The Liverpool Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve*
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 44K
  • Views Views 3M
Its all good, people writing off Liverpool already when he was banned for the first 6 games last season - it's 10 games this season.

Other players will step up, we will also sign players

He'll come back hungrier and continue to be the player he is OR he will move this summer and we'll buy replacements anyway
 
So does this actually mean a ban all football related activities count in any transfer he could possibly be involved in?

And again does this mean he can't do any training with Liverpool as it is football related.
 
LFCMarshall said:
Its all good, people writing off Liverpool already when he was banned for the first 6 games last season - it's 10 games this season.

Other players will step up, we will also sign players

He'll come back hungrier and continue to be the player he is OR he will move this summer and we'll buy replacements anyway
Click to expand...

Optimistic way of looking at it. There's a whole crapload of ifs and buts and uncertainties surrounding this, it's going to have one **** of a negative effect on Liverpool.
 
This won't be the end I reckon it'll get appealed he will keep the 9 match ban and then the 4 month ban will end up being 2 or 3
 
Selling Suarez is one thing though, getting a good quality replacement is another... especially for strikers.
 
GodCubed said:
Optimistic way of looking at it. There's a whole crapload of ifs and buts and uncertainties surrounding this, it's going to have one **** of a negative effect on Liverpool.
Click to expand...

I personally think we'll move on either way - it's nothing new and the heat falls on Suarez more than anything

I am expecting an appeal regardless from Suarez/Uruguay
 
zzeezzy said:
Selling Suarez is one thing though, getting a good quality replacement is another... especially for strikers.
Click to expand...

There is no-one as good as Suarez that Liverpool can realistically buy at the moment, but instead of a direct replacement we strengthen the team instead of one player

We'd all rather have Suarez, but its not a huge problem Liverpool wont solve
 
Oh well, we'll have to rely on Sturridge, Sterling, Coutinho, and Sanchez until November....
 
Joel` said:
Will Barca and Madrid even want to spend £80m on someone who averages being banned for 1/3 of a season, and is shedding sponsors?
Click to expand...

Yet with still one of the best goal/ game ratios in European football.

The genius of the player is worth keeping.. Other English clubs have stuck by controversial characters before so yeah. Will be curious to see how the appeal goes, Uruguay don't have anything to lose by trying!
 
zzeezzy said:
Please don't tell me you're taking the Sanchez as a Liverpool player just off... Phil Thompson >.>
Click to expand...

CJACKO11 said:
Wow, talking about Sanchez as if he's signed. Remember your lot thought that about Salah and Spurs about Willian.
Click to expand...

If it's not Sanchez it will be someone else. Sterling - Coutinho - Sturridge and a new player (Kono, Sanchez, Shaqiri, Lallana)
 
CJACKO11 said:
Wow, talking about Sanchez as if he's signed. Remember your lot thought that about Salah and Spurs about Willian.
Click to expand...

The only sources that Sanchez at anywhere other than Arsenal at the min are the Liverpool Ehco and Phil Thompson.. :)
 
Aannddyy said:
Yet with still one of the best goal/ game ratios in European football.
Click to expand...

Good job they both have the players with THE best goal/game ratios then.

And it's not been said yet whether being banned from football activity will include a transfer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top