The Premier League Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve*
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 10K
  • Views Views 1M
Legend Incredible said:
Orny, Orny, this isn’t good news at all. It means we’re not getting Pavard.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1691511518825725952
Click to expand...
Tbh we don’t need him if slab head is staying and it’s true both our rb are signing new contracts. It’s not a priority for me. Another DM is. If reports from Germany are true about Pavard only wanting Utd and ETH we can try again in Jan or at least get him to sign a pre contract with us for next summer in Jan as he will be allowed due to him being out of contract.
 
F joke how the Ev righrly get punished with a penalty for more or leas the same thing the Utd ‘keeper did against Wolves that went unpunished.

Throw a bunch of other incidents the first 2 games, and officiating is as inconsistently poor as ever.
 
Scouseinthehouse said:
F joke how the Ev righrly get punished with a penalty for more or leas the same thing the Utd ‘keeper did against Wolves that went unpunished.

Throw a bunch of other incidents the first 2 games, and officiating is as inconsistently poor as ever.
Click to expand...
They made up for that yesterday with the clear Romero handball not given so all is forgiven, amirite?
 
Legend Incredible said:
They made up for that yesterday with the clear Romero handball not given so all is forgiven, amirite?
Click to expand...

That would be on of the 'other' incidents. It's a continued joke.

The penalty and red card at Fulham, and Mac Allister straight red at Anfield just added to the incompetence on display on yet another highly embarrassing weekend of armature officiating.
 
Boo! Boo! ******* BOOOOOOO!!!!!

1692541419012.png
 
Even Gerrard won’t touch Greenwood and he has F all principles.

‘Da **** was Arnold and co thinking even considering taking him back?
 
Scouseinthehouse said:
Even Gerrard won’t touch Greenwood and he has F all principles.

‘Da **** was Arnold and co thinking even considering taking him back?
Click to expand...
Well their statement clearly says after further investigation and evidence he was found not to have done what he was charged with 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
Theatre of Dreams83 said:
Well their statement clearly says after further investigation and evidence he was found not to have done what he was charged with 🤷🏻‍♂️
Click to expand...

That open letter from Arnold was proper cringe and never once addressed the multiple-times the low life woman hating **** (seemed kinder than calling him out for what everyone knows he is in reality. An abusive rapist), broke his bail which directly lead to the case being compromised and ultimately collapsing.

Him acting as judge and jury in clearing him carries little weight.

I'm glad for the reputation of Utd the right decision was made. Albeit through fan pressure. But the very fact that decision wasn't taken months back, is a shockingly bad indictment on those within the hierarchy at the club, and the manager, who all unbelievably tried to facilitate his return to the team.

Heads should roll for that as they've completely compromised Utd's name and integrity and then some.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top