The Chelsea Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ramires
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 35K
  • Views Views 3M
Lol. Almost 7 years in England, and still gives interviews in Spanish. I think he's trying pretty hard not to learn it.

Lost his captaincy at Corinthians because he refused to learn Brazilian, the man is a joke. A fantastic player of a joke but still a joke lol.
 
I take that it may have been a misunderstanding more than anything but that doesn't mean we shouldn't have reported it. Whar i will also say is that his assistants are his friends, i'd lie for my friend if i was in the same boat. Like i say i think it was just a misunderstanding but it would have been wrong if we didn't back Ramires.

The same could be said about Cole for Terry...
 
I take that it may have been a misunderstanding more than anything but that doesn't mean we shouldn't have reported it. Whar i will also say is that his assistants are his friends, i'd lie for my friend if i was in the same boat. Like i say i think it was just a misunderstanding but it would have been wrong if we didn't back Ramires.

I think they are friends in a professional manner. I doubt any would lie, as it would put them in the firing line also if it was found out to be true, and would need all four of them to lie together, perfectly.
 
I think they are friends in a professional manner. I doubt any would lie, as it would put them in the firing line also if it was found out to be true, and would need all four of them to lie together, perfectly.

The fact is, there was no evidence found anywhere, at all.
 
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Especially when you consider the nonsense that came from Chelsea after Terry. Refs get decision wrong all the time. You've had them go in your favour.

Oh, please Mike. Do not. I can't have this discussion again.
 
The same could be said about Cole for Terry...

True, what i will say was that Cole's reaction on Twitter did make me believe he was not lying but that's just my opinion. He seemed pretty upset about it all.

I think they are friends in a professional manner. I doubt any would lie, as it would put them in the firing line also if it was found out to be true, and would need all four of them to lie together, perfectly.

I agree its un-likely but im just saying i'd lie for my mate all day long and they didn't even have to get their story straight just say "no didn't hear it", not hard.

This may sound stupid but i wrote a blog on the racism thing and Chelsea and as we all know the FA go on the doubt of probability and i think they are missing a trick. Go on Jeremy Kyle and get everyone involved to take the lie detector test which they say is 99.9% accurate and surely that counts as enough probability. Plus it would make EXCELLENT tv lol.
 
This may sound stupid but i wrote a blog on the racism thing and Chelsea and as we all know the FA go on the doubt of probability and i think they are missing a trick. Go on Jeremy Kyle and get everyone involved to take the lie detector test which they say is 99.9% accurate and surely that counts as enough probability. Plus it would make EXCELLENT tv lol.

Surprised many footballers haven't already been on Jeremy Kyle already to be honest. :P
 
Surprised many footballers haven't already been on Jeremy Kyle already to be honest. :P

I used to work with someone who went on there. Was going out with a girl (he was mid 20's) and he left her for her sister who was 16!!!! Welcome to Portsmouth lol.
 
True, what i will say was that Cole's reaction on Twitter did make me believe he was not lying but that's just my opinion. He seemed pretty upset about it all.



I agree its un-likely but im just saying i'd lie for my mate all day long and they didn't even have to get their story straight just say "no didn't hear it", not hard.

This may sound stupid but i wrote a blog on the racism thing and Chelsea and as we all know the FA go on the doubt of probability and i think they are missing a trick. Go on Jeremy Kyle and get everyone involved to take the lie detector test which they say is 99.9% accurate and surely that counts as enough probability. Plus it would make EXCELLENT tv lol.

A lie detector is not 99.9% accurate or even close.

Surely the more significant point that DarloGeorge was making is that Chelsea should apologise for almost wrecking a man's career, regardless of their intentions.
 
A lie detector is not 99.9% accurate or even close.

Surely the more significant point that DarloGeorge was making is that Chelsea should apologise for almost wrecking a man's career, regardless of their intentions.

That's not what they say on Jezza!
 
Wow hey, we almost went full 24 hours without drama. I am dissapoint.
 
That's just the general, we hate Chelsea as they have no history that most people feel, coupled with our need to be defensive due to our lack of success these past few years.

Also, you've been targeted? What? Really?... No.. Of course you haven't. In fact, what does that even mean?

What I mean is plenty of Liverpool fans in the past have started giving it about all the history and about being the bigger bigger club calling Chelsea **** etc trying to start arguments. Lost count how many times on Xbox live after playing a Liverpool fan on FIFA they feel the need to send me a message regarding their hatred for Chelsea.
 
