FIGHTER !

MartinV1989 said:
Dude ur new overload tactic is going with standart is that right?
Click to expand...

Yes... It's got Standrad mentality. "Overload" is just a name and nothing more and I named it like that just to indicate that when you use this tactic you put extreme pressure on your opposition in cost of the stability in the defense and to achieve such pressure it isn't necessary to use Overload mentality. ;)
 
Last edited:
TTF, I like tactics based on 4-3-3 or 4123.This one of your 442's been great to me. One of the most stable of this FM 17. But how could I try to adapt this to a 433 (4123)? Without losing the quality of this 442, of course.
 
SPFC said:
TTF, I like tactics based on 4-3-3 or 4123.This one of your 442's been great to me. One of the most stable of this FM 17. But how could I try to adapt this to a 433 (4123)? Without losing the quality of this 442, of course.
Click to expand...

in his other thread there's a 4-1-2-3 that works perfect too lol (wardlord thread, new vortex tactic)
 
TotalFootballFan9 said:
I'd recommend this:

MCL : Left Foot – Very Strong/Strong/Fairly Strong
MCR : Right Foot – Very Strong/Strong/Fairly Strong
STCL : Left Foot – Very Strong/Strong/Fairly Strong
STCR : Right Foot – Very Strong/Strong/Fairly Strong
Click to expand...

what about DL and DR? could we use modern inverted WB-s as DL ? like darmian de sciglio santon azpilicueta ? or 20 rating on left foot would perform better?
 
SPFC said:
no.
that 4-1-2-2-1, i like without wingers, 433 pure
Click to expand...

Hey mate,

If you look at the attacking build-up play and the defensive play of this tactic then you'll see that it isn't possible to make something like that with 3 striker formation.


tesseraeikosi7 said:
what about DL and DR? could we use modern inverted WB-s as DL ? like darmian de sciglio santon azpilicueta ? or 20 rating on left foot would perform better?
Click to expand...

Hey,

The tactic works the best if DL's got 20 rating for the left foot and DR's got 20 rating for the right foot.
 
"INSIDE FORWARDS" VERSION OF TACTIC HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE OP

WARLORD THREAD HAS BEEN CLOSED





The only difference of this version from the original tactic is ML/MR positions were moved to AML/AMR and their roles were changed from Wide Midfielders to Inside Forwards and PIs were tweaked too.

Right now it's hard for me to tell which tactic is better because both tactics show very similar results but this version has one obvious advantage over the original version, it’s much easier to find players for AML/AMR positions than ML/MR positions.


Guys, I've closed WARLORD thread because with Inside Forwards version of this tactic there's no point in having VORTEX tactic anymore.


Fighter_IFs_Formation.png


​
 
stash84 said:
check the OP, it says AML/AMR/MCL should take the corners
Click to expand...

ok thx. he changed it. it wasn't there when I asked. it was only for first tac that is why I asked and presumed.

but anyway thx that is what I was trying to find.
 
With Man United which CDs would you go for? Rojo - Smalling? or Bailly - Smalling?

And as AFs would you go with Martial - Rashford or Martial - Zlatan?
 
Using Sparta in Holland. The IF version is terrbile for my defence, the opposition are just waaaay too open on the wings.
I replayed the match, using the WM version which is not fluid, and I won the match 2-0
 
Last edited:
IMO, fighter V1 is much much better than the IF one in my different saves.
Have a nice christmas eve guys ! :)
 
4-2-4 Inside Forwards was not a good Christmas Present unfortunately. :(
 
taringakos said:
Yep.Unfortunately.Not.Working.For.Me.Neither.
Click to expand...

Havent tried the inside forward one yet but Vortex was a lot better than Fighter for me, currently in January 1st season with Spurs no transfers and unbeaten in the league with 51 points after 19 games!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top