The Manchester United Thread

He said that "City will never be Manchester United". Dunno if that was in that article. He seems to think City want to be them.

Which is not true. Did he say City wont be the dominant force in football? I think he said that they will never be as succesfull and have Uniteds history. But actually, they can...who knows if this world last 50+ years. City could overtake them in terms of trophies won.

You want to be Manchester United just like Chelsea, L'pool, Arsenal wants to be United, a dominant force in English football. Not United as United, but the best club in EPL.
 
I'm not interested in Barca, but I am interested in bringing back the swagger of 2006-2009, and for that we need genuine magic. Barca is relevant because that is SAF's new goal in this team rebuild

One of the reason why we beat Barca back then was because of our defense. Rio, Vida, Brown, VDS, Evra were amazing that season. IMO to beat Barca just one CM signing is not enough.
 
Sir Alex Ferguson has revealed that Carlos Tevez wasn't signed by Manchester United on a permanent deal because he said he was going to quit football in four years' time.

Tevez was at Old Trafford for two years on loan, but United chose not to take up the option to keep him and he joined rivals Manchester City. Since then, the Argentine has gone on to become one of the best players in the Premier League, leading many to question Ferguson's wisdom over the decision to let him go.

However, the canny Scot has revealed his reasons for turning down Tevez, claiming that it would not have been a worthwhile long-term investment.

"Tevez told us he was only going to play for four more years," Ferguson said. "If we had signed him on a five-year contract knowing that he was going to quit in four, there would have been no re-sale value for us."

With the £45 million-rated Tevez keen to quit City to return to South America to be nearer his family, Ferguson also revealed where he though the striker's future lies, despite recent interest from Italian side Inter Milan.

"I'm not sure Inter would pay £45 million, especially after he's said he wants to go back to Argentina to see his kids. I can see him staying at City," he added.
Sir Alex Ferguson knew Carlos Tevez problems were on the horizon at Manchester City | Football News | ESPN.co.uk
 
Last edited:
And thats why SAF >>>> you. Espeically since he hit form for the last two and half months of the season, and looked like his old self, one of the few players to actually acquit himself well against Barcelona

I should hope that someone 50 years my senior with all that footballing experience would be ">>>'' me.

Carrick didn't hit form. He played well in some games, notably Schalke & Chelsea in Europe...and underwhelming in the next game. He did better than last time against Barca, but it still weren't good enough. It was a poor season for him and I don't think he'll ever return to his pre-Rome form. You may be happy with mediocrity but I'm not, and I'd like to think that most of my fellow Reds & more importantly, Sir Alex; are a little more ambitious.
 
I should hope that someone 50 years my senior with all that footballing experience would be ">>>'' me.

Carrick didn't hit form. He played well in some games, notably Schalke & Chelsea in Europe...and underwhelming in the next game. He did better than last time against Barca, but it still weren't good enough. It was a poor season for him and I don't think he'll ever return to his pre-Rome form. You may be happy with mediocrity but I'm not, and I'd like to think that most of my fellow Reds & more importantly, Sir Alex; are a little more ambitious.

Where did i say i was happy with mediocrity? Read my posts, dont make up stuff that i havent said, and dont put words in my mouth, really annoys me. You cant see the future so you have no idea what form he will return to. he was the best midfielder against barca, yet i dont see you chewing anyone else out. Sunilvk7 put up a very good article on him, suggest you do some research and actually read it

SAF is ambitious, and yet extended his deal, that tells you how important he thinks he is.


next....
 
Last edited:
And for the record ive not been a big fan of carrick for the last year or so, and i constantly criticised his place in the side for the 1st half of the season (as sunilvk etc will tell) and didnt think he get any form and felt he possibly should be sold in summer. Big enough to concede that he proved me wrong with a good return to form in the last 2 months and with some very strong individual peformances.
 
And for the record ive not been a big fan of carrick for the last year or so, and i constantly criticised his place in the side for the 1st half of the season (as sunilvk etc will tell) and didnt think he get any form and felt he possibly should be sold in summer. Big enough to concede that he proved me wrong with a good return to form in the last 2 months and with some very strong individual peformances.

Yeah remember that Convo.. Shame that many don't admit they were proved wrong.

When a manager like Fergie who thrives on winning trophies says Carrick is important player why don't fans accept that and try to understand his role. Carrick was far better than Fletcher but I haven't seen many criticizing Fletcher last season. Carrick has become scape goat like Berba. And also Anderson plays well with Carrick and same vice versa..


Patrice Evra urges Arsenal's Samir Nasri to reject Manchester City and join Manchester United

Patrice Evra has revealed his attempts to persuade Samir Nasri to reject Manchester City in favour of Manchester United and claimed that the Arsenal midfielder has talked of the “privilege” of being offered a move to Old Trafford.

