Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

Joined
Aug 1, 2009
Messages
3,388
Reaction score
0
Points
36
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-3P0Mk9FYs"]YouTube - New Elder Scrolls: V Skyrim Trailer - Official VGA 2010[/ame]

Hopefully it won't be as bad as Oblivion, and draws on inspiration from Daggerfall instead!
 
Can't wait, over 100 hours of Oblivion played and a bit less of Morrowind.

Also a new engine.

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim will be powered by a new engine, Bethesda has said. But there are some important points to consider before you get carried away.
"We can now confirm that the TES V: Skyrim engine is all-new. And it looks fantastic," Bethesda community man Nick Breckon tweeted.
"It's a new graphics/gameplay engine built internally. We'll have more details down the road," he added.
What he did not say was, "Skyrim will not use Gamebryo", nor did he specify that, "Skyrim will use id Tech 5."
Simply, this could be Bethesda's way of saying it has heavily modified or revamped the existing Gamebryo Oblivion/Fallout 3 engine. Todd Howard suggested this to be the case when talking to Eurogamer in August.
"Fallout 3 technically does a lot more than Oblivion. The new stuff is an even bigger jump from that," he said. "I can say it is on the existing platforms, which we're really happy with. You almost feel like you have a new console when you see the game."
Fallout: New Vegas was the last of Bethesda's games (developed by Obsidian) to use Gamebyro: "outdated tech", according to Eurogamer's Fallout: New Vegas review.
Less likely, but also tantalisingly possible, is that Bethesda has opted to use new sibling studio id Software's muscular id Tech 5 engine. However, Bethesda's parent company ZeniMax didn't buy id Software until the summer of 2009, and work on a fifth Elder Scrolls game, we presume, started long before then; such a transition would have required scrapping a lot of work before doing, again, a lot of work.
The Elder Scrolls V was unveiled at the weekend, through a trailer with requisite gravelly-toned narration and dramatic prophecy to herald a "Dragon-born" hero. The game will be released on unknown formats - presumably PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 - on 11th November 2011.
Many had considered the next Elder Scrolls game to be an MMO and, although that doesn't immediately appear to be the case, there could be a significant multiplayer part to the game that led speculators down the wrong path.
Now Skyrim has been announced we can expect a flurry of meaty game-reveals to follow.
"One thing I can say is that from when you first hear about it to when it's out will be the shortest it's been for us. It's pretty far along. When we show it, we want to show a lot, because there's a lot of game there to play right now," said Todd Howard earlier this year.

---------- Post added at 09:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:48 PM ----------

Also hopefully it has great modding capabilities like past Elder Scroll games.
 
Hmmm... Not very promising to be fair. Graphics can make a pretty game, but not necessarily a good game.
 
Hmmm... Not very promising to be fair. Graphics can make a pretty game, but not necessarily a good game.

Sure, gameplay is the most important thing but the engine and graphics will hopefully also help to make a better game, the gamebryo engine was getting old aswell and just plain ugly.
 
Oh reet, I loved Oblivion, saw this on youtube today.

Hopefully be harder than Oblivion but not as hard as Morrowind.
 
its released 11.11.11 Thats this time next year :(
 
Sure, gameplay is the most important thing but the engine and graphics will hopefully also help to make a better game, the gamebryo engine was getting old aswell and just plain ugly.

Aye, but they seem to be focusing on that in the interview and not mentioning hours of gameplay, which is what made Morrowind fantastic as it added to the game's depth!

Oh reet, I loved Oblivion, saw this on youtube today.

Hopefully be harder than Oblivion but not as hard as Morrowind.

Morrowind wasn't hard. The gameplay wasn't that good for new characters though.
 
Yeah, why is everyone saying (well not everyone) saying oblivion was bad? I thought it was good. Can't wait for this.
 
Yeah, why is everyone saying (well not everyone) saying oblivion was bad? I thought it was good. Can't wait for this.

Well, it wasn't bad but there were a lot of flaws with the awful leveling system being one of them. (Although changed in a free PC mod).
 
Yeah, why is everyone saying (well not everyone) saying oblivion was bad? I thought it was good. Can't wait for this.

Because we played Morrowind? Morrowind had its flaws, and even though Oblivion corrected many of these (fixing a bunch of flawed skills, somewhat fewer bugs) it was inherently tiny and unimmersive compared to Morrowind.

Edit: And I preferred the darker setting.
 
Because we played Morrowind? Morrowind had its flaws, and even though Oblivion corrected many of these (fixing a bunch of flawed skills, somewhat fewer bugs) it was inherently tiny and unimmersive compared to Morrowind.

Edit: And I preferred the darker setting.
Maybe in comparison to Morrowind it was bad (oh and sorry for not having a good enough computer to play Morrowind) but was it a bad game? No IMO.
 
Well, it wasn't bad but there were a lot of flaws with the awful leveling system being one of them. (Although changed in a free PC mod).
The leveling system was... interesting, but only if you actually knew what it was. It wasn't a leveling system that would reward the player if you played the game in the right way, it rewarded people that knew the loop holes, so yeah in that sense it was bad.
 
Hopefully this has less voice acting than Oblivion. Text is much better imo.

PS. :wub:
 
Hopefully this has less voice acting than Oblivion. Text is much better imo.

PS. :wub:

Heh, the voice acting in Oblivion was truly awful, hundreds of characters but it seemed like there were about 10 voice actors, I don't really mind though.
 
Top