ings n milner with benteke on the way lets just take 6th place now
Don't forget Tripier and Bogdanings n milner with benteke on the way lets just take 6th place now
lord help us...Don't forget Tripier and Bogdan![]()
Nothing wrong with Milner.
Ings is a good backup,
nothing confirmed on a bid for Benteke, we won't be getting him trust me.
Why are you so negative? It's not even July yet...
Just seen this on Twitter which I found quite amusing... (And I'm not saying Ings is better than Vietto, just how people will have different perceptions)
Vietto (age 21)
League appearences: 31
goals: 12
HES BOSS HIM.
Ings (age 22)
League appearences: 35
goals: 11
HES ***** HIM
Well yeah, because La Liga is a higher standard of.... Oh wait.
And Vietto was playing for Villarreal (6th) compared to Ings at Burnley (19th)
Wait, I was confirming your point..?
Raheem Sterling is the player with the highest transfer value among the 100 footballers with the greatest transfer probability. He is followed by Alexis Sánchez, Antoine Griezmann, Harry Kane and Philippe Coutinho. Numerous other players with transfer values of over €20 million figure in the list below: Alexandre Lacazette, Gonzalo Higuaín, Miralem Pjanić, Mauro Icardi, Nabil Fekir, José Callejón, Karim Bellarabi, Bernardo Silva, Saido Berahino, Carlos Bacca, Roberto Firmino, Yannick Ferreira Carrasco, Domenico Berardi, Nathan Clyne and Paulo Dybala.
They estimate Sterling's transfer value to be roughly between £55m-£60m.
Just seen this on Twitter which I found quite amusing... (And I'm not saying Ings is better than Vietto, just how people will have different perceptions)
Vietto (age 21)
League appearences: 31
goals: 12
HES BOSS HIM.
Ings (age 22)
League appearences: 35
goals: 11
HES ***** HIM
They also suggest Harry Kane is more valuable than Gareth Bale.
careful marshall, stats are not the be all and end all of football. remember downings stats, created most chances blah blah. stats dont show everything and imo just because one player has better stats then another, doesnt make him better.
careful marshall, stats are not the be all and end all of football. remember downings stats, created most chances blah blah. stats dont show everything and imo just because one player has better stats then another, doesnt make him better.
I agree with Dilakh2,
SOMEONE TAKE A PHOTO!!!
Thats said I don't think Ings will be ****
i get what you mean ings imo will be a good player. i mean he got 10 plus playing for a relegation team. my biggest fear is how will he take the pressure, the fact that he didnt want to take a high stake penalty when his team need thim the most is not a good sign. also his injury record isnt the best. but hey its a free transfer.I put in the original comment I did not think Ings was better because of these stats... I was simply pointing out how people's perceptions of players isn't always accurate
Basically, the negativity from fans already has been embarrassing when a player like Vietto who is supposedly a lot better managed one more goal playing for a better side
Give the lad a chance, the negativity from the fans will only hinder him
"During the last two transfer windows, the correlation measured between transfer fees estimated and those actually paid was greater than 80%. The strength of the correlation shows, on one hand, that the footballers’ market is rational and, on the other, that its rationality is well understood by the statistical model developed by our research team."