Although United lodged a £20 million bid for Nasri last month, manager Sir Alex Ferguson fears the 24 year-old favours a move to the Etihad Stadium with Manchester City prepared to outbid United, both in wages and transfer fee, in order to sign the Frenchman from Arsenal.

But with Nasri’s future unresolved due to Arsène Wenger’s attempts to hand the player a new contract to replace the final 12 months of his current deal - an offer so far rejected by Nasri - Evra has urged his France team-mate to put glory first.



“Of course I would like to see Samir at United,” Evra said. “I’ve talked a lot with him during the holiday and told him how great it is to play for Manchester United and how important it would be for him to become one of the biggest players in the world.



“He said that it’s a privilege that a club like Man United want him, but that he has to think about his future and talk with his agent. I’m not Nasri, I’m not his agent or his dad, but I would definitely tell him to come to Man United. Definitely.



“I remember I made that little joke saying that he’s a prince now, but if he wants to be the king then he has to join Man United. But that’s the reality and I’ve told him that. I said: ‘If you want to win trophies you have to come here.’ In five years I’ve won 12 trophies, and I don’t know if I’d have won more with another club.


“I just told him the truth. If he goes to City, it’s his choice, but I know, as a player, if I have Manchester United and Manchester City, I would go straightaway for United.


“It’s a lot of things. It can be for the money, many different things. But I would prefer to go for the glory. I don’t know how negotiations are at the moment, but he has a lot of clubs [interested in him] and he has to think.
“But we will have a nice welcome [at United] and I can help as well because I’m French, but I don’t know what he’s going to do.”


While Evra’s attempts to thwart City’s move for Nasri could prove futile, the 30 year-old claims he is not surprised that former United team-mate and close friend Carlos Tévez wants to leave City.


“Two or three years ago he [Tévez] told me: ‘Pat, maybe one day I’ll be back in South America.’
“I said: ‘Carlito, you’re young.’ But he said: ‘Yeah, but I’ve won everything. I want to go back closer to my family and play in my country.’


“Now I know he wasn’t lying and he is doing what he told me three years ago, and I’m not surprised at all.
“I’m very close to Carlito and even when he was playing for United when he was 23 or 24, he told me that another two years in the UK and he would be back in Argentina.


“I was surprised, but when he told me that he’d won everything I didn’t have anything to say to him.”


Following the retirement of Paul Scholes, Gary Neville and Edwin van der Sar at the end of last season, Evra now finds himself a senior figure within Ferguson’s squad, who arrived in New York on Sunday and will face the MLS All-Stars on Wednesday.


But Evra admits he was determined to leave Old Trafford 12 months ago before Ferguson’s attempt to change his mind.
Evra said: “Sometimes you have to make a choice in your life and there was an approach from two big clubs, Inter Milan and Real Madrid, and I just had a chat about it with the boss.


“After the World Cup, I’d told him that I wanted to go, but when I went to his house we talked a lot and in the end he didn’t have to persuade me to stay because my heart wanted to stay.


“He just said: ‘Pat, it’s the greatest news you want to stay because United are the biggest club in the world and you have a lot of respect here for myself, your team-mates, the fans. I don’t know why you want to move to another club. But I think you’ve made the right choice to stay here.’


“I’m very close to Sir Alex and have a lot of respect for him, and a lot of respect for myself. It wasn’t anything incredible, it was just normal. The boss has to be the boss, but he also has to look like he’s the dad of every player.
“In the end I made the right choice and I’m so happy to still be a Man United player. It was an easy decision because, if I was honest with myself, I knew I wanted to stay at this club achieve more.”
 
Last edited:
Where did i say i was happy with mediocrity? Read my posts, dont make up stuff that i havent said, and dont put words in my mouth, really annoys me. You cant see the future so you have no idea what form he will return to. he was the best midfielder against barca, yet i dont see you chewing anyone else out. Sunilvk7 put up a very good article on him, suggest you do some research and actually read it

SAF is ambitious, and yet extended his deal, that tells you how important he thinks he is.


next....

I said you "may'' be happy with mediocrity...

No, I can't see the future. But at his age and judging his form post-Rome, I'm entitled to believe he won't return to his best form.

I don't need to "chew anyone else out''. Giggs and Valencia were the poorer players on the night, but overall they weren't as poor as Carrick last season, and that's what this is about; not just the game against Barca.

No, it doesn't tell me how important he thinks he is. He gave Owen a new contract, he gave O'shea one too and then sold him...he could've extended Carricks deal to up the asking price for all you know.

next...
 
I said you "may'' be happy with mediocrity...

