If anyone is wondering why I recommend these roles only, there is a simple explanation. If you use two strikers, one on support, and one on attack, the supporting one will feed the attacking one, meaning your best bet is to play deeper, less agressive, so attacking one has space to run into. Or you will struggle. Even in that setup, the supporting one isn't scoring, which is a waste of striker position. If you had two attack duty strikers, and played less agressively, you would be more of a threat, defenders would have to opt to guard just one. If you had two supporting duty strikers, and played more agressively, they would both again be a threat. Same thing is with inside forwards and fullbacks. If you have one IFa and want him to score, you need to stretch the pitch on his side with a FBA or WBa, meaning he would do better as a raumdeuter in a very fluid setup. If you want to do that in a fluid setup, and perhaps have one FBa and one FBs, only one of them would play correctly, the supporting one, while the FBa would struggle. You could use two FBs and a Wa plus Ifa, but you would in that case fail to stretch the opponent on one side, making your central players job more difficult. Although it would probably help in ******** up their defence. The IFa will also not help in defending, so if you are bent on using one, make sure it's against a weaker team.
