I prefer the ideology of socialism, but whichever system is in place doesn't really matter when it's almost always at the behest of corrupt individuals and groups working the system to their goals.
Oh you and your conspiracies. XD
I prefer the ideology of socialism, but whichever system is in place doesn't really matter when it's almost always at the behest of corrupt individuals and groups working the system to their goals.
My opinion is you a Tory *****. Privatise the NHS more? You serious, spend six months in the USA and you'd realise pure capitalism doesn't work.
You OP is pathetic, socialism and capitalism are black and white, real life is grey.
Also if you think more "socialist" countries are all failures then look at Denmark.
Tory cu*t.
I believe in a welfare system for health, education etc for those less fortunate or experiencing difficulties.
What I can't abide are these unemployed cider swigging chavs on Jeremy Kyle who have made a lifestyle choice to live on benefits and line Mike Ashley's pockets by spending my tax dollars on reebok classics & Lonsdale sweats.
South Africa and Botswana have to be the two best examples of it's success in Africa.
My opinion is you a Tory *****. Privatise the NHS more? You serious, spend six months in the USA and you'd realise pure capitalism doesn't work.
You OP is pathetic, socialism and capitalism are black and white, real life is grey.
Also if you think more "socialist" countries are all failures then look at Denmark.
Tory cu*t.
Jesus calm down.
There are parts of the NHS that are already privatized and a mix could increase efficiency.
Denmark has higher taxes and a greater distribution through social services than most but is certainly not socialist.
next one gets you a 3 day ban. grow upMy opinion is you a Tory *****. Privatise the NHS more? You serious, spend six months in the USA and you'd realise pure capitalism doesn't work.
You OP is pathetic, socialism and capitalism are black and white, real life is grey.
Also if you think more "socialist" countries are all failures then look at Denmark.
Tory cu*t.
No need to be so abusive over someone's opinion....
We have a democracy here so that people can voice their opinions on how the government is run.
No need to be so abusive over someone's opinion....
We have a democracy here so that people can voice their opinions on how the government is run.
Well I don't think they record levels of youth unemployed who are demonstrating to overthrow autocratic dictators with £10m houses in London would agree.
I prefer the ideology of socialism, but whichever system is in place doesn't really matter when it's almost always at the behest of corrupt individuals and groups working the system to their goals.
Well it kinda does... as in theory with communism money is distributed equally.... (this most of the times is really not the case as a lot of current communist countries are quite corrupt) so if the place is poor everyone is poor..... where as it the place happened to be rich.... then the people would have decent amounts of money.
My opinion is you a Tory *****. Privatise the NHS more? You serious, spend six months in the USA and you'd realise pure capitalism doesn't work.
You OP is pathetic, socialism and capitalism are black and white, real life is grey.
Also if you think more "socialist" countries are all failures then look at Denmark.
Tory cu*t.
Denmark is a social democracy which in effect is a mixture if socialism and capitalism, although more on the socialist side than say UK or USA.
Your right about partial privatization of the NHS, which I believe was a huge mistake on the part of the last Govt.
My opinion is you a Tory *****. Privatise the NHS more? You serious, spend six months in the USA and you'd realise pure capitalism doesn't work.
You OP is pathetic, socialism and capitalism are black and white, real life is grey.
Also if you think more "socialist" countries are all failures then look at Denmark.
Tory cu*t.
freedom of speech has always enshrined that, right from the very beginning. freedom of speech has never meant you say absolutely anything. This is a very common misconception. Nor does freedom of speech apply to what wikileaks has done in any way, shape or formYeah they can voice their opinions as long as it doesn't hurt anyone or makes them sad. The freedom of speech is kind of pathetic nowadays.
Just look at something like wikileaks and how much controversy it stirs up. People getting brought in front of a judge for showing the truth, it's disgusting.
The most countries we live in are considered democracies right? In my mind, the meaning of that word is that the country is ruled by the people who live in it. How the **** does that make sense when the government can hide the truth from us whenever they want.
It's as said before, with the corrupt leadership in (I guess all really) many countries, there's no such thing as criticizing the government, if you say something they don't want you to say, they can quiet you down.
Gotta love it.
Denmark is a social democracy which in effect is a mixture if socialism and capitalism, although more on the socialist side than say UK or USA.
Your right about partial privatization of the NHS, which I believe was a huge mistake on the part of the last Govt.
freedom of speech has always enshrined that, right from the very beginning. freedom of speech has never meant you say absolutely anything. This is a very common misconception. Nor does freedom of speech apply to what wikileaks has done in any way, shape or form
freedom of speech, like any other freedom is not, has never been, and never will be absolute in practice. they are all limited by each other and the laws that govern us.Then what is freedom of speech if it does not give you the freedom to speak?
freedom of speech, like any other freedom is not, has never been, and never will be absolute in practice. they are all limited by each other and the laws that govern us.