Summed it up in one sentence.Arsenal are bad defensively BECAUSE of their attacking philosophy. You seemed to suggest in the first post that they are seperate reasons when they are one in the same.
Arsenal are bad defensively BECAUSE of their attacking philosophy. You seemed to suggest in the first post that they are seperate reasons when they are one in the same.
I'm hoping Wenger does sign new player(s) in January.
Arsenal have around £50M to spend don't they.?
I think if they do buy player they should buy a striker who will get 20+ goals a season i think that is what arsenal are missing, maybe that is just me who thinks that ?
We do need a defensive mid but as someone said theres not many world class defensive midfielders that would go to arsenal atm if i could take gilberto silva or flamini back then 100% i would.
stupid decisions are our downfall tbh.
We don't need a Striker who scors 20+ a season if we keep playing like we have been, 6 goals against Blackburn with all different scorers? As long as goals come, I don't care who scores them.
To be fair I wouldn't mind one, just like Henry used to be. But that isn't the most important thing on the agenda for the club.
Yeah if you could get a player like henry that would be super for you
There is no player like Henry though![]()
What about...the best way to defend is to keep possesion when leading 1-0 and pick off your opponents by keeping passing and passing and just wait for the right moment to strike when your opposition are half asleep? just what barcelona did to man utd last season in champions league final?
would that work for arsenal? lol