They know nothing else, locked straight up after offending, most likely just commit crime behind bars, assaults, drug dealing, trafficking, then let back on to the streets and a relatively young age after 15 - 20 years or so behind bars.
They know nothing else, locked straight up after offending, most likely just commit crime behind bars, assaults, drug dealing, trafficking, then let back on to the streets and a relatively young age after 15 - 20 years or so behind bars.
hmm, the same police that i rang up because there is a gang leader lives next door to me, in the disabled bungalow my mum should have as she can barely walk, but hes fraudulently claiming benefits saying hes in a wheelchair so he got the house and we didnt. he drives bmw's, merc's, MG sports cars, etc, has loads of money from his criminal activities. i told the police all this, and got "oh yeah, we know, just dont talk to them or have anything to do with them. we cant do anything about them as they always turn it round and make out they are the victim." two and a half years ive lived here, dealing with this every single day, and nothing is done, as the police dont want the hassle of trying to bust him, they would rather just take thier paychecks home than try and help the people who are worst off. ive even heard he has a couple of them on his payroll. this is just one thing in a long long line of things thats happened to me. and you wonder why i think they are just corrupt money grabbing *******. you try being in my situation, you might feel like me then.
You complain that he makes a blanket statement, and then you claim that murderers won't kill again? Not sure how that works.
I know it's the Daily Mail but I think it offers fairly conclusive proof that a high percentage of murderers re-offend.
Edit - I agree with the rest of your points, this is the only one I'm not sure about. Didn't want this to look like I'm entirely against everything you say!
There's obviously a lot more happening that is restricting them, they can't divulge classified information to you over the phone, they could be listening in next door. It won't be that they don't want to deal with him, it will be that they physically can't because of rules they have in place, which is a prime example of this topic! They don't have sufficient evidence to bust him. A phone call from a local resident isn't anywhere near enough. How do you know that they aren't looking in to it right now? There could be a massive plan to shut him down.
they have, and at least one guy died because of it, and the cop got off scott free. makes me sick. cops are the kids who got bullied in school and have never had a sense of power, so this is how they make up for it. and 'anarchists'? if the world/government/police wasnt so **** to people, they wouldnt feel the need to do these things would they? its not these people you should be blaming, its the people at the top ruining it for everyone else while they take home a huge amount of money without a care for anyone else.
the police dont care about us, they care about thier own sense of power and self worth you might think they have done something to help you, but it will just be for a pat on the back, a sense of more power, a promotion and to line thier own pockets but hey, thats just my facts, im not ******** with you about it, you beleive whatever you want
I understand you have made other points and some fair views on the reasons as to why you believe certain things about the police force, Your view on saying police are kids who got bullied thats total BS, At one point in my life I wanted to be a policeman simply because I wanted to become a member of S.W.A.T. I was never bullied at school. Other people in the force may have had someone murdered or raped or anything in the family that made them want to do things for the better. Granted some people may have been bullied and just want to feel the 'big man' so to speak. It's ok to sit here and criticize police but really police are not the problem.
Do you think the guy came up with that loop hole on his own ? the real person/people to blame are lawyers, Police work tirelessly to get these people banged up and lawyers sit on there **** finding some technical term to get them off scot free and earn a massive wage at the end of it all. They are the real problem and of course it's their jobs and I don't blame them for what they do because they have spent many years studying for a degree but they fight to keep rapists and murderers out of prison and into the community. Thats where the problem lies! Would also blame the prison service as nowadays prison is a place they love being some of them live better than good working citizens who burst there **** off 40 hours a week on NMW and scrape by. Most prisons now have sky playstations etc. They should be made to work on the roads like it used to be etc. Once you have commited a murder or rape - Human rights should be banished because you don't deserve any rights if thats the kind of thing you do because simply you are not Human then your an animal.
That's just my opinion on the matter. The emergency Services put their lives on the line every day working tirelessly same as the Army and definately don't get the wages that they should.
There's obviously a lot more happening that is restricting them, they can't divulge classified information to you over the phone, they could be listening in next door. It won't be that they don't want to deal with him, it will be that they physically can't because of rules they have in place, which is a prime example of this topic! They don't have sufficient evidence to bust him. A phone call from a local resident isn't anywhere near enough. How do you know that they aren't looking in to it right now? There could be a massive plan to shut him down.
The police were totally right, they used methods available to catch a criminal, if thats deemed wrong then there is something fundamentally wrong with society.
PS. To anyone who thinks of replying with 'the police can't allowed to go round bugging people, how would you like it if they bugged you'. I would reply 'I couldn't care less as I don't commit crimes, they can bug me all they want'.
PPS. To anyone who thinks of replying to the PS. with 'well its just the principle of it'. I would reply 'I don't see why we should risk peoples safety just to satisfy some idiots principles/ego, it kind of sounds like you're just making excuses what do you have to hide'.
Rant over, much better ...... this is what happens when I get stressed by FM lol
Excellent post, especially the first PS. Really sums up my feelings regarding it. I always wondered why people objected to security cameras, for example: if you've got nothing to hide, it's not going to harm you.
yeah it does say a lot about thier future, how bleak it is looking that they feel they have to do these things to try and make a difference, because no one at the top cares well, the people who have died, and the big amount of people that have been injured or had thier lives permanently changed due to police brutality, thats destroying lives. the people the government have screwed over, losing jobs, losing houses, having thier lives torn apart. back to the police, they dont care, they get the feeling of being a 'big man' for hitting a little guy very hard with a baton, and get paid a handsome wage for doing so. if you do some research, you'll see police brutality is far more prevalent in society than it should be and needs to be
Off course the Police where wrong, they are not above the Law. They where specifically told they cant bug his car. They went on and did as they please.
If someone applies for a gun license and are refused it. They go on and buy a gun anyway. Should they be prosecuted? Off course they should, they broke the Law.
I dont think the criminal should be released just the people involved in the operation fired.
Some cops are ****** that join to get a sense of power and be above the Law.
Although some are there to help out and stop crime following the correct procedures.
However I think the ones that join to make a difference are in the minority.
I wanted to be a garda but due to the amount of power possessive ****** involved in it I changed my mind.
The farmer wanted a gun to kill the foxes that where killing his chickens, or catch them at least. But his license was turned down can he take the law into his own hands for the greater good?How can you compare a gun license and the police. They broke the law for the greater good. What kind of society do we live in where we criticise the police for breaking a law so they can catch a murderer and major drug dealer. It's as bad as the people who get arrested for assault for beating someone off their property. It's madness.
The farmer wanted a gun to kill the foxes that where killing his chickens, or catch them at least. But his license was turned down can he take the law into his own hands for the greater good?
Like I said they arent above the law.
A fox and a drug dealer are completly differrent.A farmer and police officer are COMPLETELY different.
A fox and a drug dealer are completly differrent.
So are you saying it is fine for a Police Officer to break the law but not a farmer?