Then what's the reason behind calling a sport played with your hands 'football'? I mean, it's rugby for poofs and you call it football, yet you call football 'soccer'. I give a rats *** about the history of the term, we can all wiki it after all. You could call football 'Sunday mass' for all I care. I'm not going to run around shooting people for calling it 'soccer', but it annoys me really.
Yes I can be a narrowminded ******* sometimes, but if there's one thing I don't like about Americans (Aside from the fact they call themselves after a whole ****** continent!) is the fact they 'changed' a sport's name for their own... convenience? That said, I'm also against driving on the right, but I'm not that vocal about it (here).
What's the point of calling a sport where you kick with your feet 'heel' when you very rarely actually kick the ball with your heel? What's the point of giving a sport a name that's just a translation? And how about calling rugby 'football?' You don't use your feet very much to kick the ball in rugby either.
Once again, Americans did NOT invent the term soccer. The British did. There was association football and rugby football and the former was sometimes called soccer (from the abbreviation 'assoc. football'). Rugby became more popular in the US, Canada, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, some Caribbean nations, etc., so in those places, association football was called by its popular British nickname 'soccer,' while rugby football became known as football. In the US, a variation of rugby eventually became so popular that it replaced rugby, so we call that football instead. If you can find one problem with this than please let us know but don't respond with the same old tired argument that we changed things to accomodate our own ways or that soccer is played with the feet and should be called football.
As far as our name, yes it is annoying that we can only be called Americans in English. Luckily in Spanish you don't have to, and I always use either 'estadounidense' or 'yanqui,' but a lot of the time people don't understand so I'm forced to say 'americano.' To be fair we were the first independent nation in the Americas, so I guess we got dibbs on the name. Mainly it happened because at that time we only thought of ourselves as being from certain states (you considered yourself a Virginian, a New Yorker, etc., not an American), so we didn't have a word for the colonies as a whole. The best we could do was come up with the name the United States of America.
Also, we're not named after one continent...there's two continents with the name America. Might not sound like a big deal but it makes a big difference. If you want to refer to people of one continent (like when we say Europeans), than you say either North Americans or South Americans. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to refer collectively to people from two continents. Even though Europe and Asia are connected by much more than a narrow isthmus (and shouldn't be considered separate continents for that matter), we don't hear people talk about Euro-Asians. Sometimes you hear about the Eurasian super continent, but the term Eurasian usually refers to someone who lives in Central Asia between Europe and Asia. So yeah, I don't think it's too big of a problem. Just say North American or South American when you refer to people of one of those continents.
Many of the fans from Pac-NW areas are there for the culture and not the game. I'm sure some actually care about soccer but the majority want to be different.
Yeah we actually don't even watch the games when we go to them. Usually we just listen to Indie music while having gay *** and burning American flags, because we really like to be different and counter-cultural.