I see Chelsea still havent apologised. Then again didn't expect them to. Also see they havent paid any compensation seeing as he losts out on 4 weeks match fees. Maybe more if he had reffed mid-week. They also havent apologised for barging into his dressing room after the match and giving him greif. You say that you should have reported it but you had no evidence what so ever. All you had was the word of a player who had lots of adreniline flowing through him. The very least you could do is have kept it private for a while and not announce it less the an hour and a half after the game. But then again this is Chelsea, the team who defened someone who quite clearly says called Anton a ....... Then came up with the excuse that it was banter and sarcastic. Oh and also defended a player who shot someone on work experiance. Say that physio had an affair with Mike Phelan but he broke it off a few weeks before the match. Then she said she got sexual assulted by Mike Phelan at HT. Should Chelsea have reported that straight away with no evidence what so ever?
 
Chelsea were right to complain if a player felt he was abused, they followed the rulebook. If you thought you were abused and went to a club representative with a complaint you'd expect them to go down the right channels for justice or an investigation. Which is what happened.

Its down to the player to apologise in my opinion if he tried to tar the refs reputation.
 
I see Chelsea still havent apologised. Then again didn't expect them to. Also see they havent paid any compensation seeing as he losts out on 4 weeks match fees. Maybe more if he had reffed mid-week. They also havent apologised for barging into his dressing room after the match and giving him greif. You say that you should have reported it but you had no evidence what so ever. All you had was the word of a player who had lots of adreniline flowing through him. The very least you could do is have kept it private for a while and not announce it less the an hour and a half after the game. But then again this is Chelsea, the team who defened someone who quite clearly says called Anton a ....... Then came up with the excuse that it was banter and sarcastic. Oh and also defended a player who shot someone on work experiance. Say that physio had an affair with Mike Phelan but he broke it off a few weeks before the match. Then she said she got sexual assulted by Mike Phelan at HT. Should Chelsea have reported that straight away with no evidence what so ever?

1. Clattenburg was suspended with FULL pay, he lost out on no money what so ever.
2. Mikel has been charged with the whole barging into the dressing room and using insulting language.
3. Yes we should have reported it if one of our players was 100% certain he heard it, it would have be worse if we didn't report it. Our main concern was OUR player not the Clattenburg and we backed his word 100% like we should have.

You keep saying all this **** towards Chelsea which obviously shows you have a personal agenda against the club but where was your criticism of Utd when they didn't fine Rio for his racist tweet. We fined Terry which was a club record fee for a fine.
 
A lad just posted this on a Chelsea group and he swears its true which if it is true it wouldn't surprise me.

"Saw Michael Emenalo in car park gave him what for about Benitez's appointment he said right ok… at the end of the day we don't care bout the fans we are just doing what is best for the club"

Make of it what you will.
 
1. Clattenburg was suspended with FULL pay, he lost out on no money what so ever.
2. Mikel has been charged with the whole barging into the dressing room and using insulting language.
3. Yes we should have reported it if one of our players was 100% certain he heard it, it would have be worse if we didn't report it. Our main concern was OUR player not the Clattenburg and we backed his word 100% like we should have.

You keep saying all this **** towards Chelsea which obviously shows you have a personal agenda against the club but where was your criticism of Utd when they didn't fine Rio for his racist tweet. We fined Terry which was a club record fee for a fine.

You had to fine him. Anything else would have been terrible PR! We have no idea if Rio was fined because we usually dont make it public. Chelsea had to, to make a show of punishing him. Its a club record because he is one of you highest paid players in history. It was only 2 weeks ages.

The problem wasnt that you backed him, but that you totally jumped the gun by needlessly going public, without actually finding any corroborating evidence. And yet you doubted the VIDEO evidence against Terry. Thats why people are livid. Given what you had in support, it was reckless to go public so early.
 
A lad just posted this on a Chelsea group and he swears its true which if it is true it wouldn't surprise me.

"Saw Michael Emenalo in car park gave him what for about Benitez's appointment he said right ok… at the end of the day we don't care bout the fans we are just doing what is best for the club"

Make of it what you will.
If every board listened to the fans a lot of clubs would be in bad situations. Why would he care about the fans? Its just a job to him. He knows the fans will stick by the club no matter what,,
 
Back
Top