It is one thing im glad Chelsea did, our acadamy has greatly improved and Roman has put alot of money into it but i dont see City doing this.
City actually have a very good academy, you're profiting from one example with Sturridge, but it seems to have been forgotten amongst all the spending
• A new Academy for up to 400 young players with classrooms for 200
• On site accommodation for junior and senior players
• 16 football pitches, up to 12 of them dedicated to players aged from 8 to 18
• A state of the art first team building with changing rooms, gym, refectory and injury and rehab centre
• A 7,000 capacity stadium for youth matches
• Staff offices and a dedicated media centre
• A bridge linking the site to the Etihad Stadium and the rest of the Etihad Campus
I dont think Cantona have heard of Citys recent plans regarding the academy.
Consultation process for development of the Etihad Campus at the Etihad Stadium begins. - Manchester City FC
City have always had a good acedemy tbh. Players like Richards, Onouha, Ireland, Sturridge...
Couldn't you argue the case that Studge came from Cov/Villa and City gave him his first team break? I'm not really clear on what the rules are on 'making' a player but yes City do have a good academy.
He's been at City since he is 13 IIRC, so i'd put the bulk of the credit on them
Except city already have a very good academy, thats just extra gloss, but you seemingly have little intention of bringing them into the first team
For now...because there aren't any very good players close to coming through the academy now. Only Boyata and maybe Weiss.
City need to spend less every year because the squad is very competive and young. Next summer for example...i dont think City will need any players, unless some players leave...they will need to replace them. While City have signed a few promising kids this summer.
Mancini has to think more short-term and keep the squad competive at present. He doesn't care if there is a 16-year old promising kid coming through because he wont be any use to him for the next 4 years...you know. He could be sacked by then.
It's the club that has to think long-term and the academy is part of the long-term plan. And hopefully the academy will produce and train some good players who can replace some of the first-teamers in the future.
theres a kid called kieran kennedy coming through, was a year younger than my bro and used to play against him and dominate the games, plays for the reserves at 17 bright future!
City actually have a very good academy, you're profiting from one example with Sturridge, but it seems to have been forgotten amongst all the spending
There are plenty of promising players coming through, one thing city used to do is give them the chance, that has changed dramatically.
Mancini has to think long and short term, thats his job as the manager. Thats no excuse.
You have had Onuha and the like break through, they are certainly good players, and you've swept them aside, willing to sell them off
No, i dont think there are any CLOSE to coming through. Boyata and Weiss yes. Onuoha is decent. But he is not good enough to start for City. But i dont think he would be a worse squad player than someone like O'Shea or Brown was for United.
Then again....i think Mancini wants to get ridd of him because he slagged Mancini off last season publicly in some ******* Soccer AM interview lol. And thats something unacceptable.
But seriously...can't think of any other players who is close to the quality to play for City now. Some promising 16-18 year olds yes.
For now...because there aren't any very good players close to coming through the academy now. Only Boyata and maybe Weiss.
City need to spend less every year because the squad is very competive and young. Next summer for example...i dont think City will need any players, unless some players leave...they will need to replace them. While City have signed a few promising kids this summer.
Mancini has to think more short-term and keep the squad competive at present. He doesn't care if there is a 16-year old promising kid coming through because he wont be any use to him for the next 4 years...you know. He could leave or get sacked by then.
It's the club that has to think long-term and the academy is part of the long-term plan. And hopefully the academy will produce and train some good players who can replace some of the first-teamers in the future.