Tottigol75
Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2014
- Messages
- 84
- Reaction score
- 15
- Points
- 8
I tried AVIATOR V4 since lisa said it's her/his best tactic.....and i must admit its the truth.Fair enough! =)
I tried AVIATOR V4 since lisa said it's her/his best tactic.....and i must admit its the truth.Fair enough! =)
I have it and using it right now, since i am about to start a new season, but i think its more correct for lisa to give you eventually the link since its her/his tactic. From a first glimpse it looks more robust on the defensive respect to red bull but keeping the same high power offense. But as i said i still have to test it in a whole season.
Yes. But i think AVIATOR is much better. I dident try it before. Just redbull, then the first 442 which now is V6. I wanted to give a go to AVIATOR since Lisa thinks it the best one and untill now i agree 110%.Is the update posted by Lisa in this thread the tactic you were using/speaking about (Stylekiller V6 / 442 formation)?
Yes. But i think AVIATOR is much better. I dident try it before. Just redbull, then the first 442 which now is V6. I wanted to give a go to AVIATOR since Lisa thinks it the best one and untill now i agree 110%.
do you mean the last STYLEKILLER?4-4-1-1 seems to be the most stable
mate coz of huge RNG there is no point to run one season test per team those scores will change slightly if u make at least 2-3 more runs per team/tactic thats the obvious thing in this year FM its all about stability not about highest pts with only one season.I 'use last update.
I was try new test. With 5 underdog team.
UNDERDOG TESTS Max is maximum potential of tactic TOP 3 is trying to eliminate RNG (FMRTE is not being used) View attachment 499047
Just to clear mate this with aviator ?This the progresso untill now with Aviator. Fantastic, i love the way you break oppo offensive and counter immediately.
V4 !Just to clear mate this with aviator ?
can you link. Me to that versionyou use
cheers
V4 !
You should try Terv2 . I come 2nd with fc.KolnGreat result with WerderView attachment 502903View attachment 502904