I wouldn't go as far as saying "Can can't defend", that statement is just plain wrong. Sure, he's not a centreback, but he was actually one of our best in the back 3 last season. Not to mention the lack of quality we have in that department: Sakho is by far our best, Skrtel is only second because of his attitude and passion, and I'd say Can is better than Lovren. Forget Toure.
Personally I'd prefer us playing with a back 4, with Sakho and Skrtel as centrebacks. If any of those are out injured, I'd honestly be more nervous about Lovren or Toure than Can. But I guess that's just me.
I get that his passing ability as a centrehalf is useful but just like last season he is targeted by other teams, Its just square pegs in round holes tbh. You want your centrehalf to be able to defend and well Can isnt a cb. Football is a simple game made complicated by fools, in this case the fools rodgers.
If you're going on form, Can shouldn't be anywhere near the side. He's been constantly out of position all season and making terrible decisions. (He should of gifted Gestede a goal yesterday. Thankfully he screwed it up even worse.). Until he learns to be tactically disciplined (which is bizarre in itself being he's German), he's a serious liability wherever you play him.
I'd much rather of he or the very surprising Gomez (what's he done wrong BTW? WELL arguably our most solid defender this season. He has one poor game against West Ham and he's suddenly demoted) been at the top of the group along with Sakho this year.
Moreno has been added in to provide a better attacking threat - which he has... Harsh on Gomez, mind.
Completely harsh. Even more so when you go to three centre backs and can't find a place for him there. His natural position.
Moreno would be better served ahead of him and just allowed to attack with the security of Gomez defensively behind him if he wanted more of an attacking threat wide for me. Instead he goes to a back 3/ 5 to fit him in as a wing back.
Which is completely the correct decision .....
Dude can't defend properly but is an attacking threat. Why not play him as a winger without any defensive responsibility? Same thing happened with Johnson.
It seemed to work at a very successful Sevilla side
Dude can't defend properly but is an attacking threat. Why not play him as a winger without any defensive responsibility? Same thing happened with Johnson.
Just because full back is good attacking doesn't mean he will be good winger. There are lot of variables to be considered, biggest of them all is overlapping runs and having space infront of them to run into.
It doesn't but I'd sure as heck rather try a full back that can't defend/ is very weak defensively, but is decent going forward, as a winger/ wide midfielder with defensive cover behind him so he doesn't have to worry about that aspect of his game.
To keep exposing yourself repeatedly defensively with that type of player, like we've done for years with successive full backs that couldn't defend; is the definition of madness.
You can just bench him and play proper winger.
Outside of Ibe who's lacking confidence we don't have one.
Sign Benteke. Want to play with width. Don't carry any natural wingers.
The man is ahead of his time I tell yer'!