DEMOLISHER !

v7 scores a lot of goals but it's conceding a goal or two on average. most games are ending in 3-2 and 4-3.
 
Last edited:
HortonFM said:
v7 scores a lot of goals but it's conceding a goal or two on average. most games are ending in 3-2 and 4-3.
Click to expand...

Ok, I see... just winning matches isn't enough for you and to satisfy you a tactic must score 10 goals every match and concede 0... :)

Btw, for me it works great defensively I don’t notice that I concede any extra goals
 
Mikeyokeyy said:
Ok, I see... just winning matches isn't enough for you and to satisfy you a tactic must score 10 goals every match and concede 0... :)

Btw, for me it works great defensively I don’t notice that I concede any extra goals
Click to expand...

You must be very dumb. A 1-0 win is better than a 6-5 victory. Strikers form is temporary while defensive problems are harder to fix. 6-5 is a better watch but a 1-0 is a bigger victory. It shows you're resilient and hard to beat. It seems with this tactic any team can come to your ground knowing they can atleast slot a goal past you.

Dont get me wrong this is a GREAT tactic it just needs some defensive tweaking IMO.
 
Last edited:
TotalFootballFan9 said:
*******

THE STRIKERLESS TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V6

THE STRIKER TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V7


Guys, this update puts the tactic's performance on a complete different level, it produces the best result that I've had in FM17 by far so I strongly suggest that you go for it.


Also, please notice that you cant add "Easy Off Tackles" PI to the new BWM(S) role of MCR position so if your BWM(S) gets booked during a match then change his role to CM(S) and "Easy Off Tackles" PI.





CHANGES :

- changed the roles and PIs of MCL/MCR positions

- tweaked the closing down settings of AMCL/AMC/AMCR/ positions

- tweaked the dribbling settings of AMCL/AMCR/WBL/WBR positions

- tweaked the passing settings of WBL/WBR positions










​
Click to expand...



Holly Cow! :)

Here's my result with Watford so far, the 1st season, I simply annihilate teams with the new version, it's pure madness :O


dddf644.png

3434jjj.png
 
Lojo87 said:
I'm trying the new versions with Southamton and after 23 matches played in the league I scored 61 goals and conceded 17... If you'd ask me then I'd say it's perfect :)

dw2322dhhhh.png
Click to expand...

I must be extremely unlucky then
 
Overall this tactic is fantastic but I'm confused with the PPM for MCR...which would be a good move to have for that position? Are they similar to MCL?
 
*******



THE STRIKERLESS TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V7

THE STRIKER TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V8

THE PPMS FOR MCR POSITIONS HAS BEEN UPDATED




Guys, this update further significantly improves the attacking-build up play so don't miss it








CHANGES :

- tweaked the passing settings of all positions

- tweaked the team passing settings

- tweaked the dribbling settings of MLC/MCR positions



​





mezza147 said:
yer who takes which side
Click to expand...

Hey mate,

It doesn't matter


FrankieKnuckles said:
Overall this tactic is fantastic but I'm confused with the PPM for MCR...which would be a good move to have for that position? Are they similar to MCL?
Click to expand...

Hey mate,

So far I don't see that there's any PPMs for MCR position that deserve to be mentioned as "Recommended Good PPMs"
 
Last edited:
TotalFootballFan9 said:
*******

THE STRIKERLESS TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V7

THE STRIKER TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V8


Guys, this update further significantly improves the attacking-build up play so don't miss it








CHANGES :

- tweaked the passing settings of all positions

- tweaked the team passing settings

- tweaked the dribbling settings of MLC/MCR positions



​
Click to expand...

Jeez...
Updated twice in a day or so :D
Will try this for sure
 
Hi TFF, let's say in DC position I need to choose 3 from 6 player, which all of 6 players have superb moral, match fitness, and conditions, so the difference is in their attributes, which attributes that I need to compare first? Are the highest requirements that you write in OP like Strength 15+,
Positioning 15+, Marking 15+?
so I need to compare that 3 attributes first or how it's going
 
Team Training

Hey TFF

im noticing when setting team training exactly to how you have stated on page one, all my players are unhappy when checking overview and when I get reports.

im getting fantastic results so should I not worry?

Thsbks
 
WOOOOOOOOW !!!!

I'm trying the new version with Southampton and just won vs Man City away 0 – 5 and won vs Liverpool 5 -0 home :)

It looks Diablo like :P


4r4rr44fgggg.png


frfrf66666.png
 
masahirosama_fm said:
Hi TFF, let's say in DC position I need to choose 3 from 6 player, which all of 6 players have superb moral, match fitness, and conditions, so the difference is in their attributes, which attributes that I need to compare first? Are the highest requirements that you write in OP like Strength 15+,
Positioning 15+, Marking 15+?
so I need to compare that 3 attributes first or how it's going
Click to expand...


Hey,

When I compare central defenders I look at their attributes in this order:

1) Acceleration/Pace, it shouldn’t be less than 12 and I find that 12-13 is optimal numbers for these attributes

2) Agility, it shouldn’t be less than 11 and I find that 11-12 are optimal number for this attribute

3) Strength, it shouldn’t be less than 14 and I find that 15-16 are optimal numbers for this attribute

4) Jumping Reach, it shouldn’t be less than 13 and I find that 14-15 are optimal numbers for this attribute

5) Mental Defensive attributes such as Anticipation, Positioning and other

6) Technical Defensive attributes such as Marking and Tackling

7) Technical and Mental Attacking attributes




Naz1983 said:
Hey TFF

im noticing when setting team training exactly to how you have stated on page one, all my players are unhappy when checking overview and when I get reports.

im getting fantastic results so should I not worry?

Thsbks
Click to expand...


Hey,

It's very unlikely that someone of your players might be unhappy about his training schedule if you set as I suggested at the op because it's optimal.

Probably you are messing up something and the reason of his unhappiness isn't his training schedule
 
Last edited:
@TFF

Hey TFF mate, u know that I respect your tactics a lot, all I did in past few FMs was based on tweaking your tactics.


But, this is DEMOLISHER is 3th tactic for FM17, let say that firso one was doing ok, 70% of exploit ME. After that u release V1, V2 V3...than 2nd tactic aslo V1, V2...to V8...now Demoliser already V8.

U are always claim that every new version is 5% do 25% better than previous.

It si simpy impposible, mathematicly! 25 Verison in 3 tactics and claim that every is lets say just 5% better than previous, means that Demolisher v8 is already 200% more effective than Beast V3. Impossible!

I am not criticise you, What I want to say is there is no need to fabricate tactics and versions, u leave concepts and formations to easly, and the newer often are weaker than previous.



[TABLE="class: gt-baf-table"]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]

[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
Training

Hello thanks for the reply

with staff responsibilities what should I change then to, as I'm setting team balanced average and training attack movement but have 36 players unhappy with current training.





Hey,

It's very unlikely that someone of your players might be unhappy about his training schedule if you set as I suggested at the op because it's optimal.

Probably you are messing up something and the reason of his unhappiness isn't his training schedule[/QUOTE]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top