The Chelsea Thread

[TheRealMourinho]

does anyone know if ramires is available for the arsenal game?

 

[Alcaraz]

does anyone know if ramires is available for the arsenal game?

he probably will be as he was 50/50 for the QPR Game and he sat out the midweek Carling Cup tie ... I am guessing AVB wanted him back to full fitness before throwing him into a match

 

[sunilvk7]

Why is Chelsea's official website such a classless site.

It's rumoured the people who clean the Ivorian's boots still occasionally find pieces of Senderos among the studs.

Official website talking like this and called City money bags. Sigh

The Gunners have won only three of our last 19 meetings in all competitions over the last seven-and-a-half years. Their last piece of silverware was the 2005 FA Cup when they defeated Manchester United on penalties at the Millennium Stadium. Since then Chelsea have won two Premier League titles, three FA Cups, the League Cup and two Community Shields.

To prove Chelsea have only 7-8 years history, they are just talking about last 7 and half years.

And the chief was talking about "Beating **** out of Arsenal". Please. If that comes from a fan it is understandable, but official sites and person who holds higher position in the club? Pathetic.

 

[Alcaraz]

Why is Chelsea's official website such a classless site.


Official website talking like this and called City money bags. Sigh



To prove Chelsea have only 7-8 years history, they are just talking about last 7 and half years.

And the chief was talking about "Beating **** out of Arsenal". Please. If that comes from a fan it is understandable, but official sites and person who holds higher position in the club? Pathetic.

The first quote is definitely stupid but please do no try go back to the... You only have 8 years of history arguement

And Bruce Buck said that to rally the Chelsea supporters at the CPO meeting, it is hardly a crime for him to say that lets thrash Arsenal because he is as much a fan as the rest of us... maybe some people might be uneasy but its hardly a big issue

I have no problem if anyone from another club says that mind you...

 

[sunilvk7]

The first quote is definitely stupid but please do no try go back to the... You only have 8 years of history arguement

And Bruce Buck said that to rally the Chelsea supporters at the CPO meeting, it is hardly a crime for him to say that lets thrash Arsenal because he is as much a fan as the rest of us... maybe some people might be uneasy but its hardly a big issue

I have no problem if anyone from another club says that mind you...

I didnt start the history argument. The way official website talking about just last 7 years is so funny. And please person who is in responsible position in the club should show respect to the opponents. Maybe you see it in a different way, the way I see it is very disrespectful.

 

[dasty]

So what do you expect the Chelsea official website to say? That Arsenal had won more games than Chelsea throughout their 100 year history? When you bring up stats you talk about recent stats that are actually more relevant, instead of something that happened decades ago.

When you talk about recent form of your own club you try to make it look as amazing as possible. 3 defeats out of 19 games against Arsenal is a tremendous statistic no matter what you think. It doesn't even matter how long Chelsea had been relevant.

 

[sunilvk7]

So what do you expect the Chelsea official website to say?

Something that makes sense? It is not that hard to make it. Also piece on Drogba was as classy as they come. *rolleyes*

 

[Snypar]

Why is Chelsea's official website such a classless site.


Official website talking like this and called City money bags. Sigh

I'm sure that's meant to be taken as a joke...


If I go to the Utd site, are you saying it'll all classy and that there will be no sly remarks about a team?

 

[Alcaraz]

Something that makes sense? It is not that hard to make it. Also piece on Drogba was as classy as they come. *rolleyes*

he did not even mention the Drogba piece, all he mentioned was the paragraph on Arsenal to which u did not retort

Also Sunil I dont see how the issue of respect-disrespect comes into the equation... All Bruce said to rally the supporters was to lets thrash Arsenal to pump everyone up, I dont see how that has to do anything with respect as he did not insult Arsenal in any sense and I think ur just making a big thing out of a relatively small matter


Also Ramires is back! Officially confirmed on the Chelsea website

 

[sunilvk7]

he did not even mention the Drogba piece, all he mentioned was the paragraph on Arsenal to which u did not retort

Also Sunil I dont see how the issue of respect-disrespect comes into the equation... All Bruce said to rally the supporters was to lets thrash Arsenal to pump everyone up, I dont see how that has to do anything with respect as he did not insult Arsenal in any sense and I think ur just making a big thing out of a relatively small matter


Also Ramires is back! Officially confirmed on the Chelsea website

I was just talking about the whole prematch page tbf.

Also I said we both see it in a different way.

I'm not really making it any big or crying for someone to be punished, I have said many times, probably Chelsea is the only official site which takes digs at opponents. I was just pointing out the obvious.

---------- Post added at 05:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:56 PM ----------

I'm sure that's meant to be taken as a joke...


If I go to the Utd site, are you saying it'll all classy and that there will be no sly remarks about a team?

Go and post something on United side taking digs at opponents like calling City as money bags when Chelsea was saved by oil money. Hypocrites.

 

[Snypar]

I was just talking about the whole prematch page tbf.

Also I said we both see it in a different way.

I'm not really making it any big or crying for someone to be punished, I have said many times, probably Chelsea is the only official site which takes digs at opponents. I was just pointing out the obvious.

