Johnson is primarily a left-winger, which is why I left him out by choosing Bale ahead of him.
Indeed he does, but I'd still favour a natural right-footed player ahead of him.
If he becomes the next Robben, I might eat my words.
No way will he be the next Robben, Johnson can use both feet with significant ease
. Robben despite his dribbling, is as one footed as they come.
King is better than Dawson, and definitely better than Vermaelen.
Bale's 2010 was superb. His 2009 wasn't great, but he was still trying to force his way back into the team ahead of Assou-Ekotto at LB and Modric at LW. When he managed to get back in, he quickly became our most valuable player for the close of the season.
Thanks for the good ratings I guess, but I'm more interested in your choices. Post them up.![]()
Sorry if this is cheeky but please tell me you where joking when you said King is better than Vermaelan "/ Cause Vermaelen destroys him everyday lol
lmao. Vermaelen is fairly slow and clumsy.
Lets see Vermaelen do it consistently for 10 years.
http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/04/09/thomas-vermaelen-arsenal-positional-errors/
To summarize: King > Vermaelen. End of.
lmao. Vermaelen is fairly slow and clumsy.
Lets see Vermaelen do it consistently for 10 years.
http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/04/09/thomas-vermaelen-arsenal-positional-errors/
To summarize: King > Vermaelen. End of.
lmao. Vermaelen is fairly slow and clumsy.
Lets see Vermaelen do it consistently for 10 years.
http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/04/09/thomas-vermaelen-arsenal-positional-errors/
To summarize: King > Vermaelen. End of.
alecwkd....im not having a go at you mate but you would say that IMHO they have different strengths. vermaelan (sp)is better technically said:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
King is a much better centre half all round really, reads the game much better, is far more experienced, and is still fairly good technically for a centre back. But i feel that centre backs should defend first, attack second.
can consistent and king even be mentioned in the same sentance?
Whenever King plays he always plays good, i've hardly ever seen him play a bad game, he could be injured for 6 months and then come back and play brilliantly. Whenever he plays he does well.
You say lets see Vermaelen play consistently for 10 years, well lets see King play atleast 5 consecutive matches? Vermaelen did very well for his first season, his positional errors get highlighted too much and overshadow what he does well.
I'd much rather have Vermaelen than King, but that's just my opinion. You would obviously go for King being a Spurs fan. If King was less injury prone then I would pick him.
King did play 5 game consecutively at the end of last season oO)
How can you say his positional errors get highlited too much? He plays for Arsenal, and is costing them big goals in big games resulting in them eventually slumping out of competitions. Positioning is hugely important at this level.
Reallyyyyyy???
Ferdinand?!
Valencia?!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
King is a much better centre half all round really, reads the game much better, is far more experienced, and is still fairly good technically for a centre back. But i feel that centre backs should defend first, attack second.
Whenever King plays he always plays good, i've hardly ever seen him play a bad game, he could be injured for 6 months and then come back and play brilliantly. Whenever he plays he does well.
King did play 5 game consecutively at the end of last season oO)
How can you say his positional errors get highlited too much? He plays for Arsenal, and is costing them big goals in big games resulting in them eventually slumping out of competitions. Positioning is hugely important at this level.