ofcourse i would't mind it but still to win with more goals with be better
heh mate, i never care how much my goals my team will score, i am happy to win 1-0 , yeah i do win with high score but to me its the same. for exmple i won everton at home 2-1, and i had 8 ccc.
 
Heh... Mate, the D-Line and closing down changes that I made in V6 improved the defense about 10 times without any significant impact for the attack.

Right now with the D-Line and Closing Down changes V6 shows such incredible performance that I haven't never seen in FM16 yet so I'd say that V6 is my last tactic for FM16. :)

With V6 I'm getting close to 100% positive results on my testing points which are configured to be extremely challenging, to compare I can say that with V5 I was getting only 60% positive results on these testing points so there were huge area to improve the tactic further but now when I'm getting 100% result there's simple nothing left to improve anymore. :)

The D-Line and Closing Down changes added some insane boost to the tactic's performance... LOL :) When I saw it I didn't believe my own eyes so I retested few extra times compare to my regular testing rutine. :)


Thank you for all your great tactics, mate!

I hope to see you around in FM17!
 
heh mate, i never care how much my goals my team will score, i am happy to win 1-0 , yeah i do win with high score but to me its the same. for exmple i won everton at home 2-1, and i had 8 ccc.

well i do haha i want a brilliant player that scores alot only had 1 tactic that worked with it but lost so many away games
 
HOLY COW!!! AAAAAAAAAA!!!! :)

MY FIRST GAME WITH V6!! I'M NEWCASTLE THE 2ND SEASON!

MY TEAM HAD 17 SCORING CHANCES AND MY OPPOSITION HAD 0 SCORING CHANCES! :O

THAT'S INSANE!! :)

12wqqqww13132.png



21 corners!!!! Jesus ******* christ. That means you created little from open play and never carved much open, constantly set pieces as defenders are able to clear easily. Fair play to the creator if overall this still gets results, but it's no wonder that it's always the same guys who end up posting ridiculous match stats in the frustration threads..
 
Last edited:
Great tactic! West Ham are heading for the big time! Unbeaten so far. Just knocked out Man.Utd of the League Cup. 1-0 down and a Hammers player sent off because of complaining. My new striker Finnbogason came on after 62 mins and scored two great goals. Impressive! This is the Man.Utd of today with Mourinho, Zlatan, Henrikh and even Pogba they have. No instant result.

I have used editor for all the transfers in the big leagues and also updated team status(promotion/relegation) and manager status. Allardyce for England. Moyes did not get Sunderland Im afraid. I gave that job to my hero Kenny Daglish with Steven G. as his assistant(player-***) :)

View attachment 135320View attachment 135319
 
Last edited:
21 corners!!!! Jesus ******* christ. That means you created little from open play and never carved much open, constantly set pieces as defenders are able to clear easily. Fair play to the creator if overall this still gets results, but it's no wonder that it's always the same guys who end up posting ridiculous match stats in the frustration threads..

create a good tactic and post it or shut up

always the same type of people who come in and try to derail one of the best tactic creators threads
 
Dude, you are saying total rubbish

Here's a PKM of the match... download it then play the match and see how the scoring chances were created in that match

Next time don't say rubbish and don't make false accusations

Should I add MORON??!


If that's your style, you may. ;-) Thanks for the up, this is really creative, it actually has a holding mid too. Just no coincidence that all the matchs stats posted where nothing is converted in the frustration threads look absolutely the samey in tendency and it's players downloading who never learn to play and still have the guts to argue how they'd been rigged. The set pieces here come from the fact that defenders are actually pulled all over, rather than them able to clear easily as they aren't stretched an inch. What's fascinating is how the wide guys in particular have all the space in the world which causes ramifications in the centre too once the ball is played out wide (creative asymmetric midfield, which seems to cause the LM of the op to tuck inside, and leave that space out wide for the WBR), but then that's the area that's currently monitored by SI the most.

TotalFootballFan, ever considered teaming up with SI to stress test if their ME still has any faults to it? No wonder FM Live was such a failure, and that had tons of it and everybody was afraid of getting cheated up to the point where player quality or anything meant little as guys always into space are guys always into space no matter what team talks, attributes, morale, etc. :-) From playing it seems as that this may be some less effective if a defense is packed in the middle, such as the Defensive 4-2-3-1 two DM (DM DM LM MC MR FWD) so online you may be able to find a solution against it, which is important for versus competitions. But naturally any AI goes by the formations it has edited into the db and some are rare whilst others are common place (the many 4-4-1-1 in the Bundesliga etc, three centre defenses and narrow formations more common in Serie A). That AI would crack is a myth naturally, it doesn't even register if its overloaded with any normal formation actually in the db (4-2-3-1 narrow packing the centre, not an exploit as such mind), but for a moment imagine if it would just copy 100% what you would use, scary thought. :D
 
Last edited:
hey tff, mate, i f cant teach my amc for exmple to dictates teampo, what do i need to unlearn him?
 

Mate, here's my advice to you... if you want to compare your scoring chances Vs your opposition scoring chances then you shouldn't look only at "Clear Cut Chances" but you should also look at "Half Chances" because the game works the way that very often it counts some harmless scoring chances as "Clear Cut Chances" and the same time it counts some almost 100% scoring chances as only "Half Chances".

So looking only at "Clear Cut Chances" is very misleading and you should always look at combination "Clear Cut Chances + Half Chances = Scoring Chances" because only this combination gives you accurate picture about how manny scoring chances teams had in the match.

The game tries to distinct "Half Chances" and "Clear Cut Chances" and to determine which of them are "more deadly" but its ability to do that is very limited and very often it makes mistakes and as I already said it marks some harmless scoring chances as "Clear Cut Chances" and some really 100% scoring chances as only "Half Chances".
 
Last edited:
yes mate i did checked, and he dosent have it, we are talking about ozil

Ahh... I see what's the problem... this PPM is only available for players that have "Natural" rating for MC position.

I'll update the OP and remove "Dictates Tempo" from AMC position.
 
Back
Top