---------- Post added at 05:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:56 PM ----------



Go and post something on United side taking digs at opponents like calling City as money bags when Chelsea was saved by oil money. Hypocrites.

I found the Senderos remark, but can't find the City remark. Mind linking it?

 

[sunilvk7]

I found the Senderos remark, but can't find the City remark. Mind linking it?

It was from last years. Google for Chelsea vs City preview. I haven't saved that link.

 

[Alcaraz]

I was just talking about the whole prematch page tbf.

Also I said we both see it in a different way.

I'm not really making it any big or crying for someone to be punished, I have said many times, probably Chelsea is the only official site which takes digs at opponents. I was just pointing out the obvious.

---------- Post added at 05:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:56 PM ----------



Go and post something on United side taking digs at opponents like calling City as money bags when Chelsea was saved by oil money. Hypocrites.

not exactly.... you were all about how it disrespects opponents and stuff and saying how unclassy it was ffs... did not look like u were not all worked up about it

 

[ChrisBird]

I fail to see what Bruce Buck said wrong...

An album Mata uploaded on FB of him sightseeing in London - London: Personal album | Facebook

Oh, and that match preview did include stats from before recent years, if you click on the tab 'We Have History' you will see stuff from before 8 years ago. But that bit with Senderos was childish.

 

[Alcaraz]

I fail to see what Bruce Buck said wrong...

An album Mata uploaded on FB of him sightseeing in London - London: Personal album | Facebook

Oh, and that match preview did include stats from before recent years, if you click on the tab 'We Have History' you will see stuff from before 8 years ago. But that bit with Senderos was childish.

exactly, just read the preview myself... Selective Reading wont get you very far Sunil

 

[Subtle]

I love how we're accused of being a club with no passion but the second Bruce makes a tongue in cheek and, imo, funny comment as a way of ending a piece of disappointing news, suddenly he's pathetic. Alcaraz has basically destroyed that complaint though, so I'll leave it at that.

Is Mata available vs Arsenal? I know he went off with a knock and I've been a bit too busy to keep up with things this week.

 

[sunilvk7]

exactly, just read the preview myself... Selective Reading wont get you very far Sunil

not exactly.... you were all about how it disrespects opponents and stuff and saying how unclassy it was ffs... did not look like u were not all worked up about it

Worked up because you made fun of City and Arsenal? ffs, if anything I liked those comments but at the same time it is classless.

I just pointed out the points that made fun of opponents, how is that a selective reading?

---------- Post added at 10:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:24 PM ----------

I quoted Drogba part and also said about calling City money bags which is classless. I dont know how is it selective reading. I'm yet to see preview in any other official sites that makes fun of opponents.

And also did Chelsea include trophies won since 2005 for the game against United? I didn't check so it is a genuine question.

 

[ChrisBird]

I love how we're accused of being a club with no passion but the second Bruce makes a tongue in cheek and, imo, funny comment as a way of ending a piece of disappointing news, suddenly he's pathetic. Alcaraz has basically destroyed that complaint though, so I'll leave it at that.

Is Mata available vs Arsenal? I know he went off with a knock and I've been a bit too busy to keep up with things this week.

Haha I know, lol.

Well Mata posted on Twitter/Facebook that his shoulder is fine, so I'd imagine so:

@juanmata10 Juan Mata García By-the-way my shoulder is fine! On Wednesday Carling Cup tie at Everton

 

[Subtle]

Excellent! I have a history of cursing players by buying their shirt and I wore my Mata one for the 2nd time over the weekend lol.


@Sunil
You can't win this argument. The fact that your second post already contained the infamous and ever popular 'well that's my interpretation' excuse sure have been a clear sign that you should stop. I am intrigued however, to see how "We are all Chelsea fans and I can only hope that, on Saturday, we all get together, support this club and beat the **** out of Arsenal" = "you made fun of [...]Arsenal."

I haven't seen the source of the no cups before 2005 dispute so it would be nice if you could post that.

 

[sunilvk7]

@Sunil
You can't win this argument. The fact that your second post already contained the infamous and ever popular 'well that's my interpretation' excuse sure have been a clear sign that you should stop. I am intrigued however, to see how "We are all Chelsea fans and I can only hope that, on Saturday, we all get together, support this club and beat the **** out of Arsenal" = "you made fun of [...]Arsenal."

I haven't seen the source of the no cups before 2005 dispute so it would be nice if you could post that.

I have no intention to argue, I'm just posting what I saw on your site. Yes, Bruce words will be interpreted in so many ways and I agreed with that. So what is your excuse for Drogba comment and calling City as money bags?

Edit: Excuse? BS. Only people making excuses are obvious ones. Bruce words are indeed disrespectful .

---------- Post added at 12:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:31 AM ----------

But that bit with Senderos was childish.

Exactly. I agree that I interpreted Bruce words in a different way than Chelsea fans, but the comment about Drogba and ManCity was Childish/pathetic/Classless whatever.

I'm not even arguing, I'm just quoting what Chelsea site posted.