Fabregas value has fallen - Barca

  • Thread starter Thread starter BBC Sport
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 46
  • Views Views 3K
25 -35 Million?

We are talking about Barca, who paid 25 Million for chygrynskiy, 40+ Million and Eto'o for Ibra, 14 Million for Keirrison, 15+ million for Caceres.
 
25 -35 Million?

We are talking about Barca, who paid 25 Million for chygrynskiy, 40+ Million and Eto'o for Ibra, 14 Million for Keirrison, 15+ million for Caceres.

barca dont half overspend XD
 
25 -35 Million?

We are talking about Barca, who paid 25 Million for chygrynskiy, 40+ Million and Eto'o for Ibra, 14 Million for Keirrison, 15+ million for Caceres.

What about 30/35m for David Villa? Cheap deal for a player of his quality.
 
sorry mate but that price is laughable

Well thats your opinion. Im of the belief that its come to the point where Arsenal need to sell Fabregas to build a different way. You can tell he isent 100% focussed on and why would he be when the team he loves keep saying "come here look what you can be a part of". 35mill for Fabregas is about right in my mind.

---------- Post added at 08:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:10 PM ----------

What about 30/35m for David Villa? Cheap deal for a player of his quality.

In his defence Valencia were ****** financialy and had to sell.
 
What about 30/35m for David Villa? Cheap deal for a player of his quality.

Debatable considering his age and why they had to sign Villa in the first place (Getting rid of Eto'o).

And also they could have signed Ozil for 7 Million but they rejected it..

They are brilliant side but **** poor when it comes to transfers..
 
Fabregas' Transfer Fee + £10 million = Modric's Transfer Fee
 
slighty off topic but imagine modric and fabregas in the same midfeild :O
 
Total non story.. Barcelona trying to drive the price now, that is it.
 
Meh. Cesc's comments yesterday put them in the driving seat - pay up, or shut up.
 
slighty off topic but imagine modric and fabregas in the same midfeild :O
wouldnt work for the simple reason that both hold the same position.. they are both playmakers. I mean, on of them should be sent to play right or left, which automatically makes him useless on the pitch.
 
wouldnt work for the simple reason that both hold the same position.. they are both playmakers. I mean, on of them should be sent to play right or left, which automatically makes him useless on the pitch.

Not necessarily. A 4-2-3-1, Modric playing deep in the double pivot, Fab the second striker. Chuck in someone like David Pizarro as a destroyer and the passing range is just... no. Way too good.

Hey and actually if you put Iniesta on the LW...
 
Not necessarily. A 4-2-3-1, Modric playing deep in the double pivot, Fab the second striker. Chuck in someone like David Pizarro as a destroyer and the passing range is just... no. Way too good.

Hey and actually if you put Iniesta on the LW...

Quite clearly you need Carrick next to modric, with Gibson roaming on the left.
 
Not necessarily. A 4-2-3-1, Modric playing deep in the double pivot, Fab the second striker. Chuck in someone like David Pizarro as a destroyer and the passing range is just... no. Way too good.

Hey and actually if you put Iniesta on the LW...


Iniesta plays on the left, yes. but thats Iniesta. Have you EVER seen either Modric or Cesc playing on the LW/RW?? No sense at all brother;] BTW 4-2-3-1 might work, indeed but.. its too defending style.. wouldnt work, im tellin ya;]
 
Not necessarily. A 4-2-3-1, Modric playing deep in the double pivot, Fab the second striker. Chuck in someone like David Pizarro as a destroyer and the passing range is just... no. Way too good.

Hey and actually if you put Iniesta on the LW...

and the forward??? :D
 
Back
Top