No, I can't see the future. But at his age and judging his form post-Rome, I'm entitled to believe he won't return to his best form.

I don't need to "chew anyone else out''. Giggs and Valencia were the poorer players on the night, but overall they weren't as poor as Carrick last season, and that's what this is about; not just the game against Barca.

No, it doesn't tell me how important he thinks he is. He gave Owen a new contract, he gave O'shea one too and then sold him...he could've extended Carricks deal to up the asking price for all you know.

next...

You said he may be happy with mediocrity but you're not, that's very different to saying "may or not be".

Good job you didn't decide to judge Rooney in that way for the first half of the season?

Carrick has a job to do, and he does it excellently while getting on with it quietly. It's probably no wonder he loses confidence and form when 90% of the fans hate him because he doesn't ping them in from 30 yards out every other game.

Next?
 
I said you "may'' be happy with mediocrity...

No, I can't see the future. But at his age and judging his form post-Rome, I'm entitled to believe he won't return to his best form.

I don't need to "chew anyone else out''. Giggs and Valencia were the poorer players on the night, but overall they weren't as poor as Carrick last season, and that's what this is about; not just the game against Barca.

No, it doesn't tell me how important he thinks he is. He gave Owen a new contract, he gave O'shea one too and then sold him...he could've extended Carricks deal to up the asking price for all you know.

next...

1) what age got do with anything? its not going to stop him returning to form. You keep talking about post Rome whil completely ignoring the fact that he has been on form for the last 2.5 months, which actually suggests a return to form

2) Carrick has been better than fletcher this season, yet dont see you berating him

3) SAF actually said he feels Carrick is very important and it was the reasoning behind the offer
 
You said he may be happy with mediocrity but you're not, that's very different to saying "may or not be".

Not really...

Good job you didn't decide to judge Rooney in that way for the first half of the season?

Well no, Rooney is world class :S He's bounced back from the off-the-pitch trouble and injuries before, and I fully expected him to get back to his form.

Carrick has a job to do, and he does it excellently while getting on with it quietly. It's probably no wonder he loses confidence and form when 90% of the fans hate him because he doesn't ping them in from 30 yards out every other game.

He lost confidence because his performance in Rome was probably the worst he's ever had. The semi-final against Man City was the final straw for me, wouldn't say I hate him though.

1) what age got do with anything? its not going to stop him returning to form. You keep talking about post Rome whil completely ignoring the fact that he has been on form for the last 2.5 months, which actually suggests a return to form

It's not fact though. I addressed what you said, so perhaps it's you that's being ignorant?

2) Carrick has been better than fletcher this season, yet dont see you berating him

It's easy to forget a man that's hardly played this year, if you want me to berate him though I suppose I can.

3) SAF actually said he feels Carrick is very important and it was the reasoning behind the offer

SAF could be lying like he is with the "no more transfers'' story...remember?
 
1) Yes it is, there's a major grammatical difference.
2) Why does how good a player is define how consistent his form will be? Ibrahimovic is a much more accomplished player than Parker, yet Parker is much more able to keep his form consistent. If you believe Rooney can bounce back to form, then if you were being non-biased you'd say the same for Carrick.
3) 2 bad games? He was excellent for us in the final parts of the season, which is quite blatantly a return to form, which counters all your arguments.
4) It is fact, because, he well returned to form.
5) How do you know he's lying about the no transfers thing? So you assume he's lying because you want more transfers, then you assume he's lying because it suits your argument? Hardly a strong basis for anything. Many of the United players came out and said Carrick is vital to the team, and even though he does his job quietly - it's vital what he does. SAF nor the team have any reason to go to the press and lie about it. Go read Sunil's article on him and educate yourself. :)
 
Last edited:
"The player I want isn't available at the moment. I don't see us making any more additions." - SAF.

Seems Sneijder deal has changed and we won't be getting him after all. Seems he was telling the truth after all.
 
"The player I want isn't available at the moment. I don't see us making any more additions." - SAF.

Seems Sneijder deal has changed and we won't be getting him after all. Seems he was telling the truth after all.

"I'm not interested at all" to "it's difficult" to "We are not looking atm" to "Player isn't available atm"

No one can tell whether or not SAF is telling the truth.
 
United ended their short stay in Scotland with a second victory in a matter of days, courtesy of Oliver Norwood's second-half winner.

The talented Northern Ireland international midfielder struck on 54 minutes, curling home a square pass by Paul Pogba from five yards outside the box. It was a spectacular strike worthy of winning any game and provided further evidence of this team's ability to bag goals from distance.

Warren Joyce's side played some nice football that drew applause from the appreciative home fans with Pogba particularly impressive. The young Frenchman shone in midfield and one move that also involved Darren Gibson and Danny Drinkwater clearly thrilled the Somerset Park faithful.

