Man Utd suffer Van der Sar blow

  • Thread starter Thread starter BBC Sport
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 49
  • Views Views 3K
what arsenals mid is better then chelsea lol

mikel,essien,lampard,ballack,malouda,zhirkov,joe cole,deco lol

did you see statistics last season? only one thats good is lampard thats all.

if arsenal had arshavin from start of season arshavin would of killed lampard..read the link i gave you...

arshavin, fabregas, nasri, diaby, denilson, song, walcott, rosicky, eboue,

pretty as good as chelsea's
 
Last edited:
I think arsenal have a better forwards than man united.... fair enought they have rooney, berba owen....
but i think rooney plays better out wide.... so just berba and sick note owen...
wen we have van persie... (great left foot)
vela.... walcott... eduardo... arshavin... bendtner.....


i understand theres better players than them, but when you have 6 players who are all capable of scoring plenty of goals then you stand a chance of winning any league or cup!

---------- Post added at 03:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:44 PM ----------

did you see statistics last season? only one thats good is lampard thats all.

if arsenal had arshavin from start of season arshavin would of killed lampard..read the link i gave you...

arshavin, fabregas, nasri, diaby, denilson, song, walcott, rosicky, eboue,

pretty as good as chelsea's


you forgot van persie.. he can play on left
 
did you see statistics last season? only one thats good is lampard thats all.

if arsenal had arshavin from start of season arshavin would of killed lampard..read the link i gave you...

arshavin, fabregas, nasri, diaby, denilson, song, walcott, rosicky, eboue,

pretty as good as chelsea's

Your probly right about your midfield being better last year.
Mikel was solid, nothing special
Ballack is a joke, should be sold immeidately
Malouda only started playing well in the last month of the season
Essien was injured for 3/4's of the season
Joe Cole was injured for all of it

So of course statistic wise your midfield would be better if we only have Lamps playing on a regular basis
 
Your probly right about your midfield being better last year.
Mikel was solid, nothing special
Ballack is a joke, should be sold immeidately
Malouda only started playing well in the last month of the season
Essien was injured for 3/4's of the season
Joe Cole was injured for all of it

So of course statistic wise your midfield would be better if we only have Lamps playing on a regular basis

Thank you

I dont want to cause an aguement but im sick and tired of people saying arsenal are useless and dont stand a chance..

denilson statistics wise was probs the best dm last season or joint first with masharano..so thank you very much arsenal DO not need a dm..we need a defender thats all..
 
Last edited:
How can you say that denilson+diaby are better than mikel/essien
lampard was better than fabregas last season
arshavin was the only arsenal midfielder who did really well
 
no becuase chelsea rarely had a full team so obviously denilson will have better stats cus he played more

you really aint got a clue?

mikel played nearly the same as densilson...

like i said lampard killed it last season but like i said 'if' arshavin played the whole season arshavin clearly would of won..
 
Mascherano only played 21 premiership matches compared to denilson's 37 so half the stats are meaningless
Tackles per game: Mascherano much higher than denilson
Interceptions per game: Denilson had a higher average so i'll allow u there :P
 
How can you say that denilson+diaby are better than mikel/essien
lampard was better than fabregas last season
arshavin was the only arsenal midfielder who did really well

erm no Nasri was very gd and Walcott was gd so unlucky mate Arshavin was not are only gd midflider last season. Plus you saw Denilson stats he was gd he is gd but for me he isnt a DM.

I think we still need a DM.
 
Back
Top