hitman1531
Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2009
- Messages
- 27
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Got my Nottingham Forest team relegated. Think it only works for the big teams.
Got my Nottingham Forest team relegated. Think it only works for the big teams.
Got my Nottingham Forest team relegated. Think it only works for the big teams.
It seems this doesn't work with smaller teams, i.e. teams with lower quality of players.
What's the differences between v3 and v4 btw? Maybe I will run v4 through it also when I get the time!
Hi mate!
I just wanted to let you know that I ran your Predator V3 through my custom database test (information about it on my thread). I must say, it's an insane BEAST in away matches!
What's the differences between v3 and v4 btw? Maybe I will run v4 through it also when I get the time!
Best wishes,
Mr L
******
THE TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED
OPPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THE OP AND THIS RECOMENDATION HAS BEEN ADDED TO OP: DON'T USE ANY OI AND DON'T LET YOUR ASSISTANT MANAGER TO SET ANY OI FOR YOU
CHANGES:
- tweaked the passing settings for WBL/WBR positions.
- tweaked the passing settings for DM postion.
Hi mate!
As I recall I only tweaked the crossing settings of WBL/WBR positions.
It's always nice to see when someone does any testing, especially, with such "smart" conditions like you have that attempt to reduce randomness but I'm afraid any testing like this can give only a very approximate result and it only can reveal very bad tactics and show just good tactics because FM is very well protected from such "brutal force" testing approaches that hope to find the best tactic and if you had time then read this my post it might give you some thoughts about how much effort it requires to find something using such testing approaches--->(post #174) http://www.fm-base.co.uk/forum/share-download-fm-16-tactics/350708-predator-fm16-18.html#post2902749
Anyway I wish you best luck in your testing and tactic creating!