Cheers mate.
Yeah I am mostly conceding on counters, will remove those instructions in tough games from now on. Let's see if that makes the difference.
Although the tactic is very attacking ( as it may seem to you from first view), it has done well for me in Home games even against stronger teams.
But the problem starts in hard away games against stronger teams where I am torn apart in defence.
Suggest me what changes I could make to existing...
I have created a counter attacking tactic to use it in away games against stronger opponents or in later stages of the game.
I am not that much of a tactical expert. So please let me know any "OBVIOUS" mistake I might have made.
Please also suggest any tweaks that you would make in this...
Although my Liverpool side does great in terms of attack, but too shaky in defence.
Any help is appreciated.
Cheers.
This is my tactic: (Attacking/Fluid)
Player Instructions:
GK: Distribute to FB's, Roll it out.
FullBacks: Shoot less often, close down more, stay wide, pass it...
Although my Liverpool side does great in terms of attack, but too shaky in defence.
Any help is appreciated.
Cheers.
This is my tactic: (Attacking/Fluid)
Player Instructions:
GK: Distribute to FB's, Roll it out.
FullBacks: Shoot less often, close down more, stay wide, pass...
Here are my three questions regarding philosphy.
Q1) What are the main criterias that you consider when choosing the philosophy for your tactic?
Q2) Does it depend on your tactic or your tactic depends upon the philosophy?
Q3) To what extent does a philosophy affects a tactic?