Gibson hammered a 30-yarder well wide while Michael Keane and Davide Petrucci were also off target with first-half efforts. Just before the interval, Pogba and Gibson's approach work carved out a great opening for Will Keane but home keeper Kevin Cuthbert was equal to the striker's shot.

Jesse Lingard, fresh from his hat-trick at Spartans on Sunday, almost doubled the lead soon after coming on as a substitute but his shot whizzed inches wide. Pogba deservedly picked up the sponsors' man of the match award but Cuthbert's display was also acknowledged and striker Michael Moffat deserves a mention for keeping the Reds' defenders busy.

United's second string move on to Tranmere for their next outing on Wednesday night.

United: Kuszczak; M.Keane, McGinty, Thorpe (Cole 15, Giverin 88), Fryers; Norwood, Drinkwater, Pogba, Gibson (Lonsdale 90), Petrucci (Lingard 52); W.Keane (Fornasier 75). Unused subs: Jacob, Cofie, Leao.

Talk is that Drinkwater was excellent (Played well in all 3 games, Well I have to say played superbly well as per reports) and Pogba got MOTM (Impressed in all the games).

And Asusual Gibson was awful and ****. I dont see him doing any good for us as he can't even play well with kids. I guess there goes my slightest of hope that he may become squad player for us..



Are United trying to cut the wage bill?
It pays not to believe anything Sir Alex Ferguson says about potential transfers. This is not a man who loves sharing secrets with the media. So we should all take his comments in the US yesterday with a pinch (or perhaps a bucket) of salt. Having said that, Fergie said some quite specific things about the financial implications of the club's summer sales and purchases which are worth a closer look at. This is what he said (my emphasis):
"At this moment, I can't see another addition. The type of player we might have been looking for is not available.
"We lost five players in their 30s this summer. That helped finance the three younger players I have brought to the club. I am happy with the players I have got at this moment in time."
The "five players in their 30s" are presumably Wes Brown, John O'Shea, Owen Hargreaves, Gary Neville and Paul Scholes. In addition of course, one rather important player in his forties, Edwin van der Sar, has also left the club.


Of these six departures, only Wes and JOS were sold for a fee, so presumably when talking about exits helping to "finance" new arrivals, Fergie is talking about wages. The question therefore is how much has been saved in wages?


Needless to say, we are entering a world of guesswork when it comes to players' salaries. These are my best guesses, but if anyone can find sensible sources for more accurate figures, please let me know.

Summer+2011+deals.png


On these figures (and indeed on anything roughly near them), the club is currently sitting on some significant cost savings. The estimated £10.7m per annum in annual wage savings is 8% of the total club wage bill in 2009/10 and around 11% of the club's annual cash profits (EBITDA).


The estimated saving of c. £200k per week is also (coincidentally?) around the level that the press has speculated United would have to pay Wesley Sneijder to prise him from Internazionale.


So what is going on here? The cash for transfer spending is definitely available. As I wrote in June, when the club publishes it's full year results in October, they will show a cash balance of c. £180m at 30th June 2010. Only around £47m of this has been spent. There is over £130m still available.


The club is clearly crying out for more creativity in central midfield. Scholsey made sixteen league appearances last season and has gone, Gibson is for sale, isn't good enough and hasn't travelled on the US tour, Fletcher is still ill, Giggsy is a stand-in midfielder entering the end of his career. Meanwhile, Barcelona passed through us and around us at Wembley in a way that makes the need to strengthen crystal clear.


I don't know why Fergie said what he said yesterday. I hope it is more smoke and mirrors to keep the rest of the world confused. I hope it isn't a sign that not only do new signings need "financing" by player exits, but that the edict has gone out to reduce the wage bill. Is the subject of dividends to the Glazer family back on the agenda? Is this an attempt to boost short-term profits for a Hong Kong float (at the cost of the long-term development of the club)?


Frankly, what's the point of being the most commercially successful club in England with a "global fan base" of 330 million and £130m+ still in the bank if we can't afford a decent new central midfielder?


Good old Glazernomics.


LUHG

http://andersred.blogspot.com/2011/07/are-united-trying-to-cut-wage-bill.html

 
Last edited:
Vucinic linked to United

"The meeting with the leaders of Manchester United
spacer.gif
was yesterday," Lucci told lasignoraingiallorosso.it.
"It has only been a chat, in which no offers have been made nor was there an agreement sorted.
"The English club, however, really like Vucinic, but to see him with the shirt of the Red Devils, there is still work to do."
 
If SAF is telling the truth, i'm surprised. I honestly think that they need to sign a central midfielder.
 
Back
Top