Manchester United owner's debts hit £1.1bn

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike.
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 73
  • Views Views 5K

Mike.

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
31,888
Reaction score
31
Points
48
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/10237268.stm

Manchester United owner's debts hit £1.1bn

Page last updated at 2:07 GMT, Monday, 7 June 2010 3:07 UK



By John Sweeney and Andrew Head BBC Panorama
_48000810_sweeney_poster466.jpg
John Sweeney followed the debt trail of the Glazer family
Manchester United's owners are £1.1bn in debt - £400m more than previously known - after borrowing extensively against their shopping mall business.
BBC Panorama has found evidence that the Glazer family's debt levels may threaten their hold on the club.
A spokesman for the American family has said it holds more than £2bn in assets.



But the extent of the debt owed by the Glazers is likely to fuel a continuing revolt by some supporters, who oppose their ownership of the club.
Green and gold Details of the financial arrangements of the owners also come at a time when the sport's governing bodies are facing questions about Premier League debts that have reached a combined total of £3.4bn and the growing popularity of leveraged buyouts in English clubs.
Continue reading the main story
These are people who tell us not to worry about Manchester United debt because they are great businessmen. In their core business in the US they got it absolutely wrong
Andy Green City Analyst and Man U supporter
Mortgage documents seen by the BBC show that the Glazers have borrowed £388m ($570m) against shopping malls and £66m ($95m) against their American National Football League team, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
In addition to their mortgages in the US, a portion of the Glazer family's £700m Manchester United debt will soon see them charged interest at a rate of 16.25%.



Fans fear that, despite the club's record of success on the pitch, the Glazers' leveraged buy-out of United has saddled the club with debt and that may mean that there is no spare money in the future to buy a new generation of star players.
Disappointed fans have launched the "green and gold" campaign that resurrects the original team colours in protest over the Glazers' ownership.
Their numbers have reached 158,000 and former United star David Beckham has signalled his support.



They point to the £80m sale of star striker Cristiano Ronaldo last year and note that he has not been replaced by a player of similar quality. Yet ticket prices have gone up by more than a third.
The club's management denies any lack of commitment to buying new talent and says that cash is available for Sir Alex Ferguson to buy players.
A spokesman for the Glazers confirmed that the family does have debts of at least a £1bn, but added they have assets worth more than double that.

Negative equity
City analyst Andy Green, 37, is the disgruntled Manchester United supporter who first uncovered the extent of the Glazers' debts. Mr Green said: "They borrowed more money at inflated valuations right at the top of the cycle.
"These are people who tell us not to worry about Manchester United debt because they are great businessmen. In their core business in the US they got it absolutely wrong."
_48000885__47944720_manchesterunited-1.jpg
The Glazers have defended their ownership of the team
The debt levels at the club are also drawing the attention of other prominent football figures.
Dave Whelan, Chairman of Wigan Athletic, told Panorama: "I don't think anybody can be satisfied with how Manchester United are being run... they have got somewhere in the order of three-quarters of a billion pounds worth of debt. That has got to be eliminated and eliminated quickly."
The Glazer family's main assets are the shopping centre business in America, First Allied Corporation, along with Manchester United and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.



First Allied is a private business and its accounts are not publicly available. But Mr Green discovered that the Glazers' shopping mall mortgages had been bundled with other loans as Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities.
Those bundles are publicly traded and therefore require the Glazers to provide detailed information on all the mortgages, which are then publicly available in the US.
Mr Green found mortgages - confirmed by the BBC - on 63 of 64 First Allied shopping centres, totalling £388m ($570m).
Most of those were taken out with Lehman Brothers before the US investment banking giant went bankrupt, triggering the global banking crisis in 2008.

'Watch list'
While Lehmans collapsed, the Glazers' mortgage debt lived on and many of those shopping centres are not generating enough income to keep up with interest payments.
With falling commercial property values, many are also now in negative equity.
Banks have put 28 of the shopping centres on a watch list, meaning they are worried about the loans.
Four shopping centres - one each in Ohio, New Mexico, Texas and Georgia - have already gone bankrupt.


When they bought Manchester United in 2005, the Glazer family borrowed £500m and paid the remaining £272 million in cash.
Mr Green found that the Glazers had remortgaged 25 of their shopping centres in the six months before the takeover.
He believes the family borrowed against their US properties to pay for United: "At the time when they had to present a huge amount of cash over here in the UK they borrowed a huge amount of extra money in the US and publicly they didn't buy anything else that year."


A spokesman for the family did not respond to questions about the mortgages taken out by First Allied.
But with properties now worth £378m ($555m) but mortgages valued at £388m ($570m), the shopping mall company now appears to be worth next to nothing.
'Commercial expertise' That financial picture has analyst Mr Green questioning how the Glazers will service their £1.1bn debt.
_48007150__47422523_008875634-1-1.jpg
Fans are wearing green and gold in protest over the Glazers' ownership
United chief executive, David Gill, has said: "We're very confident the business model we have in place will ensure the club can continue to compete at the top of football for many years to come.
"The owners have been true to their word since they took over the club in 2005. They've brought commercial expertise and commercial benefit to us in a numbers of areas, and we've seen our revenues grow significantly."
The Glazers' most troublesome debts are held by Red Football, the parent company that owns Manchester United.


They are payment in kind loans, or PIKs, worth £200m and the interest owing on them will soon rise to 16.25%.
Mr Gill told the BBC in January: "We don't worry about the PIK repayment. That's nothing to with the club."
A spokesman for Manchester United told the BBC last week that the club stands behind Mr Gill's assertion that the debts will be repaid without involving the club.


