The Chelsea Thread
- Thread starter Ramires
- Start date
- Replies 35K
- Views 3M
Choice of words. A normal Chelsea supporter saying that would be different from a person who has a big role in the club.
Lets beat Arsenal is not disrespectful but lets beat **** out of Arsenal is.
Again selective reading. Main point was about Drogba and Senderos, funny how it got diverted.
Again, why?
It's not saying anything derogatory about Arsenal at all. Arsenal were not ridiculed, nothing negative was it implied; what it was, at worst, was some tongue in cheek humour about how we should make up for disappointment off the pitch with a romping win over our derby rivals.
If you disagree please give more substantiation than 'because it is!' As for the Drogba/City thing, they're definitely up for debate although you have to assume no one who is cleared to write for the Chelsea website would be ignorant enough to call City "moneybags" without a hint of playful irony.
I wont be adding anything apart from this. He is in a big role and should be knowing better.
Drogba is not up for debate. It is childish
I dont see anything playful here apart from hypocrisy.
Anyways I'm done. I have said many times Bruce words are interpreted in many ways, which was not the point. Point was about Drobga which got ignored. Shame that official site publish **** like the Drogba and ManCity ones.
Drogba one is not up for debate, it is childish certainly but pretty fun as well lol
And you basically shot yourself fin the leg by saying that Bruce's words can be intepreted in different ways
---------- Post added at 02:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:00 PM ----------
Anybody remembers the Di Matte Goal vs Arsenal way back in 1998, if a goal like that is scored today.. prepare for the roofs to be lifted lol
Anyways enjoy the night Di Matteo shot the Gunners Down..
Di matteo vs arsenal...best quality - YouTube
So when it comes down to it, you're unable to explain why even you think it's offensive, yet alone why most people should? *sigh*
How do you guys think we'll line up today? Anything special to counter Arsenal's threats?
How do you guys think we'll line up today? Anything special to counter Arsenal's threats?
Well I suppose we will go with a normal front three of Mata-Torres-Sturridge... we dont have 2 many options to play around with anyways
I think we should play Iva ahead of Bosingwa tho, Iva is a more rounded RB in my opinion while Bosingwa can be a liability in defence at times and Bosingwa is not all that good on the attack as many people like to think, I hardly ever see him give an accurate cross while Iva is pretty good on the attack
Honestly feel Iva should be out First-Choice RB, otherwise a normal Central Defensive Partnership of Luiz and Terry and at LB Cole
Hopefully Ramires is able to play the full 90min for us, he is probably our best Midfielder atm and he offers so much on the counter which is where Arsenal are vulnerable... along with him Lamps and Meirless who will play the Anchor Man Role
City are known as the new moneybags by media and everyone and even compared to Chelsea are moneybags, lighten the **** up jesus christ. And the Drogba one is just light hearted humour thats all, we all complain that clubs are up tight etc but when they liven up abit this happens.
The main problem is if Roman was to leave us in the future and for whatever reason we had to leave the new stadium we wouldnt have one to go back too. Also they are talking about a 60k seater and lets be honest we would only fill that out 5-6 times a season. The location is a massive problem too, the club need to provide more details of where, when and capacity before they ask again simple as that.
Why would they do that?? It is Chelsea's website so it wants to make Chelsea look good so why would they include something to make us look worse that our opponents?? You are making something out of nothing here and if you get annoyed with something as small as this i'd reccomend you dont go to Stamford Bridge because im sure you will only moan about Neil Barnett at HT too as he is like this. Basicly just stay away from everything Chelsea as it will make it easy for you.
I dont think we will worry about Arsenal's threats mate because we have many more threats than them. Starting line-up will more than likely be.
Cech
Ivanovic
Luiz
Terry
Cole
Meireles
Ramires
Lampard
Mata
Sturridge
Torres
I quoted Drogba part and also said Bruce words can be interpreted in many ways. Dont think everyone will see them with blue glasses on.
Drogba part and ManCity part are very childish, obvious ones. I have said many times, this is not about Bruce, this is about Chelsea official site making childish remarks or classless remarks.
Couldn't agree more, - if Arshavin decides this is a game he wants to turn up to, we'll need Iva to hold him back- but isn't Bosingwa suspended anyway?
I'd rather see Mikel as the DM, Meireles is good when we're playing little teams but a bit defensively frail for such a big game. I cant see him being able to pick up RVP either.
I can see RVP vs Luiz ending badly for us though, and if they push Arteta back and play
................RVP......................
Walcott-Arshavin-The Forehead
they will be very dangerous.
Last edited:
They are tongue and cheek jokes!!!!!!!
So other sites can publish Chelsea as Roman's ***** and there will be nothing to moan about it. Isn't it. You can call light hearted humor whatever ****, at the end of the day it was childish.
Oh I have heard a lot about him and his classless comments.
Well its lucky you think we should play Brana insted of Bozzy because Bozzy is suspended anyway.
Still childish. It is official site ffs, not some random blog.
But its a joke thats the whole point. Like i said if i were you i'd stear away from Chelsea related stuff if this has annoyed you.
Professional foul is 1 game suspension, which he served against Everton. I have him in my FT. Dont want to **** it up now.
---------- Post added at 03:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:51 PM ----------
Why will it annoy me lol. It is related to Arsenal and City. I said those are just childish. Why will I get worked up for something that is not even related to ManUtd lol.
Dont complain about it then lol, you remind me of them people that complain when someone swears on TV before 10.
Like you lot did when Rooney did saying Sky pay his wages?
Its not even complaining though, this is forum and this is Chelsea thread. What do you expect me to post? You lot search for something against United likewise we lot will post anything negative we find about Chelsea. It is not rocket science
Like you lot did when Rooney did saying Sky pay his wages?
I didnt complain to Sky, im not that petty.
xhellmagic
Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2010
- Messages
- 39
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
To be fair, i think its not really appropriate for someone holding a high position in the club to speak like that. But then again, most of you don't take it offensively. It might be just that me and sunilvk7 are easily offended.