Roman Abramovich's assets estimate 11billion

  • Thread starter Thread starter CJACKO11
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 21
  • Views Views 3K

Is Roman at Chelsea for the long haul?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 61.5%

  • No

    Votes: 10 38.5%
  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed .
C

CJACKO11

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2009
Messages
15,889
Reaction score
0
Points
0
For the first time Russian authorities have released a list of Mr Abramovich's assets. He is thought to be worth over 11billion pounds and assets range from houses to cars to real estate to other businesses. Here is some of the assets the 70billion include.

  • 22 Russian bank accounts containing £70m in cash.
  • £3m a year earned in interest on deposits in 2009.
  • Two homes in Moscow, seven flats in London [thought to be incorporated to form a mansion], three homes in France [including two in St Barts], two in the USA and two in Chukotka, north-east Russia.
  • 155,369 sq metres of Moscow commercial real estate, 162,000 sq metres in the US.
  • Seven cars: two BMWs, three Mercedes, a VW, and Range Rover
  • 100% ownership of Chelsea Limited, 100% of Lowndes Square Management Company Limited, 100% of Croe France Chateau de la Croe, and Eucla Investments Limited, 25% of Primerod International Limited, 100% of Wotton Overseas Holdings Limited, 100% of Camberley International Investments Limited.
Seems as if the 72million spend in the January transfer window really is short change for uncle Roman.

I want to add a poll on this also, i hear from alot of fans and somtimes Chelsea fans say i dont think Roman is this for the long haul. I have always believed he is, i think he loves the club and even if he wanted out he wouldnt just up and leave. When ever people question his love and dedication to Chelsea he always seems to prove them wrong, take this January for instance. My question is just basicly do you think Abramovich is in Chelsea Football Club for the long haul. Im not asking you to put what you want to happen but what you think, 2 different things.

Full Story here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/feb/16/roman-abramovich-wealth-chelsea-russia
 
Not really a surprise.
That guy is ****** rich, for god sake.
 
Just a small fortune then :P How I wish that a story like this comes out about the Glazers :(
 
that 11 billion is only a fraction of his wealth, remember this man is murky and is probably worth double that figure.
No doubt he'll stay at Chelsea for a long time, although he has spent alot to him it isn't much. If he invested a billion pounds into the club he wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
He is, amongst others, a prime example of how the 'fit and proper persons test' isn't fit for purpose, he's a crook and Chelsea fans should oppose his ownership reagrdless of the success he's brought to the club

Just a small fortune then How I wish that a story like this comes out about the Glazers
Click to expand...

they have a very tidy personal fortune, however their businesses are failing miserably in the US and United are effectivly propping them up. Again they won't lose sleep as it has very little effect on them if United, or any of their interests, went under
 
sween123 said:
that 11 billion is only a fraction of his wealth, remember this man is murky and is probably worth double that figure.
No doubt he'll stay at Chelsea for a long time, although he has spent alot to him it isn't much. If he invested a billion pounds into the club he wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
He is, amongst others, a prime example of how the 'fit and proper persons test' isn't fit for purpose, he's a crook and Chelsea fans should oppose his ownership reagrdless of the success he's brought to the club
Click to expand...

How is he a crook?
 
Your man's a Pauper LOL

54x5du.jpg
 
Roman is still pretty young. And so is our Sheikh :D So i believe he is for the long haul.
I would like a thing like this about Sheikh Mansour :D
 
sween123 said:
that 11 billion is only a fraction of his wealth, remember this man is murky and is probably worth double that figure.
No doubt he'll stay at Chelsea for a long time, although he has spent alot to him it isn't much. If he invested a billion pounds into the club he wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
He is, amongst others, a prime example of how the 'fit and proper persons test' isn't fit for purpose, he's a crook and Chelsea fans should oppose his ownership reagrdless of the success he's brought to the club



they have a very tidy personal fortune, however their businesses are failing miserably in the US and United are effectivly propping them up. Again they won't lose sleep as it has very little effect on them if United, or any of their interests, went under
Click to expand...

what bullshit.

what evidence do you have that he's a crook; because he's russian and he's rich? grow the **** up.
 
Doesn't a £50m Spanish Striker count as an asset? I mean that's like 1000 BMW's!

But I believe he's in it for the long haul, £72m in one window is a lot to spend if you're planning on upping and leaving in a few years.
 
samillyroy said:
what bullshit.

what evidence do you have that he's a crook; because he's russian and he's rich? grow the **** up.
Click to expand...

He has admitted paying money for political favours. All depends on your definition of a crook. All that is for another day though.

Obviously a very wealthy man.

---------- Post added at 10:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:00 PM ----------

Joel` said:
Doesn't a £50m Spanish Striker count as an asset? I mean that's like 1000 BMW's!

But I believe he's in it for the long haul, £72m in one window is a lot to spend if you're planning on upping and leaving in a few years.
Click to expand...

The club own him, he doesn't :) The clubs is mentioned.
 
Andy said:
He has admitted paying money for political favours. All depends on your definition of a crook. All that is for another day though.

Obviously a very wealthy man.
Click to expand...

That's just politics.
 
Does this fortunes include Arsenal?
Because his team owns them again every 6 months or so...
 
that's different, doesn't make him a crook.
the man's never been charged with any criminal offence so to simply label him a crook is pathetic and unneccessary - most likely jealousy.
 
Joel` said:
That's just politics.
Click to expand...

All relates back to politics. But paying money to the Russian govt then they drop charges etc is dodgy.

As I said before, this thread isn't on how he got his money but just how rich he is. Things looking good for Chelsea.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top