Read the last two pages. PSG are up and coming and pushing for a title tilt. Hardly going to stonewall his career, they are building a very strong side in a bid to return to CL
oh please,
1. EPL>>>>Ligue 1
2. Chelsea>>>>PSG
We can offer him good wages, great first team opportunites, he will be at our club with a great manager whhich has a great ambition, will be playing in the best league in the world for a club challenging for trophies on all fronts
Whilst moving to PSG is just a massive gamble, who knows they might not win the League, they will take some time to adjust to the CL and as far as I am concerned there team is not as strong as Chelsea's no way
Dont "Oh please" me, read my post instead of coming to me with some childish attitude because a player may not sign for you.
And the bit in bold is somewhat nonsensical, Chelsea might not win the league either.PSG have got a very strong side, that only getting better with their signings
well.... this argument is getting slightly stupid, you are suggesting players will want to move to france instead of England?
just put yourself in Pastoe shoes, if both Chelsea and PSG come at you with a offer which club would you go to?
Read what i said, and dont put words in my mouth. I've clearly set out why he might move to PSG instead of Chelsea.
your reasons were that PSG is building a strong team and they will probably be in the CL next year
Which is exactly what we are doing.....and we are already in the CL
pointless argument really. french teams will never be as good as English teams. and if pastore goes to PSG, it will be because of the money, we still can offer him better wages, but lets not forget that PSG are the man shity of France.
pointless argument really. french teams will never be as good as English teams. and if pastore goes to PSG, it will be because of the money, we still can offer him better wages, but lets not forget that PSG are the man shity of France.
Any team has the ability to surprise another team, regardless of where they are from. Look what happened to Glasgow Rangers this week
You were the Man City of England, dont be so judgemental, and if he goes for the money, his choice. You two have been pretty arrogant about players signing for you recently
Plus the fact that we are being linked with players such as Modric etc while PSG are being linked with Taarabt...
So its quite obvious by all accounts that we are a much much much more attractive destination and all the reasons you stated Mike are bing done by Chelsea too except to a much great and successfull degree
Its simply arrogant to dismiss then. Lyon have been trumping Real Madrid in the CL time after time again until recently
oh please,
1. EPL>>>>Ligue 1
2. Chelsea>>>>PSG
We can offer him good wages, great first team opportunites, he will be at our club with a great manager whhich has a great ambition, will be playing in the best league in the world for a club challenging for trophies on all fronts
Whilst moving to PSG is just a massive gamble, who knows they might not win the League, they will take some time to adjust to the CL and as far as I am concerned there team is not as strong as Chelsea's no way
Mike.;1261481[B said:]You were the Man City of England[/B], dont be so judgemental, and if he goes for the money, his choice. You two have been pretty arrogant about players signing for you recently
????
So we are being arrogant that a player will sign for us over PSG, its like saying y is being arrogant because a player preferes his team Barcelona over Aston Villa
Who says you are a much more attractive destination? Clearly you are just picking bits and ignoring what i say, so i wont waste my time debating this
Its simply arrogant to dismiss then. Lyon have been trumping Real Madrid in the CL time after time again until recently
You miss the point entirely. PSG are approaching things the way you and Man City did...