I'm sorry but these polls never work because there is soo many players to choose from already you have offended me by not placing George Best or Eric Cantona in the list or placing Paul Scholes in it. But from the list you picked I would have to say... You know what only Zidane really have a decent claim to be on that list. Pele was nothing compared to Zico to be honest both played at the same time only Pele was more successful in terms publicity wise. Bergkamp [spelling] was a better player I would say than Henry in the same team. Kaka is amateur at best he shows up and dissappears. My personal favourite player was Cantona for his gracefulness and flair on the field. He done things that players these days can only dream of. Also Terry Butcher was a fantastic defender. George Best if it wasn't for the Alcohol would be far more bigger than Pele and any other player to retire.
Ridiculous. When you say that Kaka is amateur at best, it kinda ruins anything else you said there.
just unfortunately sat around doing **** all after world cup and got fat
---------- Post added at 09:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:15 AM ----------
just on the basis on tht i hve seen a lot of him i would have to go 4 henry
but ronaldo has the potential to be there with the greats
same 4 messi, kaka i really dont think so
as 4 henrik larsson u are having a laugh great player but not at tht level
how the **** if he is in there tht gerrard lampard torres people like tht are not in it
wht bout puskas?
I don't know, I will concede that Messi is a better talent than Kaka, but there is one thing that distinguishes the three and puts Kaka above CR and Messi in my book. CR and Messi has never single-handedly carried a team to Champions League victory. Kaka did just that in 2007. Just as 1986 World Cup was the Maradona show, the 2007 Champions League was the Kaka show. Kaka had support cameos from the rest of the Milan team, but it was all Kaka.
It wasn't the same with CR and Messi. Lord knows, CR had the joy of having the likes of Wayne Rooney, Tevez, Ferdinand and van der Sar among others, while Messi has the likes of Iniesta, Xavi, and Samuel Eto'o, among others. Sure, there was the winning midfield trio Gattuso-Pirlo-Seedorf, as well as the veterans Maldini and Inzaghi, but they were pretty much past their best. If Kaka didn't play all the Champions League matches, Milan might not have won the trophy. If say Kaka was injured and didn't play against Celtic, there is some chance that Milan will lose. And Milan will definitely lose if Kaka didn't play against Man Utd and Liverpool.
It wasn't the same with CR and Messi. Without CR, Man Utd still probably would've taken the win over Lyon and Roma. And without Messi, Barca will probably would've taken the win over Lyon and Bayern. Both CR and Messi are the lead actors in their team's glory, but their roles in their clubs weren't as talismanic or inspiring as Kaka. Without a doubt, Kaka single-handedly won the 2007 Champions League trophy for Milan.
That IMO puts Kaka above CR and Messi.
Also, as good as Steven Gerrard is, IMO too many people are overrating him.