why does counter have play out of defence? anyone got any presets?
Ah right ok i'll give these a go. Thanks.my mistake...it's been corrected
okey im going to test this in llm.. but wonder what approch to use?? want to play 4-2-3-1 wide.. thanks in advice
Yes but I do not really understand how to do ??? if I want to play a 4-2-3-1 .. with structured style of play and counter-attack and then wants to to make a second approach with control approach, do i need to use this then http://i.imgur.com/5LrRKyV.jpg?
and this one for counter? http://i.imgur.com/GNCdXF6.jpg
and can i use same roles and dutys for control and the counter tactic??
going to try LLM with 4-1-2-2-1 tactic and go for attacking =) will report back
how to i set up a 4-4-2 counter since it's a flat formation. Per your instructions i have to play very fluid. do i have to use two RPMs in central midfield what about wide midfielders do they both have to be WPM.Thanks
what approach do u think works best for an away tactic?? counter maby or defend? thanks
This is really a interesting tread...... I was looking for something like this, to discuss about it...... And your guidelines are really helpful who like me wants an understanding of the entirely game...... I really struggle, to understand what the opposition is doing, I mean, if it s attacking or defending etc etc..... Can you help me to have an general understanding? I'll appreciate so much and may have a full enjoy of the game
Thanks for sharing, I've had a difficult time adapting to the new tactics and match engine, as I've only just recently been able to stop playing FM 2012, but this is a good foundation and you've helped me get a better understanding of how I put my own ideas into the game.
Currently I'm playing a wide 4-2-3-1 on Control with a fluid shape and TI's to match, and I was wondering whether it makes a difference if I change the wingers(attack) to inside forwards(attack)? Like you suggested I've got an AM(attack) and a DLF(S), will there be enough space for the inside forwards to do their thing or would a 4-1-2-2-1 formation be more beneficial? On a good run, with an important game coming up, so don't want to experiment too much ATM. Thanks in advance=)