But sources close to the Glazers have confirmed that Red Football will use cash from Manchester United to pay off the PIKs in the future. The Glazers are said to be "comfortable" with the PIKs.
The situation at Manchester United reflects the wider issue within the Premier League, where clubs like Liverpool and West Ham are struggling with huge debts and FA Cup finalists Portsmouth barely staved off bankruptcy.
Both the Premier League and the FA declined requests for interviews on the subject of debt in football.


I knew they were in trouble, didnt know it was this bad, words fail me on how people in this kind of dire straits can buy a football club, anyone who wants to know more, watch Panorama: Man United - Into the Red, BBC One, Tuesday, 8 June at 2235BST
 
Administration I think ? Happens to good old Pompey / Palace but not Man United ? :S
 
Administration I think ? Happens to good old Pompey / Palace but not Man United ? :S

the debts are a result of borrowing against the Glazer family's assets not United's so i think you'd have a hard case arguing for Utd to undergo administration (H)

it's still not a good trend though. 'em Glazers need to **** off
 
the debts are a result of borrowing against the Glazer family's assets not United's so i think you'd have a hard case arguing for Utd to undergo administration (H)

it's still not a good trend though. 'em Glazers need to **** off

Ahh my bad then :'(
 
F*****g Americans!! Wish theyd **** off back across the Atlantic. LUHG
 
Glazers are ruining Man United and if they dont soon sell it will be tough for the Red Devils to compete with the likes of Cheslea and Man City in the transfer market although u wont see me complaining:D
 
If the Glazers cant see how unpopular they are then sooner or later they will. Which then hopefully they will be forced to sell Manchester United to help pay off their own debts.
 
I wish I could rack up that much debt..
 
And they wonder why there is a financial crisis when twats are borrowing £1000,000,000 just for a ******* football club! :S
 
Administration I think ? Happens to good old Pompey / Palace but not Man United ? :S

but the big difference is man u make a £80,000,000 PROFIT each year one of only a very small amount of clubs to make a PROFIT

---------- Post added at 11:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:30 PM ----------

the trouble was the glazers couldn't afford to buy man u and so may potencial new owners
 
I just posted this on the BBC duplicate thread but...

The debt that the club owes is bad, and will reduce the club's ability to use its financial muscle for transfers etc for several years. What's important about the debt that the Glazers owe separately to the club isn't that it is owed by United, but that United is the most-liquid asset the Glazers have - it's the only thing they own where they can raise cash quickly (by selling players) should they need to.

So while it's not a problem at the moment, it could be a problem should things get worse with the Glazers other companies. Also because it's the only cash-cow in the Glazer empire, it's the last asset they'll sell unless they can make enough on it to clear the rest of their debts and make a profit. So bad news in the other businesses won't force a sale.
 
but the big difference is man u make a £80,000,000 PROFIT each year one of only a very small amount of clubs to make a PROFIT

---------- Post added at 11:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:30 PM ----------

the trouble was the glazers couldn't afford to buy man u and so may potencial new owners
Since when have United made an £80m profit each year? They sold Ronaldo for £80m this season and didn't make anywhere near that profit I heard?
 
There is nothing to worry about as far as Manchester United fans are concerned, if it gets to the stage when they can't afford to run the football club anymore then they will have no choice but to sell because they have a legal obligation to pay back that debt. Manchester United are not going to go bust, there will be lots of buyers if Manchester United are put on the market.
 
There is nothing to worry about as far as Manchester United fans are concerned, if it gets to the stage when they can't afford to run the football club anymore then they will have no choice but to sell because they have a legal obligation to pay back that debt. Manchester United are not going to go bust, there will be lots of buyers if Manchester United are put on the market.

They're legal obligation will mean that Manchester United will be liquitated if they can't repay the debt so there is quite alot to be worried about. Look at Portsmouth atm, that could well be Man Utd in 5 years.
 
There is nothing to worry about as far as Manchester United fans are concerned, if it gets to the stage when they can't afford to run the football club anymore then they will have no choice but to sell because they have a legal obligation to pay back that debt. Manchester United are not going to go bust, there will be lots of buyers if Manchester United are put on the market.

Did you just read what I just wrote?
 
Since when have United made an £80m profit each year? They sold Ronaldo for £80m this season and didn't make anywhere near that profit I heard?
lol exaclty, we made 40+ million with the ronaldo sale. we certainly wouldnt have made a profit without it. make no mistake this is a major problem for united, not now, but in the near future.

---------- Post added at 11:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:45 PM ----------

I just posted this on the BBC duplicate thread but...

The debt that the club owes is bad, and will reduce the club's ability to use its financial muscle for transfers etc for several years. What's important about the debt that the Glazers owe separately to the club isn't that it is owed by United, but that United is the most-liquid asset the Glazers have - it's the only thing they own where they can raise cash quickly (by selling players) should they need to.

So while it's not a problem at the moment, it could be a problem should things get worse with the Glazers other companies. Also because it's the only cash-cow in the Glazer empire, it's the last asset they'll sell unless they can make enough on it to clear the rest of their debts and make a profit. So bad news in the other businesses won't force a sale.
this.
 
They're legal obligation will mean that Manchester United will be liquitated if they can't repay the debt so there is quite alot to be worried about. Look at Portsmouth atm, that could well be Man Utd in 5 years.


Manchester United won't be liquidated because there won't be any need for it to be liquidated, there will be lots of buyers if Manchester United is put on the market so it would not be in anyone's interests for the club to be liquidated. Manchester United will never end up like Portsmouth because the club is far too big and generates far too much money for that to ever happen. Rival fans would love for it to happen but its not going to ever happen.
 
Back
Top