you keep it the same.

cheers
 
jesaustralia said:
How about adding another midfielder instead of a striker - I could see that work - plenty of 442's already or 2 trequartistas :) now that would interesting
Click to expand...

Already working on one with 3 CMs + wings and striker. but it wasn't a flat 442 i had/have in mind, more like a 4-2-2-2 2CMs+2 Wings
 
bsup68 said:
Already working on one with 3 CMs + wings and striker. but it wasn't a flat 442 i had/have in mind, more like a 4-2-2-2 2CMs+2 Wings
Click to expand...


That one sounds interesting ;) The original is working so well for me still that I haven't tried any tweaks like that, but it would be fun to see how you get on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top