Did Gerrard also accidentally stand on Herrera's leg?
The Liverpool Thread
- Thread starter Steve*
- Start date
- Replies 44K
- Views 3M
Did Gerrard also accidentally stand on Herrera's leg?
Was just time wasting tbh.
loool, nani are you okay... are you okay nani. tbh nani is a **** himself, carra shod have sweet chin music nani stupid smug face off.
Was a brilliant clean tackle mate. Right down the ***** leg.
After the final whistle? That's a new one mate.
Would you condone someone breaking all the Liverpool players legs? They all seem like ***** tbh.
After the final whistle I went to the loo. Why would you be watching man in tight shorts that aren't playing football anymore? Something you wanna tell us?
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 5,904
- Reaction score
- 200
- Points
- 63
After watching it several times, I find it a little harsh on Skrtel.
Yes, he probably did it on purpose, however, he doesn't break stride or make a huge change in direction. Unlike Gerrards one, he was running at full pace and De Gea just beat him to it.
Yes, he probably did it on purpose, however, he doesn't break stride or make a huge change in direction. Unlike Gerrards one, he was running at full pace and De Gea just beat him to it.
Theatreof Dreams
Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 11,821
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
He could of easily jumped over De Gea and was never gonna get the ball. I have just watched the whole match and key incidents in the match and that one at least 5 times in the last 10 mins. Defo not harsh on him!
Prime example why you should never hit your kids in the head while they are young.
LFCMarshall
YNWA.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2009
- Messages
- 14,836
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
It was very similar to the Costa 'stamp' on Skrtel in which he did not get banned
Theatreof Dreams
Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 11,821
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
He gonna get banned. Least Costa had the smallest of arguments" I could not see the player, or where my foot was landing". Skrtel has non what so ever!
Theatreof Dreams
Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 11,821
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I just don't get why they've bothered appealing. Three independent referees have already stated they think it's a red card offence, that's the requirement for a charge to be issued. There just isn't any possible mitigation from the video evidence, it's just a waste of everyone's time.
There was obviously "possible mitigation from the video evidence" in Costa's case.
To be honest I think Skrtel did it on purpose, and I won't be surprised if he gets a 3 match ban. But it will still annoy me, because Costa didn't. And honestly I think Costa didn't because FA already banned him for the Can incident, and they very well couldn't give him 6 matches, now could they?
As for arguments in his defence, he could make up any sort of thing. He could use the explanation Rodgers offered, that he was desperately trying to get a knick on the ball as it was the last chance of the game. He could even claim that he simply miscalculated De Gea's speed in comparison with his own.
I think we all know he's gonna get a 3 match ban, I'd be very surprised if he didn't. And not just because I'm convinced he did it on purpose. I think he did it on purpose, I can't possibly know. With Gerrard we can obviously know, regardless of his apologies. The video clearly shows he stamps on Herrera with intent, so the two situations aren't that similar. Costa stamped on Can with intent, and imo it was intentional on Skrtel as well. And that's the reason why I'd be surprised if Skrtel doesn't get banned: If he doesn't, it would prove FA is consistent. And as we all very well know, they're ******* not. Ergo, Skrtel will get banned.
looooooooool good one. ill give you that.
And your a prime example as to why you should
**** off I didnt have coffee yet when I wrote it.
Whoa. Next level burn. Don't address to me again, please. I tried to ignore you as much as I can ( and I did good job). Don't start another fight you'll lose.