Really trying hard to re-create the Martin O'Neill tactic in my Wolves game and at least in my opinion, mainly because I see similarities in the squads and personalities (Young, hard working british players, Tough tackling midfielders, Jarvis, Hunt and Kightly providing the pace and width down the wings, Doyle with his aerial threat, Ebanks-Blake being able to get in behind) - granted of lesser quality though. I decided to go this way because I was basically setting my stall out and through watching the side play I saw the similarities of the way Villa lined up during 06-10 and being an admirer of O'Neill I decided I wanted to go this way of playing. I’m not one to go fluid with lots of creative freedom anyhow; I prefer the more direct, quick football.
Now I have set up team instructions and player instructions, but with the default settings the TC gives so if someone could expand on my ideas I would be much appreciated - who knows, we may even go on to create a killer of a tactic. So far, I have this.
(Apologises because of not being able to provide screenshots, bit of a numpty when it comes to Computers)
Philosophy - Very Rigid
Starting Strategy - Attacking (Home Games) Counter (Away Games)
Passing Style - More Direct
Creative Freedom - More Disciplined
Closing down - Stand-Off More
Tackling - More Aggressive
Marking - Man Marking
Crossing - Float Crosses
Roaming - Stick To Position
Focus Passing - Down Both Flanks
GK: Goalkeeper (Defend)
RB: Full Back (Defend)
CB: Limited Defender (Defend)
CB: Limited Defender (Defend)
LB: Full Back (Defend)
DMR: Defensive Midfielder (Support)
DML: Defensive Midfielder (Support)
AMR: Winger (Attack)
AML: Winger (Attack)
SCR: Target Man (Support)
SCL: Poacher (Attack)
(No advanced settings tweaked on these positions I again add)
The idea I have (IMO O'Neill's way of playing, although stand corrected) is to have a flat back four with the full backs providing very little advancing, although at home with the attacking strategy coming forward abit, the two defensive midfielders acting as a barrier in front of that but with support they will bring the ball forward. With direct passing this 'back six' will get the ball forward quickly to the advanced wingers, who will provide the flair and width (I am toying with the idea of giving these more license to roam, again more help/advice needed here.) and quickly getting balls into the box for the forwards and possibly even the in rushing DMCs. The target man will also act as a quick way of breaking with balls being played at him.
I can’t stress enough that this is my first real go at making a tactic I plan to stick at long-term, as i have always been a game by game tweaker, but with very boring and mainly default settings. I am also fed up of using the 'super tactics' on here too which yes do bring you results, but in reality they are tactics which are just exploiting bugs in the ME. I would love it to be a plug and play (in some respects anyway, I feel strategy simply has to be tweaked now and again no matter who you are/what tactic being used) and if some of my ideas or opinions of how O'Neill gets his sides to line up is wrong, don’t be too critical.
I am mainly looking on people to come up with advanced settings for the players, I definatly feel these need tweaked and also the positions itself? Is the 4-2-2-2 the wrong way to line up? Should it be a solid 4-4-2? I feel the team instructions are fairly accurate, but feel free to discuss those too.
Now I have set up team instructions and player instructions, but with the default settings the TC gives so if someone could expand on my ideas I would be much appreciated - who knows, we may even go on to create a killer of a tactic. So far, I have this.
(Apologises because of not being able to provide screenshots, bit of a numpty when it comes to Computers)
Philosophy - Very Rigid
Starting Strategy - Attacking (Home Games) Counter (Away Games)
Passing Style - More Direct
Creative Freedom - More Disciplined
Closing down - Stand-Off More
Tackling - More Aggressive
Marking - Man Marking
Crossing - Float Crosses
Roaming - Stick To Position
Focus Passing - Down Both Flanks
GK: Goalkeeper (Defend)
RB: Full Back (Defend)
CB: Limited Defender (Defend)
CB: Limited Defender (Defend)
LB: Full Back (Defend)
DMR: Defensive Midfielder (Support)
DML: Defensive Midfielder (Support)
AMR: Winger (Attack)
AML: Winger (Attack)
SCR: Target Man (Support)
SCL: Poacher (Attack)
(No advanced settings tweaked on these positions I again add)
The idea I have (IMO O'Neill's way of playing, although stand corrected) is to have a flat back four with the full backs providing very little advancing, although at home with the attacking strategy coming forward abit, the two defensive midfielders acting as a barrier in front of that but with support they will bring the ball forward. With direct passing this 'back six' will get the ball forward quickly to the advanced wingers, who will provide the flair and width (I am toying with the idea of giving these more license to roam, again more help/advice needed here.) and quickly getting balls into the box for the forwards and possibly even the in rushing DMCs. The target man will also act as a quick way of breaking with balls being played at him.
I can’t stress enough that this is my first real go at making a tactic I plan to stick at long-term, as i have always been a game by game tweaker, but with very boring and mainly default settings. I am also fed up of using the 'super tactics' on here too which yes do bring you results, but in reality they are tactics which are just exploiting bugs in the ME. I would love it to be a plug and play (in some respects anyway, I feel strategy simply has to be tweaked now and again no matter who you are/what tactic being used) and if some of my ideas or opinions of how O'Neill gets his sides to line up is wrong, don’t be too critical.
I am mainly looking on people to come up with advanced settings for the players, I definatly feel these need tweaked and also the positions itself? Is the 4-2-2-2 the wrong way to line up? Should it be a solid 4-4-2? I feel the team instructions are fairly accurate, but feel free to discuss those too.