The Chelsea Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ramires
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 35K
  • Views Views 3M
Chelski Shogun said:
I wouldn't be going mad if Balotelli did it because in the end Chelsea won the game. As for saying Costa's a cheat, you're way off, he likes a physical battle but that's far from being a cheat (It's called passion) and Costa respects defenders that give it back, he likes a battle.
Click to expand...

i ment if chelsea didnt win the game liverpool win one nil after balotelli clearly stamps on 2 players. he is a dirty **** was when he was with atletico madrid and still is now he is at chelsea
 
PA11111 said:
What are you talking about utter rubbish it was two clear stamps and he deserves a ban. you can bet you bullocks if it was suarez he would be banned and called a cheat by every tom, **** and harry
Click to expand...

It wasn't cheating, technically. Being a **** isn't really cheating.
 
PA11111 said:
i ment if chelsea didnt win the game liverpool win one nil after balotelli clearly stamps on 2 players. he is a dirty **** was when he was with atletico madrid and still is now he is at chelsea
Click to expand...

He's the sort of player you hate as an an opposing fan, however as a Chelsea fan you love him, but just like Saurez there's no denying he's quality. Also refs all season have been s**t and it wasn't any different today, both teams had decisions that didn't go their way.
 
PA11111 said:
ohh excuse me then its called being a ****
Click to expand...

Indeed it is. Much like Suarez was.

Costa will get fined and maybe banned if the rules allow it, and that'll be his comeuppance. To discuss what he was doing is to gloss over how the game progressed.
 
Chelski Shogun said:
He's the sort of player you hate as an an opposing fan, however as a Chelsea fan you love him, but just like Saurez there's no denying he's quality. Also refs all season have been s**t and it wasn't any different today, both teams had decisions that didn't go their way.
Click to expand...

yea he is alot like suraez im sure chelsea fans love costa just as much as we loves suraez. nothing new with refs being **** the standard of refereeing in england is shocking
 
PA11111 said:
yea he is alot like suraez im sure chelsea fans love costa just as much as we loves suraez. nothing new with refs being **** the standard of refereeing in england is shocking
Click to expand...

And to think that the Head of English Officials Mike Riley came out a couple of days ago and said that refereeing standards are better than ever, what a p***k! He deserves the sack if that's his honest opinion.
 
Not sure if what Costa did was intentional. Its more like...he intentionally doesn't jump over. And if something bad happens, it happens. Obviously a **** move, doubt it warrants a ban though.
 
Surprised people seem shocked by this, like suarez at ajax costa was also a massive ***** at atletico, nothing new.
 
PA11111 said:
What are you talking about utter rubbish it was two clear stamps and he deserves a ban. you can bet you bullocks if it was suarez he would be banned and called a cheat by every tom, **** and harry
Click to expand...

Battling with defenders is not cheating. It's called passion and aggressiveness. Cheating is when Suarez uses his hands to block a goal-bound shot or continuously dives to fool refs
 
Alcaraz said:
Battling with defenders is not cheating. It's called passion and aggressiveness. Cheating is when Suarez uses his hands to block a goal-bound shot or continuously dives to fool refs
Click to expand...


because stamping on people is so much better
 
Alcaraz said:
Cheating is when Suarez uses his hands to block a goal-bound shot or continuously dives to fool refs
Click to expand...

You mean at the World Cup? Technically that wasn't cheating. Not to say Suarez is not a cheat, but I didn't see that particular case as cheating. He made a play that was against the rules and both him and his team got penalized according to the rules. Its no different then a foul.

PA11111 said:
either way he is a dirty ****
Click to expand...

Hah, I don't think anybody's arguing against it.
 
Tyton said:
You mean at the World Cup? Technically that wasn't cheating. Not to say Suarez is not a cheat, but I didn't see that particular case as cheating. He made a play that was against the rules and both him and his team got penalized according to the rules. Its no different then a foul.
Click to expand...

Then what would constitute somebody cheating then? A bad tackle is a foul but a tackle is accepted as part of the game that was done badly. Both sets of players step onto the field consenting to being tackled. However, using your hands as an outfield player is not an accepted part of the game
 
Tyton said:
Not sure if what Costa did was intentional. Its more like...he intentionally doesn't jump over. And if something bad happens, it happens. Obviously a **** move, doubt it warrants a ban though.
Click to expand...

FWIW I think the first one was a stamp and the second wasn't deliberate. Hey ho.
 
Alcaraz said:
Battling with defenders is not cheating. It's called passion and aggressiveness. Cheating is when Suarez uses his hands to block a goal-bound shot or continuously dives to fool refs
Click to expand...


Actually not quite true. How you battle with them matters as to whether its cheating or not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top