The Chelsea Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ramires
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 35K
  • Views Views 3M
Dunc said:
Because he's not suited for anywhere else on the pitch?
Click to expand...

This. He doesn't have mental disiscipline and responsibility to play anywhere..But as it is , with his physical presence , decent passing, good powershot, drive to go forward, i figure he can do the least bad as holding mid. And it does require more concentration, but at the same time his fuckups cost less. But yeah its all potato tomato, if i could have any player in the world i would send him chopping wood.
 
Nick Chelsea said:
Luiz is a billion times more effective in the midfield. Why am I not surprised.
Click to expand...

Decent going forward but he needs to know when to go and when not to go. At times there was too much space in where he should have been. For a critic of him playing in midfield he did pretty well today but all be it against average opponents.

GodCubed said:
GOD ******* DAMMIT SAVAGE
Click to expand...

I nearly punched my TV when he said that about Mikel! Even had a "Chelsea fan" on Facebook slating Mikel at Halftime saying "he cannot pass". ******* pleb!

zzeezzy said:
Leeds United will give you a better game than these next week...
Click to expand...

They probably will but we could have raised our game today if we needed too. Jet lag set in after 60mins you could see that.
 
only saw first half luiz looked immense going forward, that ball he played for hazard after doing that little bit of skill in keeping the ball on about 5 mins was first class, liked him alot in that role. thought mikel had a good game from the first half performance anyway, I think savage has been smoking crack quite possibly
 
Last edited:
zzeezzy said:
Not saying Chelsea were bad, thought the opposition was though.
Click to expand...

Without a doubt they were poor, was a decent hour or so and the game had a friendly type feel to it. Sunday will be tougher but i expect us to have settled to the climate a little better.
 
Rio Ferdinand's racist tweet = 0 game ban and 40k fine
Gareth Barry's using abusive and/or insulting language to an official = 1 game ban and 8k fine
Ashley Cole's tweet slating the FA = 0 game ban and 90k fine
Anton Ferdinand's using abusive and/or insulting language towards JT (proved in a court of law) = Nothing
Obi Mikel's using abusive and/or insulting language towards an official (after he thought he had been racist too) = 3 game ban and 60k fine.

Seriously FA do i need say more?
 
No offense Carl mate but I am seriously tired of talking about all this bs on this thread. Perhaps time to create a new thread?
 
CJACKO11 said:
Rio Ferdinand's racist tweet = 0 game ban and 40k fine
Gareth Barry's using abusive and/or insulting language to an official = 1 game ban and 8k fine
Ashley Cole's tweet slating the FA = 0 game ban and 90k fine
Anton Ferdinand's using abusive and/or insulting language towards JT (proved in a court of law) = Nothing
Obi Mikel's using abusive and/or insulting language towards an official (after he thought he had been racist too) = 3 game ban and 60k fine.



Seriously FA do i need say more?
Click to expand...

View attachment 290588
 
Alcaraz said:
Agreed. What I failed to realize was that all this was an act by Mourinho. Before coming to Madrid, when he saw Barcelona play he knew he was coming up against his most formidable adversary yet.

He knew that the only way he could beat such a team was by unsettling and destroying its foundations which he did with his ludicrious accusations of match-fixing, bribing referee's and favourtism by UEFA against Barcelona.
Click to expand...

All this voodoo nonsense doesn't mean a thing if it doesn't have impact on the trophy cabinet. And as far as that goes, 2 **** seasons out 3, not exactly stellar work, at least not by Madrid's standards. After all they fired Del Bosque after winning the league because he had unfashionable moustache.
 
CJACKO11 said:
Rio Ferdinand's racist tweet = 0 game ban and 40k fine
Gareth Barry's using abusive and/or insulting language to an official = 1 game ban and 8k fine
Ashley Cole's tweet slating the FA = 0 game ban and 90k fine
Anton Ferdinand's using abusive and/or insulting language towards JT (proved in a court of law) = Nothing
Obi Mikel's using abusive and/or insulting language towards an official (after he thought he had been racist too) = 3 game ban and 60k fine.

Seriously FA do i need say more?
Click to expand...

I'm not a liverpool fan but...
Suarez racist abuse = 8 game ban and fine (not sure what it was)
Terry racist abuse = 4 game ban and fine (again not sure what it was)

You have nothing to complain about 4 games is nothing for racist abuse.
 
DarloGeorge96 said:
I'm not a liverpool fan but...
Suarez racist abuse = 8 game ban and fine (not sure what it was)
Terry racist abuse = 4 game ban and fine (again not sure what it was)

You have nothing to complain about 4 games is nothing for racist abuse.
Click to expand...

Terry fined 220k and Suarez fined 40k. Also as you should know Suarez used the word 7 times hence the length of the ban. Also i am not complaining and never said any of the above didn't deserve the bans/fines. Just some consistency.
 
CJACKO11 said:
Terry fined 220k and Suarez fined 40k. Also as you should know Suarez used the word 7 times hence the length of the ban. Also i am not complaining and never said any of the above didn't deserve the bans/fines. Just some consistency.
Click to expand...
Consistency? They do it by a case by case basis, you can't have consistency when everything is all relative and different.
Stop making out like you were hard done by, Suarez 8 game ban is much much worse than 4 for Terry and I can't see how you can have any issue with the Mikel one.
Chasing a ref down the tunnel and into his changing room to then abuse him? yeah smart.
 
CJACKO11 said:
Terry fined 220k and Suarez fined 40k. Also as you should know Suarez used the word 7 times hence the length of the ban. Also i am not complaining and never said any of the above didn't deserve the bans/fines. Just some consistency.
Click to expand...

But Terry earns a **** of a lot more than Suarez and to fine Suarez 220k would be unfair. Dosen't change the fact 4 games for racist abuse is just shamefull. I agree the FA should be more consistent not just will fines/bans but more things as well.
 
TJD07 said:
Consistency? They do it by a case by case basis, you can't have consistency when everything is all relative and different.
Stop making out like you were hard done by, Suarez 8 game ban is much much worse than 4 for Terry and I can't see how you can have any issue with the Mikel one.
Chasing a ref down the tunnel and into his changing room to then abuse him? yeah smart.
Click to expand...

Where did i say they didn't deserve the bans/fines. In fact even in the last thing you quoted by me i stated this exact thing but you obviously decided to over look that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top