Which role in this corner setup would you advice to put striker on to score some goals?

The thing is that the guy that stays outside the box shouldn't take the corners because if he takes the corner then there's no player outside the box and that would be very bad and that's why I chose STC position to say outside the box because very often players for this position don't have high "Corners" attribute and they don't take the corners...

STC/MC/ML/AMR these positions may stay outside the box but you should take into consideration who are your corner takers...

Btw, that's why I chose STC position to stay outside and not because of Messi ;)





******

THE TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED


CHANGES:

- tweaked the team's width.

- tweaked the throw-ins setup.


bump
 
I tweaked Cavani/Giroud to challenge keeper, Ramsey to attack far post, OX/Walcott (AMR) to be outside box and Ozil/Cazorla to take corner, have I done it right or I'm wrong?

yup, that's fine... also you can make your DM to attack far post and make MC position to Go Forward or take the corners or stay outside the box if you want to...
 
yup, that's fine... also you can make your DM to attack far post and make MC position to Go Forward or take the corners or stay outside the box if you want to...

Which of atack far post / go forward / attack keeper has the most chance of headed goal and which footed goal?
 
Brazil; I have taken vengence upon Germany on your behalf.

23711d892f68778e817fa86afe02afa5.png


Crusher v1, didn't select my team, I am managing Milan + Italy so it's international time is sometimes annoying so assistant selected team, I just watched Germany be crushed by my Italian team.
 
Which of atack far post / go forward / attack keeper has the most chance of headed goal and which footed goal?

The positions that have "Go Forward" instruction don't make any head challenges during corners... they have different purpose and they can only score from foot(of course, all that is true only for the delivery method that this tactic has).

The only positions that do head challenges are those that have "Stand On Posts", "Challenge Keeper" and "Attack Far Post" instructions.
 
Last edited:
The positions that have "Go Forward" instruction don't make any head challenges during corners... they have different purpose and they can only score from foot.

The only positions that do head challenges are those that have "Stand On Posts", "Challenge Keeper" and "Attack Far Post" instructions.

Ok then I got it wrong cuz i thought Attack Far Post was about tap-in by foot someones header thats why I put Ramsey there. Thank you very much for info. So now last question - Challenge Keeper or Attack Far Post is more dangerous to score goal from and should be used by better header/taller player?
 
I really don't understand how people are getting wonderful results with this.

On FM15 I have had wonderful success with TFF's tactics. But on FM16 I have suffered loss after loss after loss with Liverpool, and that's including brilliant players that fit the filters in each positions. No reason why.

Does anyone know why this is happening? I haven't had this kind of trouble on FM since FM10!

I tested this tactic on my FM Touch save, which I use to test tactics. Does FM Touch have a differing match engine or something? Because I find full fledged FM to be much easier to get good results.
 
Last edited:
So now last question - Challenge Keeper or Attack Far Post is more dangerous to score goal from and should be used by better header/taller player?

I wouldn't say that because I find it's pretty random... all 4 positions("2 at the posts", "Challenge Keeper" and "Attack Far Post") have more or less equal chances to get the ball…
 
This tactic makes watching slugs have *** seem exciting for me. As Liverpool I've sat back and watched my first 3 games that I should be winning with ease, play out with not a single highlight ending in nil nil draws. I literally watched the clock count to 90 minutes and all of my players got ratings between 6.3 and 6.7 and no chances were made.

The games were against Watford at home, Villa at home and Leicester away.

Have you actually tested these tactics TFF? Can you post some actual results please?

I think you should consider changing the name of this tactic to "Fallout 4" because at the moment it's as disappointing as that game was for me.
 
Very constructive crew2.

Having a sulk because you're too lazy to create your own tactic and using someone else's hasn't worked out for you.

We're still in the early stages of FM so it's understandable that tactics are still in need of tweaking, TFF has a record of producing quality tactics, he knows what he's doing and is kind enough to share it with us for our enjoyment.

Stick to watching slugs have *** if you're going to get emo over a few bad results.
 
I really don't understand how people are getting wonderful results with this.

On FM15 I have had wonderful success with TFF's tactics. But on FM16 I have suffered loss after loss after loss with Liverpool, and that's including brilliant players that fit the filters in each positions. No reason why.

Does anyone know why this is happening? I haven't had this kind of trouble on FM since FM10!

I tested this tactic on my FM Touch save, which I use to test tactics. Does FM Touch have a differing match engine or something? Because I find full fledged FM to be much easier to get good results.

I'm in the same position.

I thought I would try it as Liverpool and haven't made any signings because all the players seem to fit it quite well. It's been garbage for me so far compared to last years amazing tactics from TFF.
 
Very constructive crew2.

Having a sulk because you're too lazy to create your own tactic and using someone else's hasn't worked out for you.

We're still in the early stages of FM so it's understandable that tactics are still in need of tweaking, TFF has a record of producing quality tactics, he knows what he's doing and is kind enough to share it with us for our enjoyment.

Stick to watching slugs have *** if you're going to get emo over a few bad results.

http://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/53471568.jpg
 
tff, would it be fair to say the winger it's more important that they are just a pacey player to dribble the flanks and whip some crosses/passes in, and the wide mid is more crucial to have better technical stats as they would get more scoring opportunities than the winger?

example, if you had salah and iturbe, iturbe would be the winger and salah the wide mid, as salah is better technically/mentally
 
training as Complete Wing Back and playing as Full Back Support?...Is this a mistake?
 
******

THE TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED


CHANGES:

- tweaked the dribbling settings of AMCL/ML/DCL/DCR positions.

- tweaked the crossing settings of ML position.

- tweaked the attacking corner setup.

- tweaked the throw-ins setup.




tff, would it be fair to say the winger it's more important that they are just a pacey player to dribble the flanks and whip some crosses/passes in, and the wide mid is more crucial to have better technical stats as they would get more scoring opportunities than the winger?

example, if you had salah and iturbe, iturbe would be the winger and salah the wide mid, as salah is better technically/mentally

I'd say that Winger also needs Technique attribute as high as possible because it happens very often that he needs to make very complicated passes during matches in order to get away from defenders’ pressure and such passes require high level of Technique. Also, in order to make a cross under pressure in requires a high level of Technique.


training as Complete Wing Back and playing as Full Back Support?...Is this a mistake?

No, it isn't a mistake. :)
 
******

THE TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED


CHANGES:

- tweaked the dribbling settings of AMCL/ML/DCL/DCR positions.

- tweaked the crossing settings of ML position.

- tweaked the attacking corner setup.

- tweaked the throw-ins setup.






I'd say that Winger also needs Technique attribute as high as possible because it happens very often that he needs to make very complicated passes during matches in order to get away from defenders’ pressure and such passes require high level of Technique. Also, in order to make a cross under pressure in requires a high level of Technique.




No, it isn't a mistake. :)


But should they train as DL/R - Complete wing back or as WBL/R - Complete wing back? (I dont know if it evens makes any difference between the two options...:P
 
Back
Top