The Chelsea Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ramires
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 35K
  • Views Views 3M
He hasnt joined us yet, calm the **** down. Jesus. Don't swallow the bait, that's what he wants. the ******* arrogant mug.
 
A manager who does not want Hazard must be mad! I do not see a manager who would not want to have Hazard

Let me disagree with you. Every manager has his own style and ideas. We're not talking about Messi here. Please calm down.
 
I never said that, we currently do not have a manager employed so someone has to build this squad other wise we get left behind. The potential new manager will know our squad and if he doesn't want Hazard then he doesn't take the job.

I know that, but I am sure it is off putting for other managers seeing the owner dealing with transfers.
 
I know that, but I am sure it is off putting for other managers seeing the owner dealing with transfers.

But whoever takes the job knows already the pressure of this job along with they wont be 100% in charge so it's something they have to agree too.
 
It does not make any sense. What if the manager that takes over prefers not to play with an AMC behind the striker but two up top or a 4-1-2-2-1? Is Abramovich only going to take a manager that agrees to use an AMC?

Because I believe that Hazard has said he wants to play in the number 10 role behind the striker.

Plus, with all his antics and unprofessional behavior, what high-profile manager (because apparently that is what Abramovich is looking for) wants that?
 
It does not make any sense. What if the manager that takes over prefers not to play with an AMC behind the striker but two up top or a 4-1-2-2-1? Is Abramovich only going to take a manager that agrees to use an AMC?

Because I believe that Hazard has said he wants to play in the number 10 role behind the striker.

Plus, with all his antics and unprofessional behavior, what high-profile manager (because apparently that is what Abramovich is looking for) wants that?

Hazard has said everything. At various points this season he has said that he will be joining about ten different clubs. He has a new twitter/media storm cooking up every week.

Stop buying into this weasels cunty little games, let his football do the talking if he ever makes it to these shores.
 
It does not make any sense. What if the manager that takes over prefers not to play with an AMC behind the striker but two up top or a 4-1-2-2-1? Is Abramovich only going to take a manager that agrees to use an AMC?

Because I believe that Hazard has said he wants to play in the number 10 role behind the striker.

Plus, with all his antics and unprofessional behavior, what high-profile manager (because apparently that is what Abramovich is looking for) wants that?

That that manager does not take the job does he? It's as simple as that.
 
Football_Tweet ‏@Football_Tweet_
Eden Hazard v Shinji Kagawa statistics: Games: 192/198. Goals: 50/86. Assists: 38/45. Cost: €35m/€20m... (Via @total_dribble)

Based on the stats above, I will be really happy if he goes to Chelsea and we get Kagawa :)

Both quality but in totally different league, Kagawa's side smashed the league this season but Hazards didn't so for him to still get them figures and win player of the year is something sensational.
 
yet it doesnt mention the fact Kagawa is older the Hazard and more experienced?

In what way is Kagawa more experienced?

Hazard has been playing regular football (25+ games a season) since the 2008/9 season. Kagawa has only been in Europe just over 18 months!
 
Both quality but in totally different league, Kagawa's side smashed the league this season but Hazards didn't so for him to still get them figures and win player of the year is something sensational.

Still German league is way ahead of French in terms of quality. If you check Hazards stats he hasn't performed at all against top sides in France and in CL.

But also most of Kagawa's stats come from Japan which isn't so competive league either. You can really only judge Kagawa vs Hazard from 2010 on.
 
yet it doesnt mention the fact Kagawa is older the Hazard and more experienced?

Based on the statistics with an almost identical number of games played, Kagawa is currently the better player and is much cheaper it would seem. In addition to the way Hazard conducted himself over the past few months, I would much rather have Kagawa in the United team than Hazard.
 
In what way is Kagawa more experienced?

Hazard has been playing regular football (25+ games a season) since the 2008/9 season. Kagawa has only been in Europe just over 18 months!

jesus i just looked up kagawa and saw his only 23! I thought he was about 26-27 and I was assuming he has been playing first team footbal llonger then Hazard.
 
Football_Tweet ‏@Football_Tweet_
Eden Hazard v Shinji Kagawa statistics: Games: 192/198. Goals: 50/86. Assists: 38/45. Cost: €35m/€20m... (Via @total_dribble)

Based on the stats above, I will be really happy if he goes to Chelsea and we get Kagawa :)

Hazard - Apps: 41(3) Goals: 20 Assists: 17
Kagawa- Apps: 36(4) Goals: 17 Assists: 8

Previous seasons are less relevant, we aren't signing Hazard on his performances when he was 17 we are signing him based on his performances over the last couple of seasons, in particular the one just gone. Also Kagawa has one year left on his contract, whereas Hazard has three which is another reason for the gap in price.
 
Still German league is way ahead of French in terms of quality. If you check Hazards stats he hasn't performed at all against top sides in France and in CL.

But also most of Kagawa's stats come from Japan which isn't so competive league either. You can really only judge Kagawa vs Hazard from 2010 on.

This is true. But will still be happier if we got Kagawa tbh
 
Back
Top